Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You would think we might have to sign him up for 3 to get him here.
So could ultimately be at the expense of a Lane or Smith or even Fullarton or Payne.
He'd replace Fullarton and it'll be an upgrade right away for the next year or two.
Wherever he ends up, and whether or not the Hawks chip in $, the receiving club won’t have to cough up very much. They’re shopping around a 30yr old contracted fringe player to make extra room in their rebuild, not a 27yr old first choice ruck.Hawks are going to want one of our first round picks if they’re paying part of his salary.
Hawthorn will be chasing top 30 picks for their rebuild.I doubt they'd be asking for a first round pick for a 30 year old ruckman even if they were paying part of his salary.
Maybe they'd ask whichever team Gubby Allen is now working for, but only in hope.
Big call signing a 30 year old ruckman who is getting pushed out of the Hawks to a three year deal.
I'd be nervous giving him 3 years with Lane, Fullarton, Smith and Hipwood coming back later in the year. Ceglar might be the best this year but I wouldn't be surprised to see Fullarton and Lane overtake him by the end of the season.Looks like Ceglar has both us and Dogs as options. If we want him longer contract is the easier carrot we can offer. We have a habit of giving it too, CEY for example. I'm not saying Fullarton doesn't have scope to improve - Ceglar would be ahead of him right now / next year.
Looks like Ceglar has both us and Dogs as options. If we want him longer contract is the easier carrot we can offer. We have a habit of giving it too, CEY for example. I'm not saying Fullarton doesn't have scope to improve - Ceglar would be ahead of him right now / next year.
Thanks - Interesting because my recollection of what has been reported in the media differs - does this mean the cuts have to be paid back over future years?We did ask them to take a pay cut in 2020 and they did take a pay cut.
Not the 2020 year.Thanks - Interesting because my recollection of what has been reported in the media differs - does this mean the cuts have to be paid back over future years?
If Ceglar and Oscar are having good seasons coinciding with Hipwood's return, that'll be a good problem to have in my view. We were at the other end of that scale this year and struggled badly with no second and third tall cover.
That being said, Ceglar would be too expensive trade wise compared to Fort. This will be a challenge to get done.
Fort is contracted, so won’t be “free”, just cheaper.It would good, for sure. Just means that one of the big 5 are injured or in the ressies for it to work - so your ideal scenario is one where someone who should be playing, isn't.
And the issue with Cegler is, you would need to commit to the 2 ruck model, or the resting ruck forward model - Fagan has shown time and time again he likes conistancy.
As long as Hippy, Joe and McStay are in the same forward line - we are commited to the resting forward/ruck model IMO.
Bringing in Fort for free still works because him being in the ressies is ok on 120k a year, Cegler or Big O in the ressies, not so much.
Suns just traded away their second round pick pick in that trade.Suns now have they’re 2nd round pick and a Future 2nd from Collingwood would we trade our future first round and 3rd round picks to the Suns for both giving Us 3 2nd round picks next year and enough points for Ashcroft and Fletcher
No they still have their future 2nd which is what I’m looking atSuns just traded away their second round pick pick in that trade.
They have pick 19, but if you want it, you also have to take on Darcy Macpherson in a salary dump trade.
They traded away their second round pick this year. You misread my post, somehow.No they still have their future 2nd which is what I’m looking at
I wasn’t talking about this years 2nd round pickThey traded away their second round pick this year. You misread my post, somehow.
Your first post I quoted,I wasn’t talking about this years 2nd round pick
Oh you misunderstood my post I meant trading our future 1st and 3rd round picks for both of their future 2ndsYour first post I quoted,
“Suns now have their 2nd round pick and a Future 2nd from Collingwood, would we trade our future first round and 3rd round picks to the Suns for both”
So you said would we trade our future first (+ a 3rd round pick) round pick for the Suns current and future second round picks.
And I said, “the Suns just traded away their second round pick” in this year’s draft.
My bad.Oh you misunderstood my post I meant trading our future 1st and 3rd round picks for both of their future 2nds
Fort is contracted, so won’t be “free”, just cheaper.