WaynesWorld19
Moderator
- Moderator
- #468
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Doing this too, but subject to change if Macrae Jnr can convince me.No ....staying with 5 Mids ...Neale at M5
Will only take 2 of the 3 premium Rookies ....and a no to Finlay Macrae
No ....staying with 5 Mids ...Neale at M5
Will only take 2 of the 3 premium Rookies ....and a no to Finlay Macrae
Doing this too, but subject to change if Macrae Jnr can convince me.
Tracc worries me as someone who's just as likely to score 130 as he is to score 85. I'd still take him with Steele, since Steele was R1P1 for me (Belco represent) but I feel like the $30k gap would be worth it if you can find the room.I've been tossing up between Macrae-Titch-Walsh-Neale, and Macrae-Steele-Petracca-Neale. Leaning towards the second. Then Rowell, JHF, Daicos, Ward.
Running Premo's in the midfield .....3 premo's / 2 mid-pricers / 1 rookie in the fwds ....counting Cogs as a mid-pricerDo you faith in the cheapos, or running a mid-price-madness side? I know it's early and there's plenty of time for rookies to appear, but as of right now, all the ticks are in the middle, and unfortunately they're all expensive.
I have 10 cheapos (sub $150k) and I'm not confident any of them play lol
Neale at M5 is my dream
Neale at M4 is my hope
Neale at M3 is my reality
I have Whitfield at D5 lol. Just like last season, I reckon we'll struggle for 3 cheap, playing def rookiesRunning Premo's in the midfield .....3 premo's / 2 mid-pricers / 1 rookie in the fwds ....counting Cogs as a mid-pricer
In DEF ...running 3 Premo's .....but will add a mid-pricer at D4
I'm more worried by the FWD Rookies at the momentI have Whitfield at D5 lol. Just like last season, I reckon we'll struggle for 3 cheap, playing def rookies
Highmore, Sharp and Kozi played in 2021. Lots took a donut at D8 instead of one of them though
When he went mid and got CBAs he actually scored worse than when he was in defenseIrrelevant stat. I don’t think he’s a great pick because he’s priced at his maximum but if you pick Crisp you’re picking him because of his new role which has nothing to do with Moore or Howe and you’re picking him for his outstanding durability. Upgrade target for me though.
Because bont goes up and down and will eventually drop to sub 600k. Macrae is fairly steady and a fantastic captain option.no one has bont. no one has nicnat. no one has taranto. (no one being the same cookie cutter teams up here that i idolise and obsess over).
why no love for bont?? an extra 50k from macrae goes a long way.
No he did not. He doesn’t have to get the bulk of the CBAs to be playing midfield btw.When he went mid and got CBAs he actually scored worse than when he was in defense
My view is Bont has a higher ceiling and generally throws out a couple 170 - 200 games each year but at the same time is liable to to throw out a 60 - 80 which can be costly in leagues.no one has bont. no one has nicnat. no one has taranto. (no one being the same cookie cutter teams up here that i idolise and obsess over).
why no love for bont?? an extra 50k from macrae goes a long way.
no one has bont. no one has nicnat. no one has taranto. (no one being the same cookie cutter teams up here that i idolise and obsess over).
why no love for bont?? an extra 50k from macrae goes a long way.
A fit and firing Dunkley seems to impact Bonts SuperCoach scores quite significantly.no one has bont. no one has nicnat. no one has taranto. (no one being the same cookie cutter teams up here that i idolise and obsess over).
why no love for bont?? an extra 50k from macrae goes a long way.
Only reason I don’t have Taranto is the chatter that he could play majority forward while Greene is out.no one has bont. no one has nicnat. no one has taranto. (no one being the same cookie cutter teams up here that i idolise and obsess over).
why no love for bont?? an extra 50k from macrae goes a long way.
Did you have any specific criteria in terms of ownership % when selecting this? I just checked and 5 of the top 12 averaging mids from last year are at 4% ownership or lower. Staggering. Lyons, Zerrett, Parish, Guthrie and Laird.He you go SPOD team with Bont VC, Nicnat Capt + Cogs and top rookies. Send me booze when you win a weekly.
View attachment 1323359
Did you have any specific criteria in terms of ownership % when selecting this? I just checked and 5 of the top 12 averaging mids from last year are at 4% ownership or lower. Staggering. Lyons, Zerrett, Parish, Guthrie and Laird.
Lyons is the one that interests me, but I'm taking Neale so don't want another Lion. He's a great pick though, tackles a lot, and is consistent so he will be a POD all year.Did you have any specific criteria in terms of ownership % when selecting this? I just checked and 5 of the top 12 averaging mids from last year are at 4% ownership or lower. Staggering. Lyons, Zerrett, Parish, Guthrie and Laird.
Lyons is the one that interests me, but I'm taking Neale so don't want another Lion. He's a great pick though, tackles a lot, and is consistent so he will be a POD all year.
Zerrett meh, small chol'd kent. Parish pissed his pants when he got tagged last year. Shiel and Caldwell back in there too.
Laird was a defender so doesn't really fit, suspect he's priced at his maximum, and given Adelaide will cope a few floggings this year you'll probably get him cheaper.
Can't see Guthrie going big again, that was weird. As weird as his dainty little steps.