Cripps2Walsh
Debutant
Also, if it is wet, I would like to see a minimum of 6 long sleeves out there please.
JSOS, looking at you to get the ball rolling mate.
JSOS, looking at you to get the ball rolling mate.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Work ethic where?I can't imagine it being a particularly strong message given that he has already missed the first 2 matches. It's not as if he is lacking in professionalism/work ethic.
Nothing wrong with his work ethic imo.Work ethic where?
On the training track, or in games?
His work ethic in games is pretty cringe
Weather forecast is for light rain most of the day,who does that favour?
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
There's a reason why he hasn't started the first two games of the year under the new regimeNothing wrong with his work ethic imo.
He has a decent crack .
If Plowman doesn't get selected for tonight's game given the outs, our coaches are making a massive statement.
I'm not fussed if he does, out of necessity, but I'll also be very happy in the message they're sending if he doesn't.
There's a reason why he hasn't started the first two games of the year under the new regime
Work ethic where?
On the training track, or in games?
His work ethic in games is pretty cringe
It's not work ethic. He's commonly in the top 5 for distance run in a game.... Kinda blows the work ethic comment apartThere's a reason why he hasn't started the first two games of the year under the new regime
Or he had an injury issue late in the pre-season?Seems Voss/Hamill don't like him, which is their choice.
Lots of Plowman apologists on here
"He runs a lot in games"; then the argument is what is he actually doing? Because his impact is minimal, if not often negative
Sorry to have upset you all. He's just not that good
Blanketing players like Charlie Cameron and Papley is minimal impact?
He has consistently played on the oppositions' best small or medium forward. There's a reason he's been so high in the B&F the last few years.
Some 'supporters' are too blind to see it.
That's not what you said. Take your old man know it all attitude and turn it into a coherent argument. You slung shit about work ethic and got shot down. So youve changed tac. It's clear you don't like him and it's probably some bull shit like he smiled after a loss and has nothing to do with his playing ability. If you don't like him cool? But don't make up shit about work ethic.Lots of Plowman apologists on here
"He runs a lot in games"; then the argument is what is he actually doing? Because his impact is minimal, if not often negative
Sorry to have upset you all. He's just not that good
I don't think it's his ability that is the issue anymore. Our defence is not playing the man-on-man that we have in the pervious few years, which suited Plow. Now it's a sliding style which seems to suit others in our line up. I think his spot is now as the 3rd tall because of the smalls we have back there but he is just a bit short and doesn't have the spring to play that position. Time will tell. IMHO
Which is completely fine and if he's not up to it in this system then oh well. A fair enough argument. Unlike the shit slinging of cookie.I don't think it's his ability that is the issue anymore. Our defence is not playing the man-on-man that we have in the pervious few years, which suited Plow. Now it's a sliding style which seems to suit others in our line up. I think his spot is now as the 3rd tall because of the smalls we have back there but he is just a bit short and doesn't have the spring to play that position. Time will tell. IMHO
Lots of Plowman apologists on here
"He runs a lot in games"; then the argument is what is he actually doing? Because his impact is minimal, if not often negative
Sorry to have upset you all. He's just not that good
We'll see.
Given that he had some issue late in the pre-season, I'm not sure that we can say it's been decided already.
Man-on-man or zone in defence, I'd still pick Plow over Newman. But I'm happy to back Voss at the moment.
Another that can't separate bias from reality
"Side/coaches are doing well, better than past players/coaches, but will be better again if they heed my opinion"
Maybe read what I posted again?
We'll see.
Given that he had some issue late in the pre-season, I'm not sure that we can say it's been decided already.
Man-on-man or zone in defence, I'd still pick Plow over Newman. But I'm happy to back Voss at the moment.