WaynesWorld19
Moderator
- Moderator
- #468
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If I believed Hewett and Weller were premos the captain options can be fixed.
View attachment 1343595
4 is enough.
I did that a couple of seasons ago. Visited this forum a day or so before the start and basically cobbled together a team based on everyone else's. Had my best start ever but my trading "prowess" dropped me back to mid table rabble soon after...Gonna make my team 5 minutes before the first bounce of the round while pissed for maximum epicness.
6 upgrades needed from 35 trades.Macrae/Neale/Gawn/Grundy is 4 legit VC/C options.
Assuming all 16 of your non rookies are keepers, that's still 6 upgrades on the hardest line to upgrade. Don't know why anyone would want to put themselves through all that tbh. Most of the time the easiest early upgrades are to fallen defender or forward premiums in the 400k-450k range. Gun midfielders are usually still 550k+ for the most part even they bottom out.
Do it! It might just work and if it doesn't what's the worst that can happen?Thinking totally outside the Box this year and going 10 mid price players and 20 rookies
My aim is to win my league by making as much cash as possible and just make finals then have cash to burn
anybody tried this and if yes what was the result or pitfalls
6 upgrades needed from 35 trades.
I can do 4 down and 1 up, 6 times and still have 5 trades for injuries.
This is easier to upgrade to a finished team because it has more keepers.
Not harder.
The problem is missing break out candidates in the forwards and defence.
And not having the correct captain options.
I would assume 1224 downgrade trades?
i think we're in the same BF division, we can share rabblenessI did that a couple of seasons ago. Visited this forum a day or so before the start and basically cobbled together a team based on everyone else's. Had my best start ever but my trading "prowess" dropped me back to mid table rabble soon after...
First time poster here. Keen for any thoughts on running three premium forward versus 2 premium rucks.would look to upgrade Witts after generating some cash.View attachment 1343283View attachment 1343284
Too light on in MIDs for mine. Stewart at D1 is nuts for mine. Pretty much maxed. Lloyd or Crisp much better value.Okie dokie, here's my sixth iteration.
To recap, this is my first go at SC, so any feedback would be great.
$129k in the bank so some on the bench can be upgraded when teams are confirmed if necessary.
New additions have been Stewart, Sicily, Brodie. Heeney, Martin and Chapman taken away.
I quite liked their value, but the more I've tried to imagine how the season plays out, the more I struggled to see comparative value in the defence rookies compared to their mid and fwd counterparts. No doubt there will be some there, but it feels harder to predict, so I just decided to have my backline dominated by a combination of evergreens and undervalued premos, with the idea that cash gen will be easier to manage on the other lines.
Non-premo rookies aside, the two I feel most uncertain about are Brodie and Sicily. Toying with alternatives for both.
Over to you.
View attachment 1343682
Haven’t gone that drastic before. Have done a heap of rookies (every one named) and then filled in the rest with Premos. Had about a million in the bank. Didn’t trade until Round 5. Absolutely hammered leagues. Had two trades every week of league finals and shitloads of cash.Thinking totally outside the Box this year and going 10 mid price players and 20 rookies
My aim is to win my league by making as much cash as possible and just make finals then have cash to burn
anybody tried this and if yes what was the result or pitfalls
probably, but if you’re prepared to sacrifice Rowell you should be able to get it to work.Current team relies on a few cheap rookies playing - am I being unrealistic?
View attachment 1343639
View attachment 1343641
Hmm. But Lloyd and Stewart's season averages for 2021 are basically identical, and yet Lloyd's last 3 week average was 124.7 while Stewart's was 114.3. Also, the Swans defence has changed over the past six months, and I'm a bit skeptical that Lloyd is going to play the same role in the Swans' grid going forward. His performance in the preseason hasn't helped that suspicion.Too light on in MIDs for mine. Stewart at D1 is nuts for mine. Pretty much maxed. Lloyd or Crisp much better value.
Dawson (who was stealing seagulls kickins and rebounds) has gone to the Crows. Expect the gull to return to 2019/2020 form.Hmm. But Lloyd and Stewart's season averages for 2021 are basically identical, and yet Lloyd's last 3 week average was 124.7 while Stewart's was 114.3. Also, the Swans defence has changed over the past six months, and I'm a bit skeptical that Lloyd is going to play the same role in the Swans' grid going forward. His performance in the preseason hasn't helped that suspicion.
Crisp and Ridley seem like comparatively good value. I've strongly considered the latter. Thing is... I can't see Chris Scott altering Tom Stewart's role and he's just a wonderful player that I love watching as a neutral. So there's a bit me going with what I know and trust.
Not sure I agree. Dawson was playing mostly wing so didn’t impact Lloyd so much. To me, Sydney look like they are trying to be faster out of defence, with Blakey and Campbell being given more rebounding opportunity.Dawson (who was stealing seagulls kickins and rebounds) has gone to the Crows. Expect the gull to return to 2019/2020 form.
Crisp has moved to MID and never misses a game. Upside everywhere.
Stewart has little improvement IMO. You’re paying max price for him.
You could be right about the improvement side of things, but the flipside is that Stewart's lowest price in 2021 was higher than either Lloyd or Crisp.Dawson (who was stealing seagulls kickins and rebounds) has gone to the Crows. Expect the gull to return to 2019/2020 form.
Crisp has moved to MID and never misses a game. Upside everywhere.
Stewart has little improvement IMO. You’re paying max price for him.
Good question. Following your sharemarket analogy - I think you need a mix of blue chips and undervalued companies for your Premo picks.You could be right about the improvement side of things, but the flipside is that Stewart's lowest price in 2021 was higher than either Lloyd or Crisp.
Sorry for the n00b question, but does it actually matter if your premos don't considerably increase in value, so long as their results remain consistently among the highest? Like how much more are you expecting Grundy and Gawn to go up in value?
I'm just thinking of a sharemarket comparison. Something like Apple. You pay a premium for it, and the returns are no where near as crazy if you're on-the-ball enough to invest in a unicorn, but its been a reliable moneyspinner for mum and dad investors for years because its practically guaranteed to make products that people want to buy. So long as Stewart isn't injured (a valid concern, to be sure) he is absolutely integral to how Geelong play football. And I'm quite bearish on Geelong's stocks this year (unlike the Swans), so I reckon the ball is going spend a whole lot of time in their defence.
Yes but on the sharemarket, as in SC, sell high, buy low.You could be right about the improvement side of things, but the flipside is that Stewart's lowest price in 2021 was higher than either Lloyd or Crisp.
Sorry for the n00b question, but does it actually matter if your premos don't considerably increase in value, so long as their results remain consistently among the highest? Like how much more are you expecting Grundy and Gawn to go up in value?
I'm just thinking of a sharemarket comparison. Something like Apple. You pay a premium for it, and the returns are no where near as crazy if you're on-the-ball enough to invest in a unicorn, but its been a reliable moneyspinner for mum and dad investors for years because its practically guaranteed to make products that people want to buy. So long as Stewart isn't injured (a valid concern, to be sure) he is absolutely integral to how Geelong play football. And I'm quite bearish on Geelong's stocks this year (unlike the Swans), so I reckon the ball is going spend a whole lot of time in their defence.