No Oppo Supporters 2016 General AFL Discussion Part 2 (Sydney Posters Only)

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.

Log in to remove this ad.

Interesting re Watson and Brownlow.....Why strip that, yet say AA is valid? Imagine Ben Johnson being considered Athlete of the year....is Lance Armstrong still holding any Cyclist of the year awards. I know circumstances may be different, but performance enhancing drugs are called that for a reason, regardless of how they get into your system they are there.Whilst I dont give a stuff either way re AA, just another example of AFL rules being applied selectively...(good bloke rule maybe?)....I am really peeved at how this administration has basically taken away a sport I really loved, everything about AFL these days needs to be viewed with a very healthy dollop of skepticism and cynicism.
 
kickthething said:
Interesting re Watson and Brownlow.....Why strip that, yet say AA is valid? Imagine Ben Johnson being considered Athlete of the year....is Lance Armstrong still holding any Cyclist of the year awards. I know circumstances may be different, but performance enhancing drugs are called that for a reason, regardless of how they get into your system they are there.Whilst I dont give a stuff either way re AA, just another example of AFL rules being applied selectively...(good bloke rule maybe?)....I am really peeved at how this administration has basically taken away a sport I really loved, everything about AFL these days needs to be viewed with a very healthy dollop of skepticism and cynicism.
Click to expand...

They might not have a clear memory or idea of who the 23rd best player was that year.

And they can't watch the replay AA presentation night because the panel has about eight 23rd best players every year.
 
Yep good points both.I dont think you would need to replace him in the side though..as I wrote Re:AA..its not a big issue however I feel it underscores the big issue.!!!
 
Minor annoyance:

Why does the Lachie Whitfield saga need to be called a 'saga'?

The Essendon saga is rightfully a saga because it went on for like 4 years. This Whitfield controversy was only for a few months at most.

Seems like word associaton. Saga = drug scandal now.
 
scaryness said:
Minor annoyance:

Why does the Lachie Whitfield saga need to be called a 'saga'?

The Essendon saga is rightfully a saga because it went on for like 4 years. This Whitfield controversy was only for a few months at most.

Seems like word associaton. Saga = drug scandal now.
Click to expand...
Kip Casper (Klon radio): "I need a saga, what's the saga?"
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

P Kelly Legend said:
Not swans related but interesting read on the draft side show.......the usual afl - start with in the end in mind, figure out how to get there on the run.

https://www.sen.com.au/news/2016/11/25/culbert-there-s-something-smelly-about-the-gws-charges/
Click to expand...
It is sort of swans related . The AFL knew about this 12 months ago. How long does it take to question the honest young woman, view some text messages and listen to three liars? Whitfield should not have been playing in the finals.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Similar threads

Ticky009
No Oppo Supporters 2025 AFL General Discussion
2
Replies
35
Views
2K
Dubai Quacker
Dubai Quacker
Ticky009
No Oppo Supporters 2025 General Discussion
Replies
8
Views
318
Ruck n Roll from RWO
R
Ticky009
  • Locked
No Oppo Supporters 2024 AFL General Discussion
197 198 199 200 201
Replies
5K
Views
155K
SwansProudly
SwansProudly
S
Analysis Swans General Performance 2024
13 14 15 16 17
Replies
401
Views
21K
Heeney2Franklin
Heeney2Franklin
SwansProudly
Brownlow 2024 Brownlow Medal Discussion
17 18 19 20 21
Replies
503
Views
8K
LukeParkerno1
LukeParkerno1
Ticky009
  • Locked
No Oppo Supporters 2024 General AFLW Discussion
2 3 4
Replies
76
Views
3K
Callipygian
Callipygian
SwansProudly
POTY Round 23 Essendon v. Sydney
2
Replies
29
Views
1K
bedford
B

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top