Position 2022 Rookies

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.

As others have said, this kid Carroll is HUGELY rated internally. Bottom ager in his draft year, still only 19 after 2 pre-seasons.

Feel like Durdin is a good chance of going out though if this is true. Not exactly similar players but not sure we'll throw the kid to the wolves in the guts/on a wing to start with.
few wookies coming up..
dempsey
strnadica
curtis
mccomb

then we have those on the bubble as soon as theyre named..
erasmus
skinner
mcentee
wanganeen

let alone clark and hollands still to come..
This looks good on paper but then...

Dempsey - has zero JS.
Strnadicaptain - for the story but how are you picking him? Grundy being injured means everyone has Preuss and Hayes. Even then, does he go straight back out for Dixon?
Curtis - looked good. Plays in shit side so should get games. One to watch
McComb - didn't exactly set the house on fire. Dogs board seemed a bit baffled as to why he was picked. Does he even stay in?

Erasmus - expensive, poor JS, Fyfe due back earlier than expected
Skinner - not very good, poor JS
McEntee - 43 and 33 in two games as MID/FWD doesn't exactly scream "pick me" when on the bubble

Wanganeen -

Screen Shot 2022-04-27 at 9.04.30 pm.png

Honestly the only one of those I'd be really keen to pick at this stage is Curtis. The rest either have rubbish JS or haven't really proven to have any decent scoring potential. If McComb stays in I hope he goes a lot better this week
 
As others have said, this kid Carroll is HUGELY rated internally. Bottom ager in his draft year, still only 19 after 2 pre-seasons.

Feel like Durdin is a good chance of going out though if this is true. Not exactly similar players but not sure we'll throw the kid to the wolves in the guts/on a wing to start with.

This looks good on paper but then...

Dempsey - has zero JS.
Strnadicaptain - for the story but how are you picking him? Grundy being injured means everyone has Preuss and Hayes. Even then, does he go straight back out for Dixon?
Curtis - looked good. Plays in shit side so should get games. One to watch
McComb - didn't exactly set the house on fire. Dogs board seemed a bit baffled as to why he was picked. Does he even stay in?

Erasmus - expensive, poor JS, Fyfe due back earlier than expected
Skinner - not very good, poor JS
McEntee - 43 and 33 in two games as MID/FWD doesn't exactly scream "pick me" when on the bubble

Wanganeen -

View attachment 1385504

Honestly the only one of those I'd be really keen to pick at this stage is Curtis. The rest either have rubbish JS or haven't really proven to have any decent scoring potential. If McComb stays in I hope he goes a lot better this week
Yep Dempsey, desperate peeps gunna desperate.

1651059496262.png
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Sam is lead to believe, he's potentially sure, he think's it's a chance that he's maybe about to perhaps know something.
I've been there but yeah even I knew I was going to end up touching cloth.
 

But yeah I noticed that on their injury list page. The latest reports don't populate on that page, can only find them in 'news'
Good news. Today the Suns website as updated to say what the AFL website said yesterday.
 
Hobbs had some moments but he looked a little lost out there. Didn’t scream pick me.

NMartin on the other hand is a jet. Watched closely. Runs all over the ground and gets into good position to get the ball. Reads the play really well and very clean/clever by hand/foot. I was really impressed with him.
Yeah but everyone has him, so no one cares. 😉
 
Good news. Today the Suns website as updated to say what the AFL website said yesterday.
Nope. The AFL injury report hasn't been updated since yesterday. No mention of Powell. Clear proof that AFL injury report updates PRIOR to official club updates are done by journos. Obviously some of the info is good, because they have sources at clubs, see players getting scanned, etc, but for the most part, there's a lot of guesswork, so it's best to wait for the club to post the injury report.

Screenshot_20220427-224222_AFL.jpg Screenshot_20220427-224244_Chrome.jpg
 
Good news. Today the Suns website as updated to say what the AFL website said yesterday.

OK..enough.

I've been led to believe that the piss weak, understaffed, poorly paid Suns media dept does the local things, such as the small video snippets you see of training day, or an interview after training, but all the stuff that concerns the greater AFL scene is controlled by the AFL.

Being a Suns member, I also lodged a complaint about lack of info a few months back, and that is what I learned......so give it a break...and spend more time looking at your own Clubs failings.......I'm sure there's plenty of them.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

y u do dis

Temp the SC Gods and we'll all suffer!
I was going to trade in Worner from freo as a d/m 102k loop.
31 and 27 possessions in the Wafl the last 2 weeks.
But Clark will actually score well IMO.
I can still get my loop later on.
 
Why ?

Why not wait , With so many eagles players due back he might only get 2 games then ded for 6-7 weeks
wait for him to show what he has in 2 games and if he gets selected for the 3rd to mitigate risk
because the alternative is to trade in a loophole like I originally planned.
With all the carnage floating around I will take the 1st game player as I don't need a loop.
I took Noddy at the start of the year as my loop.
Nothing wrong with going early on one or two rookies a year.
 
because the alternative is to trade in a loophole like I originally planned.
With all the carnage floating around I will take the 1st game player as I don't need a loop.
I took Noddy at the start of the year as my loop.
Nothing wrong with going early on one or two rookies a year.
I dont get why you need a loop this week ?

You mention the alternative is to trade in a loop like you planned but on the next line you mention you dont need a loop with all the carnage ?
Nothing to gain unless you are copping a donut imo

your team looks good enough not to go early
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top