So whats the substance of the Mr V'L claims?
None you'd have to assume otherwise surely he would have provided something of substance? VLandys quotes in that article are bluster.
Do you not think if the actual figure wasn't a 25% reduction for the NRL then an alternative number would have been put out there?
The only facts VLandys provided are damning ones:
“The proof is in the pudding,” he says. “We’re giving NRL clubs more money, the players have only taken a 20 per cent cut and we’ve got no borrowings. We’re very comfortable where we are at.”
This thing is going to hurt for them for a long long time