2020 Non-Crows AFL Discussion

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
But you can't move the ball with speed in the modern era if your players are cooked on the field. Skill errors would be through the roof, and burst speed would disappear from the game. Players would be encouraged to move the ball more slowly and retain more possession to avoid skill errors.

We are, in combination with the 6-6-6 rule, seeing more of that in modern football, whereas less of those things happened with unlimited interchanges.

In my opinion, tiring players makes them worse at football (this is generally common sense), and therefore makes the game worse
The opposite is true. You move the ball with long kicking and rely on your forwards to win the one on ones.
Burst players aren't eliminated, fitter players will still be able to run hard, no one ever crawled on hands and knees when there were no interchange.
As for players moving the ball more slowly and retaining possession what do you think is happening now.
The ball gets chipped around and around, the whole exercise is to retain possession until a gap or player opens up. It is boring football because players are so skilled that mistakes rarely happen until they move the ball into a congested forward line where players have run back to help their defenders. Sure you do get some counter attacks but at present it is like how soccer is played.
We are seeing more of this crap in modern football because coaches value defensive pressure and defensive help and maintaining possession. One on one contests are rare because players can make multiple leads until they are free of an opponent and can then be used. If they get tired they come off and a fresh player can play the exact same way.
Tiring players doesn't make football worse it creates more opportunities for players to shine by working harder than their opposition. The game now days is so clinical but by tiring players the game eventually opens up, it may take a few quarters but we need more mistakes not less to give the opposition more chance to win the ball. To me it just makes common sense.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

The opposite is true. You move the ball with long kicking and rely on your forwards to win the one on ones.
Burst players aren't eliminated, fitter players will still be able to run hard, no one ever crawled on hands and knees when there were no interchange.
As for players moving the ball more slowly and retaining possession what do you think is happening now.
The ball gets chipped around and around, the whole exercise is to retain possession until a gap or player opens up. It is boring football because players are so skilled that mistakes rarely happen until they move the ball into a congested forward line where players have run back to help their defenders. Sure you do get some counter attacks but at present it is like how soccer is played.
We are seeing more of this crap in modern football because coaches value defensive pressure and defensive help and maintaining possession. One on one contests are rare because players can make multiple leads until they are free of an opponent and can then be used. If they get tired they come off and a fresh player can play the exact same way.
Tiring players doesn't make football worse it creates more opportunities for players to shine by working harder than their opposition. The game now days is so clinical but by tiring players the game eventually opens up, it may take a few quarters but we need more mistakes not less to give the opposition more chance to win the ball. To me it just makes common sense.

We are getting chip around football precisely because of the interchange cap. Players are taking the safe option to avoid skill errors they'd more likely commit as a fatigued player. Ball movement is slow and stagnant, teams struggle to execute basic skills to get out of packs, theres a lot of garbage pressure football because being in the right spot to tackle is easier than being a skilled user of the football. Coaches are forcing players to run off their ass to get into position, at the expense of anything else in the game. That will get worse with an increased cap

Essentially what you are arguing for is players to make more mistakes on purpose. Force them to make mistakes. That goes against what sport should be about. As the game evolves, players should be getting more skilled, not less.

Yes, with unlimited interchange, we had more zone breaking possession football demonstrated by teams like Hawthorn. But we also had contested beast teams like Sydney. Since the cap, the dominant style has become low skilled pressure mauls
 
We are getting chip around football precisely because of the interchange cap. Players are taking the safe option to avoid skill errors they'd more likely commit as a fatigued player. Ball movement is slow and stagnant, teams struggle to execute basic skills to get out of packs, theres a lot of garbage pressure football because being in the right spot to tackle is easier than being a skilled user of the football. Coaches are forcing players to run off their ass to get into position, at the expense of anything else in the game. That will get worse with an increased cap

Essentially what you are arguing for is players to make more mistakes on purpose. Force them to make mistakes. That goes against what sport should be about. As the game evolves, players should be getting more skilled, not less.

Yes, with unlimited interchange, we had more zone breaking possession football demonstrated by teams like Hawthorn. But we also had contested beast teams like Sydney. Since the cap, the dominant style has become low skilled pressure mauls
I agree we are getting chip around football because of the interchange cap it's too high.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top