Me too (minus the swearing), that is, unless the pick swap in and of itself somehow benefits both parties. Definitely no to a meek trade for Martin after the fact.I would now only do a pick swap it benefits us, fu** cockroach
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Me too (minus the swearing), that is, unless the pick swap in and of itself somehow benefits both parties. Definitely no to a meek trade for Martin after the fact.I would now only do a pick swap it benefits us, fu** cockroach
Any discussions about a possible pick swap should begin with "Seeing as you f’ed us over in the trade period, as a show of good faith delist Martin immediately. And then we can begin discussions."
Fisher probably, Dow I don't think so.Both are very clearly in our current best 22.
I’m a bit confused about the specific workings of the DFA as well mate.Excuse my naivety, but if no contract offer is tabled to Martin by 31 Oct (first list lodgement deadline), then he automatically becomes a DFA from 1st November?
So technically, he could be in the navy blue by the end of next week.
I'd be hoping this was the case....and any discussions around our pick 9 would be along the lines that we would guarantee a swap of draft picks with GCS on draft night if the players that we have targeted have already been selected - along the lines that we'll trade pick 9 for your pick 15 and a swap future 2nd/3rd round picks....or something like that.
I don't think that can be right. If he is offered a contract he cannot just delist himself. That would mean every out of contract would or could do this, such as Jack Martin. St Kilda has to delist him.Newnes has so far chosen not to sign the current contract on offer, so he could simply choose to be a delisted free agent. As I understand, the recent contract offer to Newnes was significantly lower than his previous contract. Unsurprisingly, he probably feels quite annoyed and is assessing his current options as a DFA.
Correct on your last assumption as far as I know that is the case. Unless Newnes signs the contract in front of him by Oct 31 he automatically becomes a delisted free agent. Martin on the other hand is not a free agent of any kind and therefore has to go through either of the drafts if he is not signed up.I’m a bit confused about the specific workings of the DFA as well mate.
Someone has suggested Newnes had a contract offer from Saints for two years but rejected it as it was a low ball and he is now going to delist himself so we can potentially pick him up as DFA.
So you would assume that Martin would be the same but all the talk is him risking going into PSD.
Is Newnes actually a RFA and that’s why this is the case but not for Martin as he will not be RFA til next year?
Always respect supporters who keep the faith despite not being able to get to games - kudos......Fisher probably, Dow I don't think so.
Until he gets his kicking sorted out he is a liability.
I’m a bit confused about the specific workings of the DFA as well mate.
Someone has suggested Newnes had a contract offer from Saints for two years but rejected it as it was a low ball and he is now going to delist himself so we can potentially pick him up as DFA.
So you would assume that Martin would be the same but all the talk is him risking going into PSD.
Is Newnes actually a RFA and that’s why this is the case but not for Martin as he will not be RFA til next year?
Once I get a car which can drive from Perth to Melbourne in a decent time, I'll be there every week.Always respect supporters who keep the faith despite not being able to get to games - kudos......
This will put pressure on the younger types to perform and perform consistently. Newnes will have their spot if they don't.Getting Jack Newnes is a nice addition, great work Blues.
Delisted Saint to play on at Carlton after rejecting two-year deal
Jack Newnes will continue his career at Carlton after informing the Saints of his desire to move as a delisted free agentwww.afl.com.au
Not 100% sure but I think he had to be delisted by St Kilda because he had a contract in front of him.Correct on your last assumption as far as I know that is the case. Unless Newnes signs the contract in front of him by Oct 31 he automatically becomes a delisted free agent. Martin on the other hand is not a free agent of any kind and therefore has to go through either of the drafts if he is not signed up.
As things stand now after the Newnes news and assuming we take Martin in the PSD, lets say we add 3 players via the ND and 2 players via the RD.
SPS Jones Plowman
Marchbank Weitering Docherty
Walsh Cripps Setterfield
Cuningham Curnow Martin
Betts McKay McGovern
Kreuzer Curnow Murphy
Silvagni Dow Stocker Fisher
-----------------------------------
Simpson Goddard(R) Silvagni
Newman Macreadie Williamson
Newnes Robertson(ND 9) OBrien
Lang Casboult Polson
Owies(R) De Koning ODwyer
Pittonet Kennedy Gibbons(R)
Cottrell(R) (ND) (ND) (RD) (RD)
Senior List 39
Cat A Rookie 5
Cat B Rookie 1
I don't think that can be right. If he is offered a contract he cannot just delist himself. That would mean every out of contract would or could do this, such as Jack Martin. St Kilda has to delist him.
Edit; I think Newnes was a free agent before the trade period.
It is all a bit confusing.
Fair crack.
Reckon Simmo starts in the seniors, no point him going around again if that wasn't the case. He might not be there by the end of the year, but that'll come down to form.
Expecting Newnes to impress during the preseason and start in the seniors too. Good opportunity to give one of the kids a reality check and see how they respond.
Gibbons same deal, plenty of scope for improvement in his game with another preseason.
Newman too, was one of our better players last season. Maybe Docherty coming back forces him out, maybe it's one of him and Simmo but not both. But I have a feeling he's in the side at the start of the year.
So my changes would be:
IN - Simpson, Newnes, Gibbons, Newman(?)
OUT: Fisher, Stocker, Dow, Cuningham(?)
Looking at it now though...it's 4 attacking players out for 2 defensive players and 2 transition players. So maybe Teague will see it differently.
Just think we'll start with a more mature/experienced side under Teague, with the expectation that we win games early in the year and carry that momentum forward, bringing "kids" in a little more sparingly.
Yes, no doubt Simpson will be in the team as you never have a full list to choose from.
With that in mind, I just decided to "put him on the shelf" so to speak and kinda have a peek at what the side might look like without him going forward.
Im backing in Fisher Stocker Dow and Cuningham and hope the club do too ...
Pickett doesn’t real count, as Deluca came onto the list, giving us 44 (+ Owies) for the second half of the year.OUTS__________ INS -
Thomas__________ Newnes
Pickett___________ Betts
Phillips___________ Pittonet
Schumacher_______ Martin
Garlett___________ #9
LeBois____________ Manton?
Deluca____________ TBC
Fasolo____________ TBC
Lobbe____________ TBC
Kerr______________ TBC
If Martin comes on and especially so for nothing, we would be in front from this trade/draft period.
Nailing the #9 could make all the difference though.
Would love someone like a Jordan Clark, Xavier Duursma or a Zac Butters @ that #9.
To have a player that come come in and make impact from the get-go, would put a different light on what came about from our trading and drafting.
Pickett doesn’t real count, as Deluca came onto the list, giving us 44 (+ Owies) for the second half of the year.