We didn't.I've come up the southern end high for the last quarter. If we playwith some directness and passion i want to be thete.
On SM-G920I using BigFooty.com mobile app
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
We didn't.I've come up the southern end high for the last quarter. If we playwith some directness and passion i want to be thete.
On SM-G920I using BigFooty.com mobile app
He needs to more about him than just a good kick. Doesn't seem to be read the play well.I hope Farrell gets more senior games next year.
I can’t see a reserves comp happening for some time but I do see you guys playing in the VFL within a couple of years. Had a very good chat to a SANFL club President a couple of weeks ago and he mentioned that Williamstown and Port Melbourne have enquired about joining the SANFL and that the SANFL club delegates are pushing for a cap of 12 AFL players each week in the SANFL and they have a meeting coming up in a few months where this will be pushed further. Can’t see you or the Crows wanting to stay if that gets up. The AFL is also leaning on the SANFL to have the same rules across all comps that their sides are in to ease transition between the two comps. If Williamstown and Pt Melbourne head over here the VFL would virtually be a Victorian AFL reserves comp and even talk of the Swans and GWS joining as the NEAFL is uncompetitive.Two things:
First: Average Grand Final attendances at Adelaide Oval
– 32,064 (Excluding Port Adelaide).
– 39,187 (Including Port Adelaide).
= +22%
Second: Under no circumstances should we remain in the SANFL IF the side we field is NOT our AFL reserves side. Absolute waste of time and resources to field three mens teams. I don't believe this is a genuine contemplation within our administration. I think it is in the best interests of SA football for there to be no national reserves (despite the NO AFL in the SANFL crowd) as it will deteriorate the standard of local football here. However if a national reserves does occur we absolutely must be in it and we cannot be running three mens teams.
I liked how instead of instead of fixing our forward entries that fell from the stratosphere we moved a tall forward to defence. Port Adelaide fpptball.
Absolutely reckon you blokes copped the rough end of the pineapple but unless things have changed the last kick OOB counts on the free kick stat sheet and there was a patch in the second quarter where I recall you guys giving away 4-5 frees for this in about 5 minutes. The ball was carrying the forwards heads with the breeze and rolling out. The Glenelg “diving” and acting was way over the top though IMOLol 31 frees
This has been happening for years at Port. Is it ou4 players who are just dumb, or our coaches?For me it was all those times we bombed it into the middle and half-forward and literally every Magpie to have ever existed leapt for it like a cocaine-addled mark’s up.
Could not one of them have stayed down to crumb?
The random Glenelgs who effortlessly rebounded must’ve thought their coach had rubbed a genie lamp.
12 players each week? Oh just brilliant SANFL. What a joke.I can’t see a reserves comp happening for some time but I do see you guys playing in the VFL within a couple of years. Had a very good chat to a SANFL club President a couple of weeks ago and he mentioned that Williamstown and Port Melbourne have enquired about joining the SANFL and that the SANFL club delegates are pushing for a cap of 12 AFL players each week in the SANFL and they have a meeting coming up in a few months where this will be pushed further. Can’t see you or the Crows wanting to stay if that gets up. The AFL is also leaning on the SANFL to have the same rules across all comps that their sides are in to ease transition between the two comps. If Williamstown and Pt Melbourne head over here the VFL would virtually be a Victorian AFL reserves comp and even talk of the Swans and GWS joining as the NEAFL is uncompetitive.
I’m assuming these figures are since redevelopment which wouldn’t really count for much as Port have been in three GF’s in that time, all against high drawing traditional clubs, Norwood, Sturt and Glenelg.Two things:
First: Average Grand Final attendances at Adelaide Oval
– 32,064 (Excluding Port Adelaide).
– 39,187 (Including Port Adelaide).
= +22%
Second: Under no circumstances should we remain in the SANFL IF the side we field is NOT our AFL reserves side. Absolute waste of time and resources to field three mens teams. I don't believe this is a genuine contemplation within our administration. I think it is in the best interests of SA football for there to be no national reserves (despite the NO AFL in the SANFL crowd) as it will deteriorate the standard of local football here. However if a national reserves does occur we absolutely must be in it and we cannot be running three mens teams.
I’m assuming these figures are since redevelopment which wouldn’t really count for much as Port have been in three GF’s in that time, all against high drawing traditional clubs, Norwood, Sturt and Glenelg.
Yet last year attracted more than 40k without Port playing and there’s a pretty fair argument that if Sturt, Norwood or Glenelg played each other there’d be 40k plus again.
The other years, 2015 and 2016 have involved WWT and West Adelaide who always draw lower crowds. So if you are just doing it from 2014 it’s a stupidly small sample size that pretty well deems it nonsensical.
Garner was crap like most of our players. He won't make afl on that performance.Garner was easily your clubs best out of all the Port AFL listed players, was a great game for us bay tragics & the crowd of 39 thou was a decent turnout.
Interesting hearing Phil Hoffman on the Sunday roast this morning talking about when we went for the second license to join the AFL and he was on our board we definitely didn't want a team in the sanfl. We were told they wouldn't sign us off to join unless we agreed to have the maggies in the local comp because they were worried about the huge impact of not having us might have spelt the death knell of them. Went onto say it's not the same magpies as it once was and we actually wanted to totally cut our ties to join the national comp. Basically we'd outgrown these Adel suburban clubs.
This is correct, Port were not going to have a team in the SANFL, but were forced to by the SANFL, so we could get the AFL licence.
Brian Cunningham spoke about it with our Rick.
Garner was crap like most of our players. He won't make afl on that performance.
That’s what they will push for but ultimately the SANFL will make the decision and I’d be very surprised if they went that way. Maybe a compromise of 14 or 15 would be my guess.12 players each week? Oh just brilliant SANFL. What a joke.
The SNAFL's General Manager Football Adam Kelly said only last week that they will not bring their rules in line with the AFL's rules despite the AFL pushing hard for it.Rules will be changed in SANFL from next year. AFL are pushing for it.
People pay for tickets when Port Adelaide is involved. I know other years the SANFL give away a lot of tickets to ensure a decent crowd.I’m assuming these figures are since redevelopment which wouldn’t really count for much as Port have been in three GF’s in that time, all against high drawing traditional clubs, Norwood, Sturt and Glenelg.
Yet last year attracted more than 40k without Port playing and there’s a pretty fair argument that if Sturt, Norwood or Glenelg played each other there’d be 40k plus again.
The other years, 2015 and 2016 have involved WWT and West Adelaide who always draw lower crowds. So if you are just doing it from 2014 it’s a stupidly small sample size that pretty well deems it nonsensical.
Vomit
I didn't.I'm surprised anyone bothered to watch this to be honest.