List Mgmt. 2019 Trade & Free Agency Thread

[Bertie22]

Based on the quality of Australian teachers, I’m not so sure.

Don't go there please, it's unbecoming. We are all on the same side after all. Unless you are a Murdoch 'journalist' or 'commentator' and I use both terms advisedly.

 

[Quintero]

Reading between the lines of Spider Burton's post, finally, it's happening;

Trade 1
Ziebell + Wood + Macmillan + Turner + Tyson > GC > 2, 15

Trade 2
Atley + 43 + Dumont + 2020 2nd > Crows > Laird + 29

Trade 3
2020 R1 > Sydney > Papley

Trade 4
25 + 29 > GWS > 13

End Picks; 2,7,13,15

N.Anderson @ 2
L.Ash@ 7
Kemp @ 13
Jackson @ 15

Don't go there please, it's unbecoming. We are all on the same side after all. Unless you are a Murdoch 'journalist' or 'commentator' and I use both terms advisedly.

Andrew Bolt is actually an enjoyable read. The rest I can probably do without.

 

[Hearts to hearts]

Maybe critiques and defences of BF posters could get their own thread, because they are derailing this one. The board has an ignore function, and you can also just let things go. There are player threads to discuss what we think of past performance. It's been pages since anything resembling a trade or FA point was made.

 

[roos_fanatic08]

This thread in a nut shell

 

[SpiderBurton22]

Reading between the lines of Spider Burton's post, finally, it's happening;

Trade 1
Ziebell + Wood + Macmillan + Turner + Tyson > GC > 2, 15

Trade 2
Atley + 43 + Dumont + 2020 2nd > Crows > Laird + 29

Trade 3
2020 R1 > Sydney > Papley

Trade 4
25 + 29 > GWS > 13

End Picks; 2,7,13,15

N.Anderson @ 2
L.Ash@ 7
Kemp @ 13
Jackson @ 15

Yeah, nah. Nothing to see on my end. I was just bullshitting.

 

[The acurate one]

Why is LMac untouchable?

He shouldn't be, but in practical terms, he probably is.

Not so sure he is untouchable, although I feel he will get an opportunity under Shaw who will give him direction

 

[The acurate one]

Maybe critiques and defences of BF posters could get their own thread, because they are derailing this one. The board has an ignore function, and you can also just let things go. There are player threads to discuss what we think of past performance. It's been pages since anything resembling a trade or FA point was made.

Snake Baker would not allow this, I'm actually stupider for reading the last few pages. Am actually not sure what is going on.

 

[DuckYeah]

Firstly, it is 'Big Footy,' not 'a Big Footy!'

Secondly, critiquing the grammar and format of articles and posts isn't a sudden trend. Rather, it is a long-standing Big Footy tradition. As is jumping from a great height on new posters who dare to critique long-standing traditions.

Finally, your last sentence is a run-on sentence in which two independent clauses are connected incorrectly. I think you meant to say:

'I actually reckon the article is well written. I just don’t necessarily agree with the conclusions drawn.'

Well done, by the way, in using 'well written' as the compound modifier at the end of that clause sentence, however, I think your point would have been better made had you used 'well-written,' thus ensuring congruity between the crap grammar and the crap content.

Its somewhat important, I mean, proper punctuation and grammar is the difference between.. Helping your Uncle, Jack, off a horse and helping your uncle jack off a horse

 

[shimaburnsgrieg]

Snake Baker would not allow this, I'm actually stupider for reading the last few pages. Am actually not sure what is going on.

This whole Board has lost direction since Snake's ban - a bit like North in the first half of 2019.

We need new leadership or Snake has to be reinstated - we just can't keep going on like this or we will get no where as a Board!

 

[BoomerRoo]

Mods:

Can someone start a "Grammar" thread please?

 

[Kangaroos4eva]

Mods:

Can someone start a "Grammar" thread please?

Don’t encourage Kimbo.

 

[Flawed Genius]

Mods:

Can someone start a "Grammar" thread please?

We shan't

As for the last few pages

Seriously vs DuckYeah

 

[dus]

If we can somehow turn Higgins into Laird and keep our first I’d do it. We’ll have Hall next year to cover Higgo.

Papley is worth a future second rounder.

Wood and this years second rounder to get another first rounder.

Rhyce needs to be taking a couple of first round picks to the draft to build his own team.

No shortcuts.

 

[Quintero]

Wow, your Mum must be so proud, or embarrassed.

I think we can all understand the difference in a spelling error versus a predictive text scenario.

Grammar and spelling affects people in different ways, as does slow midfielders, poor defensive application and lefty wowsers and right-wing nutters.

This thread has ALL of the above.

As much as I think you're a bit of crackhead, I'm still happy enough to read your nonsense until the end of the Draft and FA period.

 

[The Y Factor]

This whole Board has lost direction since Snake's ban - a bit like North in the first half of 2019.

We need new leadership or Snake has to reinstated - we just keep going on like this or we will get no where as a Board!

What the hell happened to Snake anyhow?!?!?

Thieves and crooks get shorter sentences!

Can’t we just sort it out!

And I agree what a shambolic thread of slop posting.

Anyway.........

 

[Hearts to hearts]

Snake Baker would not allow this, I'm actually stupider for reading the last few pages. Am actually not sure what is going on.

Snake would be derailing it in his own special way. Actually the thread would be invisible to the many who have had to put him on ignore.

 

[Del191229]

Mods:

Can someone start a "Grammar" thread please?

Shouldn't it be

Mods: please start a thread on grammar?

 

[Waynesworld]

If you go past the grammar, which I’m sure even you WW can do, if not, get help, then some of what RR said is actually true. Cannington and his twin Cunnington have been pretty average as far as centre bounces go. Ziebs is actually better in the forward than the midfield and we do actually need at least 4 inside mids. Hopefully with shoulder repairs LDU becomes one.
So.. if you go past his illiteracy RR makes some valid comments.

So I will ask this question again. If Cunnington has been so average why does the oppositions best tagger go to him each week???

Or is it simply that both you and Rad Roo know more than both ours and opposition AFL coaches?

 

[Sillygit]

Some would say its better the club isnt leaking like a sieve on who we're chasing, but it clearly comes at a cost to this thread.

 

[blackshadow]

I reckon he forgot to put Zurharrrr in there to make 5. He's our rickman isn't he?

I thought our Rickman was Hans Gruber...

 

[Seriously!]

Snake Baker would not allow this, I'm actually stupider for reading the last few pages. Am actually not sure what is going on.

Is that even possible?

 

[Seriously!]

So I will ask this question again. If Cunnington has been so average why does the oppositions best tagger go to him each week???

Or is it simply that both you and Rad Roo know more than both ours and opposition AFL coaches?

No, we can probably read.
Both of us have said he is great, just not at centre bounce clearances.
You really do need to read more carefully.

 

[Seriously!]

I think we can all understand the difference in a spelling error versus a predictive text scenario.

Grammar and spelling affects people in different ways, as does slow midfielders, poor defensive application and lefty wowsers and right-wing nutters.

This thread has ALL of the above.

As much as I think you're a bit of crackhead, I'm still happy enough to read your nonsense until the end of the Draft and FA period.

Does that mean you promise to close your account after that or are you just teasing?

 

[Seriously!]

Don't go there please, it's unbecoming. We are all on the same side after all. Unless you are a Murdoch 'journalist' or 'commentator' and I use both terms advisedly.

You’d be a teacher then?

 

[LuvtheKangas]

You’d be a teacher then?

Maybe he's an ex-player?