Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 6 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Still..1/2 time only...
But fa.......rk
Still..
Was thinking of taking the Saints +36.5 which is what I thought the line would be. 16.5 was absurdly generous. There was no way Saints would get that close.
How they give 16.5 points after the Dogs beat Syd and St K are bottom 3 I'll never know. Their loss, my gain
Hands up if you jumped the gun and jinxed yourselfStill..
Was thinking of taking the Saints +36.5 which is what I thought the line would be. 16.5 was absurdly generous. There was no way Saints would get that close.
How they give 16.5 points after the Dogs beat Syd and St K are bottom 3 I'll never know. Their loss, my gain
i've never even considered starting Lonie...maybe i should. i'll be going with Hogan ahead of him based on a gut feel that the Saints will lose by 75+
Salem or Krak (or Lonie)
if Krak is a guaranteed starter then thats the way im leaning.
VDB.
Assuming neither are a sub: Krakour or Young?
Advice please, to win a cashie league game I have to decide between these 2 options
Option 1. Take Tarrant's 78 E score = NicNat needs to score 118 for me to win
Option 2. Don't take Tarrant's E score = NicNat & Krak need to score a combined 195 for me to win
Advice please, to win a cashie league game I have to decide between these 2 options
Option 1. Take Tarrant's 78 E score = NicNat needs to score 118 for me to win
Option 2. Don't take Tarrant's E score = NicNat & Krak need to score a combined 195 for me to win
Somewhat agree. Can't see you winning regardless TBCH. Even if NN does score 118, Krak will need 77 under option two. Chances of Krak hitting a ton and reducing NN's workload to respectable 95 are slim.Option 2
Nicnat cant score 118 imho