Wait until they update all their player profiles with the combine measurements. End of the week I’ve heard.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Wait until they update all their player profiles with the combine measurements. End of the week I’ve heard.
Noble on SEN talked about how trading draft picks allows clubs to really target needs now with their early picks.Will be interesting in general to see who we take with 16 and 21 if we dont trade up. I wouldnt even rule out trying to get up a few spots with 1 pick and trading 21 into next year. We dont need a lot of picks this year, and we seem to like the top 12ish talents. Reckon we would be happy to get around 12 or 13 and simply take the slider.
Next years draft not great, but wouldnt be the worst thing to have an extra pick for trading at worst.
Id be happy if we were to grab a Jackson and Gould for example, both potential sliders but unlikely. Think we are at that point in our drafting (especially when we wont have top 10 draft picks playing finals) where we simply take the slider/best available talent. Not really target needs.
Noble has talked about trying to trade 34.In Twomey’s last Phantom Form Guide Taheny wasn’t in the top 30 so there is a chance he is there at 34.
That’s of course if we are even going to use 34 in the draft?
I have a feeling that we may only take 2 live picks to the draft plus 2 Academy and 2 rookie upgrades.Noble has talked about trying to trade 34.
West Coast are probably a good option.Noble has talked about trying to trade 34.
If we plan on drafting two academy kids, we will need to take 4 live picks to the draft.I have a feeling that we may only take 2 live picks to the draft plus 2 Academy and 2 rookie upgrades.
Good deal for West Coast.West Coast are probably a good option.
Their first pick this year is 46.
So maybe 34 for their future second.
will get us back into the second round next year too.
I feel quite sure you know what I mean.If we plan on drafting two academy kids, we will need to take 4 live picks to the draft.
Won’t work anyway because they have already traded their future first.Good deal for West Coast.
Won’t work anyway because they have already traded their future first.
So unless they get another one in somehow.
Guilty.Always amusing how this board tends to talk itself into favoured potential draftees. And then proceeds to get a bit sulky when we don’t draft said player.
Always amusing how this board tends to talk itself into favoured potential draftees. And then proceeds to get a bit sulky when we don’t draft said player.
Rantall isn’t viewed as a top 30 pick by most of the professional draft watchers (i.e those who get paid to write about the draft). He’s just one of my personal favourites as I’m not keen on a lot of the draft prospects generally spoken about in the 15 to 25 range.Just reading over the last few pages theres maybe a dozen young fellas mentioned that people think may be available at our first 2 picks. Good agruments have been made for each. Drawbacks have been observed for some. Jackson, gould, bergman, sharp, bianco, rantnall, stephens, day, im sure theres others ive missed, every one of them could suit our club for one reason or another. Surely 2 of that dozen will be around at our two first picks, any 2 would do me if the club saw fit. I think our draft team will be quite happy with the variety of talent about to choose from.
I’d whip out another “crazy balls” like comment.This place will be a riot when we take Sharp at the end of the first round despite it being a good value pick at a position of need and he is a two time AA.
Why do you think that? You seem very certain that the club wouldn’t be interested. Inside info or just having a stab in the dark?
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
Jeremy Sharp is so outside he runs around the boundary with umpire. If they can’t find their own ball then it’s highly likely they don’t succeed so if he can’t do it at a junior level he most probably won’t do it at AFL level.
I haven’t read/heard a discussion on Gould’s skin folds.The fat boys always slide. His skinfolds and weight were way higher than anyone was expecting.
Personally I love him and hope we take him just think it is very unlikely unless he slides to our third pick (possible but unlikely to go down that far).
There is also prevailing thinking (which I think is wrong but exists anyway) that the man-childs do not have as much potential improvement over the less developed kids.
Plus our recruiting staff have been talking about midfielders and running (fast) defenders.
I know he is a much better runner than his 106 kg would suggest but he does not fit such an immediate need.
So even if he is available for our first two picks (and I think he will be) I think it is highly unlikely we will pick him.
No inside info - I have just been a keen draft watcher for many years and I think this is how it will pan out.
I could be wrong but lets wait and see.
Draft Central will be updated on Thursday with all player profiles, and next Monday the last power rankings will come out.Gould is listed at 98 KG on draft central. Where does it say he is 106?
How many 18 year olds do you know that are living on there own going to uni , working part time and playing in a Grand final in senior SANFL side . Give the kid a break
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app