- Thread starter
- #26
I don't think Fisher is in our future 22 either.
Hope he's on a low salary, for the club to contract him until 2025.
It's a fine line
Had an improved year and probably remains best 22
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 6 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
I don't think Fisher is in our future 22 either.
Hope he's on a low salary, for the club to contract him until 2025.
I don't think Fisher is in our future 22 either.
Hope he's on a low salary, for the club to contract him until 2025.
plays a role.It's a fine line
Had an improved year and probably remains best 22
There’s a few like Motlop, Cottrell, Fisher, Pitto, TDK, Stocker, Boyd, Durdin, JSOS who I wouldn’t argue against being in peoples best 22 but all could easily be replaced next year. Not that they are crap but they are your bottom players who you would hope improve or are improved on.plays a role.
I know this is a hypothetical everyone is fit type thread, but well, you know…
is going to fit in that 23-28 place on the list and will play more often than not.
Would leave Motlop off that list. 19 odd, first year in and looks a jet in the making. TDK will continue to develop still a year or two away from taking a decision. As for the rest interesting to see how the cookie crumbles next season. It is that cohort that is our biggest issue.There’s a few like Motlop, Cottrell, Fisher, Pitto, TDK, Stocker, Boyd, Durdin, JSOS who I wouldn’t argue against being in peoples best 22 but all could easily be replaced next year. Not that they are crap but they are your bottom players who you would hope improve or are improved on.
I’m more going just on this seasons form. If Motlop and TDK don’t improve then they aren’t up to it. I fully expect they will and have both in my best 22. Durdin is another I rate ridiculously high for someone who wasn’t quite upto it this year.Would leave Motlop off that list. 19 odd, first year in and looks a jet in the making. TDK will continue to develop still a year or two away from taking a decision. As for the rest interesting to see how the cookie crumbles next season. It is that cohort that is our biggest issue.
That is a very tall forward line. How are you dealing with the 4 different aerial threats up forward not getting in each other's way and the issues we had with rebounding HBF's this year?Very early to nail this down without having a trade or draft period, but we can focus on the players we have on our list to start building a consensus
Boyd Wetering Williams
Marchbank Durdin Saad
TDK Hewett Doc
Cottrell Cripps Walsh
Gov Young C Curnow
Mots Harry Durdin
Int: Newman Kennedy Cerra Martin
Emg: Kemp Carroll Fisher Jsos
Still in the mix, Pitto LOB, Setters, Stocker, Owies, Cuners, Honey. The rest of the players would at this stage be injury depth
Made some changes to roles, as I prefer to play both Young and TDK in the ruck, so have included Durdin as a KPD. Need more agility so would leave Doc in the guts. I feel that we are too reliant on Harry and Charlie, so have added Gov inside 50 and included Martin as the 7th forward
No doubt this will change after trade/draft period, and again once some preseason games kick off
What he does with the ball is fine for a wing, but I don't think he has the fitness, the game read or the ability to find the ball you need to play the wing at AFL level.Could Boyd play wing ? Has the footskills!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
What he does with the ball is fine for a wing, but I don't think he has the fitness, the game read or the ability to find the ball you need to play the wing at AFL level.
That's kind of my problem, though. You have 4 marking options down there, but while they - especially Gov and Charlie, but Harry and Young as well - have good to exceptional speed and agility, it's for their height not in general.Down back, Saad, Williams, Boyd gives us run, Newman gives us that dissecting kick to break open zones
Forward line, all those players have good agility and or speed, but better balance of marking options, not solely pressure
That's kind of my problem, though. You have 4 marking options down there, but while they - especially Gov and Charlie, but Harry and Young as well - have good to exceptional speed and agility, it's for their height not in general.
On one hand, running that front 6 would see undersized backlines exposed if we can keep those talls organised, but on the other if we can't or our opposition can cover two to four talls that leaves exiting our front half much easier than if we had three small/mediums (in terms of playstyle instead of size) seeing to apply pressure at the balldrop. This problem is further exacerbated by the slow speed of our mids and the lack of pressure from the wings; if we had more prolific tacklers as wings or genuinely brilliant pockets up forward, I'd be more on board.
Think the improvement comes from improved consistency between Durdin and Motlop, and improved transition and defensive running from the forward flanks/wings to prevent us getting so exposed by turnover or from kickin.
Gov (2.1 tackles per match, 1.9 this season) is absolutely fast, and Martin (3.4 tackles per match, 2.6 this season and trending down over his career) can absolutel lay a tackle but to day none of the four of them average more than 2.6 tackles a game; Durdin averages 2.3 tackles per game, and Motlop 2.4, and while I'd expect them to improve you're asking both of them to improve by 4+ tackles a game to reach a reasonable, AFL average level.Durdin and Motlop are in that forward line. Martin is still quick, agile but can take a grab or crumb. Gov would probably be our quickest option of that front 7
Gov (2.1 tackles per match, 1.9 this season) is absolutely fast, and Martin (3.4 tackles per match, 2.6 this season and trending down over his career) can absolutel lay a tackle but to day none of the four of them average more than 2.6 tackles a game; Durdin averages 2.3 tackles per game, and Motlop 2.4, and while I'd expect them to improve you're asking both of them to improve by 4+ tackles a game to reach a reasonable, AFL average level.
Adding Young (1.4, 1.5 this year), Harry (1.5, 1.3 this year) and Charlie (2.0, 1.6 this year) to the picture and you've got a forward six that averages 15.1 tackles per match based on career averages. There are other ways of producing pressure sure, but just over 15 tackles a game is leaving an awful lot of work to midfield and defense.
It's a thought provoking idea certainly, but the trend in AFL is moving towards more forward pressure at present. I appreciate zigging when everyone else is zagging, but I'd prefer a forward line that is more likely to prevent the easy exit and getting scorched on turnover or kickin.
I like the idea of Young in the ruck. gives us a good marking option around the ground alsoVery early to nail this down without having a trade or draft period, but we can focus on the players we have on our list to start building a consensus
Boyd Wetering Williams
Marchbank Durdin Saad
TDK Hewett Doc
Cottrell Cripps Walsh
Gov Young C Curnow
Mots Harry Durdin
Int: Newman Kennedy Cerra Martin
Emg: Kemp Carroll Fisher Jsos
Still in the mix, Pitto LOB, Setters, Stocker, Owies, Cuners, Honey. The rest of the players would at this stage be injury depth
Made some changes to roles, as I prefer to play both Young and TDK in the ruck, so have included Durdin as a KPD. Need more agility so would leave Doc in the guts. I feel that we are too reliant on Harry and Charlie, so have added Gov inside 50 and included Martin as the 7th forward
No doubt this will change after trade/draft period, and again once some preseason games kick off
Would you say the inside 50 efficiency fell away after the bye? Or Ill ask it another way, do you know what we were ranked before the bye for inside 50 efficiency?Our numbers this year for tackles inside 50, rate 5th, better than the Pies, Cats, Dogs, Lions, Tigers. Demons, Swans, Dockers are within 1/2 a tackle above us
Not looking for more tackles as the priority, looking for a more dangerous unit inside forward 50, given we rank outside the top 8 for inside 50 efficiency