- Aug 28, 2017
- 771
- 979
- AFL Club
- Essendon
I hope he washed his hands afterwards .Hey Cobba Not the issue - Shook hands with your Pres last year - that's a clue just for you
THE MISUNDERSTOOD EYE
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
I hope he washed his hands afterwards .Hey Cobba Not the issue - Shook hands with your Pres last year - that's a clue just for you
THE MISUNDERSTOOD EYE
Unfortunately the prez contracted pink EYE after contactI hope he washed his hands afterwards .
Kudos to La Trobe today for battling all day in both games
Are those quarter by quarter scores for the 2's correct - Glen Eira kicked 7.3 in all 4 quarters?Kudos to La Trobe today for battling all day in both games
You are correct, my friend.Are those quarter by quarter scores for the 2's correct - Glen Eira kicked 7.3 in all 4 quarters?
Just went by the scores on the VAFA siteReseves score is not correct.
The real final score is Glen Eira 33-15-213 to Latrobe 2-1-13.
Cracking good win by Manningham today. No idea if Hawthorn had injuries, or rested players, but the Cobras were very good.
Swinburne only team outside the 4 still in contention (you'd think).
Tribunal and Investigations
INDEX TO FACT SHEET
2. The Tribunal & Investigations Co-ordinator will decide whether the player can accept the minimum prescribed penalty or is required to attend a Tribunal hearing.
(a) The decision will be based on the player’s prior history and the nature of the report.
(b) If a player has a prior history (ie. a suspension) during the current season and/or during the season before the current season, they will not be granted the prescribed penalty.
I'm questioning whether two players (one in Prem C, one in D3) who were rubbed out last season were allowed to take the Prescribed Penalty this week gone!
Are the 'goodpeople' at the VAFA going to fine themselves?
How do you know these guys were reported, where is it reported? And who is Brian? Can they challenge?, I thought they took prescribed sat after the game!Would not be allowed to happen - Brian Speaking
Tribunal says Munro from D3 - Anyone know if he was "rubbed out last year?"
The UNKNOWING EYE?
See C Grade post?
My guess and with clues given...he is likely to be involved in the umpiring fraternity ?.How do you know these guys were reported, where is it reported? And who is Brian? Can they challenge?, I thought they took prescribed sat after the game!
How do you know these guys were reported, where is it reported? And who is Brian? Can they challenge?, I thought they took prescribed sat after the game!
Player from Canterbury told me late last week that Munro from Richmond Centrals got 3 weeks in last game of 2017 against Canterbury. Shouldnt his prescribed be canned and more weeks given?
Umpire can decide if case will go to tribunal. Must advise club on Saturday.How do you know these guys were reported, where is it reported? And who is Brian? Can they challenge?, I thought they took prescribed sat after the game!
This is correct but headquarters should be able to ensure that players with a poor history should attend regardless.Umpire can decide if case will go to tribunal. Must advise club on Saturday.
Yes, but the umpire is not going to know if they have a previous. That's headquarters job. And that won't happen Saturday. The club should be contacted Monday and advised the prescribed is not valid & attendance is required.Umpire can decide if case will go to tribunal. Must advise club on Saturday.
Amazing what's happening on hereWhat an extraordinary contribution.
Must be finals fever approaching.