2016 trade hypotheticals

Remove this Banner Ad

Do you honestly think pick 2 would be a better player than Mitchell let alone throwing Jones in as well.
Yes I think pick 2 has a high chance of being better then Mitchell. However I rate both Mitchell and Jones highly. Both would be worth first rounders. So effectively it's like the trades where people are offering off pick 2 for 2 lower first rounders just its players worth first rounders.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Do you honestly think pick 2 would be a better player than Mitchell let alone throwing Jones in as well.

That's like saying pick 2 probably wouldn't be a better player than Rockliff. Yet do you think people would agree he is worth it? It's the same thing.

Since 2000.

2000: Justin Koschitzke
2001: Luke Ball
2002: Daniel Wells
2003: Andrew Walker
2004: Jarryd Roughead
2005: Dale Thomas
2006: Scott Gumbleton
2007: Trent Cotchin
2008: Nic Nat
2009: Jack Trengove
2010: Harley Bennell
2011: Stephen Coniglio
2012: Johnathon O'Rourke
2013: Joshua Kelly
2014: Christian Petracca
2015: Joshua Schache

Probably 5 or 6 in that group I'd take ahead of someone like Rockliff or Mitchell.
 
That's like saying pick 2 probably wouldn't be a better player than Rockliff. Yet do you think people would agree he is worth it? It's the same thing.

Since 2000.

2000: Justin Koschitzke
2001: Luke Ball
2002: Daniel Wells
2003: Andrew Walker
2004: Jarryd Roughead
2005: Dale Thomas
2006: Scott Gumbleton
2007: Trent Cotchin
2008: Nic Nat
2009: Jack Trengove
2010: Harley Bennell
2011: Stephen Coniglio
2012: Johnathon O'Rourke
2013: Joshua Kelly
2014: Christian Petracca
2015: Joshua Schache

Probably 5 or 6 in that group I'd take ahead of someone like Rockliff or Mitchell.

I would rather the guarantee of Mitchell and Jones over the risk of getting an O'Rourke or Trengove.
 
That's like saying pick 2 probably wouldn't be a better player than Rockliff. Yet do you think people would agree he is worth it? It's the same thing.

Since 2000.

2000: Justin Koschitzke
2001: Luke Ball
2002: Daniel Wells
2003: Andrew Walker
2004: Jarryd Roughead
2005: Dale Thomas
2006: Scott Gumbleton
2007: Trent Cotchin
2008: Nic Nat
2009: Jack Trengove
2010: Harley Bennell
2011: Stephen Coniglio
2012: Johnathon O'Rourke
2013: Joshua Kelly
2014: Christian Petracca
2015: Joshua Schache

Probably 5 or 6 in that group I'd take ahead of someone like Rockliff or Mitchell.

I would rather the guarantee of Mitchell and Jones over the risk of getting an O'Rourke or Trengove.

Essentially, I'm in agreeance with you. Merely suggesting most people and even clubs comically overrate draft picks.

At pick 2 though they also had the chance to take any player who went at pick 3, pick 4, pick 5 etc. I don't really get the argument of "these are the players taken at this pick historically, this is what it's worth".
 
Im hearing that Norths second rounder (around 30) + Aaron Black will be moved to Carlton for Zach Touhy.

North will be getting an end of first round compensation pick for Daniel wells so will still head into the draft with 11 and 20ish.
 
Im hearing that Norths second rounder (around 30) + Aaron Black will be moved to Carlton for Zach Touhy.

North will be getting an end of first round compensation pick for Daniel wells so will still head into the draft with 11 and 20ish.

At his age it could be band 3. No real precedent on a contract that big at his age.
 
At his age it could be band 3. No real precedent on a contract that big at his age.

The age is a factor but he will become a top 3 highest paid player at Collingwood next year, which will favour an end of first round pick to North.

Im struggling to think of anyone besides Pendles who would be on over 500k next year at collingwood next year, especially with treloars back ended deal.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

At pick 2 though they also had the chance to take any player who went at pick 3, pick 4, pick 5 etc. I don't really get the argument of "these are the players taken at this pick historically, this is what it's worth".
It's ridiculous logic, it would be like if pick 7 happened to have the best list of players someone trying to argue it was worth more than say pick 2 which might not have had the same success rate. I can't comprehend how people don't understand that who was drafted at what pick is irrelevant.

Higher pick = higher value regardless of any player selection history.
 
Im hearing that Norths second rounder (around 30) + Aaron Black will be moved to Carlton for Zach Touhy.

North will be getting an end of first round compensation pick for Daniel wells so will still head into the draft with 11 and 20ish.
There is literally 0% chance this happens
 
So you think Norths pick 11 is more around the mark?

Dreaming
If it was going to happen i think it would be closer to Tuohy & 23 for 11 & 2017 3rd or something. Not saying you would do it but with the little currency we have, its going to take a decent pick to get us to trade him. We've drafted McKay, SOSOS & Curnow. No point picking up a spud like Black.
 
The age is a factor but he will become a top 3 highest paid player at Collingwood next year, which will favour an end of first round pick to North.

Im struggling to think of anyone besides Pendles who would be on over 500k next year at collingwood next year, especially with treloars back ended deal.

Yeah he well could be band 2. I'm just saying the afl has complete discretion on this one, given age is a factor and there is no precedent. They could cite Waite getting nothing as justification for giving you band 3.
 
Im hearing that Norths second rounder (around 30) + Aaron Black will be moved to Carlton for Zach Touhy.

North will be getting an end of first round compensation pick for Daniel wells so will still head into the draft with 11 and 20ish.
Do you really think if you had pick 11 & 19, we would accept Black & 30?!
 
Im hearing that Norths second rounder (around 30) + Aaron Black will be moved to Carlton for Zach Touhy.

North will be getting an end of first round compensation pick for Daniel wells so will still head into the draft with 11 and 20ish.

Just had a look at your posting history...you don't even have the strike rate of a broken watch.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

2016 trade hypotheticals

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top