Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Assuming Gaff is worth a first rounder, then you could consider a swap of the two a reasonable trade (either Gaff for Brayshaw or the pick generated from the Gaff deal to Melbourne). Duggan wouldnt get it done alone, you'd need to offer up our second I reckon.Brayshaw has looked at times to have the class as an inside mid yet he is unable to break into Melbourne's top team. Why? Is it the concussion or is it something else? I would be reluctant to go hard on someone with repeating physical flaws and his all too frequent concussion is worrying. Just think about Hawthorn with O'Meara with his knee problems right now!
He went pick 3 and Melbourne are going to want something significant for him so our first round plus is probably what they want (I would expect they want 1st plus second or third or player). You may argue that he is worth less but I sense there is still emotional investment in him and they have not given up yet. He was going to be pivotal to their rebuild.
This year, We have a chance to get a gun genuine KPF with our 1st round and the gun key forwards are usually taken early. I would only consider Brayshaw if if we were to trade out next year's draft picks or trade a player that wanted to go to Melbourne.
Question: If Duggan or Gaff wanted to go home, what would be needed by either side to bring Brayshaw across? I would want something else from them if they took Gaff but Duggan seems a little light and perhaps a swap of later picks.
Assuming Gaff is worth a first rounder, then you could consider a swap of the two a reasonable trade (either Gaff for Brayshaw or the pick generated from the Gaff deal to Melbourne). Duggan wouldnt get it done alone, you'd need to offer up our second I reckon.
Who do you consider to be the players we could afford to shop around this year?
Possibly, but I reckon they'll put more value on an inside player with a more rounded game compared to an outside player with nil contested game. However Gaff is proven whereas Brayshaw doesnt have the runs on the board.Gaff is worth so much more than Brayshaw, they would be adding in extra in that scenario.
Given neither have really established themselves Brayshaw for Duggan are closer to a straight swap.
Gaff for Brayshaw is overs. Like kane249 says, we would want way more. Besides, Melbourne are overflowing with inside mids and Gaff would actually be a great get for them. If we were to trade Gaff and our second for Brayshaw and their first, I would be willing to work it further.Assuming Gaff is worth a first rounder, then you could consider a swap of the two a reasonable trade (either Gaff for Brayshaw or the pick generated from the Gaff deal to Melbourne). Duggan wouldnt get it done alone, you'd need to offer up our second I reckon.
Who do you consider to be the players we could afford to shop around this year?
The concussion question mark is huge. It could be a career killer which even though its harsh, is a lever for us. You could possibly trade our third with Gaff and make it work if the concussion thing is that serious.Gaff for Brayshaw is overs. Like kane249 says, we would want way more. Besides, Melbourne are overflowing with inside mids and Gaff would actually be a great get for them. If we were to trade Gaff and our second for Brayshaw and their first, I would be willing to work it further.
If Baryshaw was interested in a move, Melbourne have a real dilemma. A top draft pick in Nov 2014, he has had 2 and a bit years to establish himself and despite a brilliant 2015, he has not lived up to the expectations and now has the concussion question mark on him.
Duggan was only taken 8 spots ahead of Brayshaw and in hindsight it might be said that Melbourne reached with Brayshaw. Besides, I am not wanting to trade Duggan for Brayshaw.
You must have a very low view of Gaff's value. I would want Brayshaw and their third before I even considered parting with Gaff.The concussion question mark is huge. It could be a career killer which even though its harsh, is a lever for us. You could possibly trade our third with Gaff and make it work if the concussion thing is that serious.
I thought Brayshaw was always mooted in the top 5 of that draft. I didn't think Melbourne reached with him at all. Agree, no way Duggan is mentioned in the discussions unless the offer is too good to resist.
I meant:You must have a very low view of Gaff's value. I would want Brayshaw and their third before I even considered parting with Gaff.
What role would he play for us? Third tall?Rumour mill has Freo targetting Mitch McGovern at season's end. Surely we'd be in on that.
Duggan less tradeable than gaff?WowPossibly, but I reckon they'll put more value on an inside player with a more rounded game compared to an outside player with nil contested game. However Gaff is proven whereas Brayshaw doesnt have the runs on the board.
Gaff for Brayshaw plus Melbourne's 2nd? Would be a good deal for us.
I would be hesitant to trade Duggan. Prior to his corkie we were beginning to see him come into some form.
Cost this and next year's 1st's.I wouldn't be against trying to get Josh Shache from Brisbane as a Kennedy replacement ..
Assuming Gaff is worth a first rounder, then you could consider a swap of the two a reasonable trade (either Gaff for Brayshaw or the pick generated from the Gaff deal to Melbourne). Duggan wouldnt get it done alone, you'd need to offer up our second I reckon.
Who do you consider to be the players we could afford to shop around this year?
If he was gettable at that price it might be worthwhile. If we are looking for a replacement KPF then he would fit the bill. If we were to pick a KPF with next year's first then there is no guarantee that he would be any good, or as good as Schache, so that's the first pick gone. Schache is top end talent like Kennedy which our later first round picks are not going to allow us access to. But why would he want to come to WA? Isn't he a Victorian? We aren't that big a destination club yet are we? So this is all hypothetical.Cost this and next year's 1st's.
Gaff is a 25 year old AA mid who recently won the best and fairest. There is no chance Brayshaw would be enough on his own. But I think the chances of Gaff going are so remote there's probably not much point exploring that trade possibility.
McGovern is an interesting one. We could certainly do with another dangerous forward as our stocks are either ageing (Hill, LeCras) or faltering (Darling and to a lesser extent Cripps). That being said, I'd rather we focus on a quality young mid or otherwise retain it in the hope of drafting a KPF.
I'd love to get McGovern but it sounds like we will need to pay him a truckload (600k+ per year) and would have to pay up in a trade to Adelaide. We generally bring lube to trade week so heaven knows what we'd give up to get him. I'd rather use the cap space go hard at a free agent that we dont have to pay for.