Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 2 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Yes but the club is trying atmHe's already contracted for next season, not as much rush on that one.
F*ck Kyrgios!Ok. Where are we at as supporters if it has to be (assuming we attain Jackson):
A) get rid of Lobb keep Logue
B) get rid of Logue keep Lobb (+ 2 year extension)
I gather we can keep both or lose both and their deals may be dependent on cash or whatever BUT not what I'm asking.
Everything else being equal who would we rather keep?
Haters are going to hate, but I'll say keep Lobb and extend for 2 years. Reality is keep Logue and gather currency from Lobb leaving.
Can we keep both and grab Jackson?
Does someone else request out?
Does Kyrios win?
So many questions!
I think Lobb would make a bigger difference in the next 1-2 years, but realistically I think our best challenging period is 2-5 years so I'd prefer Logue.Ok. Where are we at as supporters if it has to be (assuming we attain Jackson):
A) get rid of Lobb keep Logue
B) get rid of Logue keep Lobb (+ 2 year extension)
I gather we can keep both or lose both and their deals may be dependent on cash or whatever BUT not what I'm asking.
Everything else being equal who would we rather keep?
Haters are going to hate, but I'll say keep Lobb and extend for 2 years. Reality is keep Logue and gather currency from Lobb leaving.
Can we keep both and grab Jackson?
Does someone else request out?
Does Kyrios win?
So many questions!
If Jackson's a fait accompli We have to let Lobb go - as is his wish.Ok. Where are we at as supporters if it has to be (assuming we attain Jackson):
A) get rid of Lobb keep Logue
B) get rid of Logue keep Lobb (+ 2 year extension)
I gather we can keep both or lose both and their deals may be dependent on cash or whatever BUT not what I'm asking.
Everything else being equal who would we rather keep?
Haters are going to hate, but I'll say keep Lobb and extend for 2 years. Reality is keep Logue and gather currency from Lobb leaving.
Can we keep both and grab Jackson?
Does someone else request out?
Does Kyrios win?
So many questions!
Unfortunately unlike other clubs, we seem to have a cap limitFyfe’s 1.3 million dollar contract ends 2023(?) I think. He’ll be negotiated down a lot. Unless he comes out flying next year, he’ll be in that 5-600k bracket. As Mundy put it, old man money.
I said it in another thread but;
Luke Jackson, Angus Brayshaw this year…
Lobb extension for 2 years
Keep Logue
Get Shai Bolton end of 2023…
Flagmantle
Unfortunately unlike other clubs, we seem to have a cap limit
Haha, there’s good spots and there’s adding over 2m of salary to your books per year while keeping your playersWe signed Brayshaw for 600k, well unders. I’m not sure we have over paid anyone at the moment. We’re in a good spot.
What happened to your inside info on Pearce? And why do you suddenly seem optimistic about Ryan signing?Now we just need Ryan to sign!
Unfortunately unlike other clubs, we seem to have a cap limit
You misunderstood me bud. My inside info was for Ryan. With Pearce I just agreed with the general consensus that should Tassie create a team, he would be a risk to join them. As other people have pointed out, a Tassie team is years away therefore helping us to secure Pearce. The only thing you should take away from my comment is that while Ryan is a flight risk, there is nothing to suggest he will be requesting a trade. I'm sure this discussion will arise again when we get to the end of his current contract.What happened to your inside info on Pearce? And why do you suddenly seem optimistic about Ryan signing?
I believe Meek has 1 year leftI'm expecting Meek to get a significant offer from some other club (don't expect him to stay if Jackson comes), obviously that ups our compensation. Would love to see a 1 year deal so we could actually sign and trade him.
This is on the expectation we pick up Jackson and Lobb goes. We then need to sign a journeyman ruck to play at Peel. Also I think Treacy is an ideal 25% ruck.
So we end up with in terms of ruck/forwards:
- Lobb, Meek
+ Darcy, Jackson, Journeyman, Treacy?
Big negative on Forward ability however youth is on our side and Jackson/Treacy only get better up there.
We would have put money aside for Cerra that we didn't need. Lobb wants out. That frees up the money for Jackson.
We lost the 2013 GF because Zach Clarke was crap and Hawthorn were able to double team Pav. Many beleive if Kepler or even Jonathon Griffin were available we would have won.
If you get the chance to recruit a 199cm match winner you take it IMO.
Absolutely. Just last week, for instance, a player got subbed out for "hamstring awareness" and this week he's straight back in without a blink of an eye.I still have a gripe with that blatant tactical medical sub used by Collingwood.
That goggley-eyed Cox has a s**t game, comes off with a sore finger and replaced by a forward that boots three goals.
This medical sub rule needs to get looked at.
My feeling is that maybe if a player is subbed out they should miss the next week. If an injury is bad enough to have to come out of the game it’s bad enough to need a week’s rehab. While it will unfortunately catch a few legit ones (like Tabs last week being ok for this week), it might stop clubs abusing the rule. Yes that would mean Tabs would be unavailable this week, but so be it. Maybe allow them to play at the lower level if they are magically over the injury that put them out in the first place.I still have a gripe with that blatant tactical medical sub used by Collingwood.
That goggley-eyed Cox has a s**t game, comes off with a sore finger and replaced by a forward that boots three goals.
This medical sub rule needs to get looked at.
At least in our instance it most certainly wasn't advantageous to execute that sub...Absolutely. Just last week, for instance, a player got subbed out for "hamstring awareness" and this week he's straight back in without a blink of an eye.