ferrisb
Brownlow Medallist
My order:
1. MEdwards
2. Simpson
3. Lual
4. ZZ
I'd reverse the order.
But only so I can have ZZ top...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
My order:
1. MEdwards
2. Simpson
3. Lual
4. ZZ
Personally i think he plays a bit like Adam Treloar, wins his own ball and is equally as damaging on the outsides…
Quick smart carries and creates and runs both ways…
Kicks goals too…
Hoping we get Schoenmakers tonight... Wieterbot is going to need an apprentice to incremently upload and back up his data to.
Mum Taekwondo Olympian, Dad Aus champ
Got a really bad corkie and missed a lot of footy.What’s the knock on him then to not be in the first round?
They’re first rounder qualities
If he can develop to play a similar role to Martin (albeit more offensive to Jack's defensive efforts) then it'd be a helluva 1-2 punch up forward. Has tricks to be great in other areas, but if we see him as the Heeney-type in our forward line... there's 100% a place for him and has a point of difference. No more forcing Matty K to play half forward, thank you very much.So the rumours about us being focussed on Moir are true.
The talent and skill level are obvious. Club obviously believe he has the fire and effort in him
Hope he develops an engine that can play further up the ground. If he can he have a genuine talent
Think so; he is a playmaker, has a rapport with Cowan and appears as much as I hate to say it to be a bit of a Dustin Fletcher-esque type. Also can pinch hit in ruck and as a Tasmanian we may lose him, but will get decent compensation if he comes on.Would Schoenmakers be of any interest if he didn't have a superboot?
I guess our future 1st is insurance. We have no idea how far the twins might rise in the rankings next year. We may need to trade that pick for more points, or we may be able to keep it and use it if they are expected to go lower.
I think Ashton has a lot of attributes which could lend themselves to midfield bursts.If he can develop to play a similar role to Martin (albeit more offensive to Jack's defensive efforts) then it'd be a helluva 1-2 punch up forward. Has tricks to be great in other areas, but if we see him as the Heeney-type in our forward line... there's 100% a place for him and has a point of difference. No more forcing Matty K to play half forward, thank you very much.
Reaching back to this post to avoid retreading the same ideas, I like the idea of balancing (now) Moir with George Stevens. Sure, we don't need a big bullocking mid right now but we will in no time at all plus Stevens has that massive leadership/character tick. I believe he was HB of the year in a rep team, too, so has a few positions.Cal‘s mock has a few falling compared to others.
I would not be adverse to taking Stevens. I know we’re looking at run and carry and Fwd craft, but I think it would be wise to invest in a Cripps succession plan also. That big powerful extracting mid type and this guy is ready to go. Simpson and Stevens would be an excellent haul IMHUO.
If we’re talking Edwards and going big, I’d rather a hybrid ruck/KPF like Archer Reid. 200+cm super mobile with excellent disposal for a big man.
Just going by his highlights package, I was slightly less impressed than some. I don't know what it is, something just screams out 'VFL champion' to me.Got a really bad corkie and missed a lot of footy.
Not sure about that. Is "only" 194 cm so not really a key position. Played mainly as a third defender/winger this year. Pinch hit in the ruck? Can't see it.Think so; he is a playmaker, has a rapport with Cowan and appears as much as I hate to say it to be a bit of a Dustin Fletcher-esque type. Also can pinch hit in ruck and as a Tasmanian we may lose him, but will get decent compensation if he comes on.
But he's not a KPP....he JSOS's height.Think so; he is a playmaker, has a rapport with Cowan and appears as much as I hate to say it to be a bit of a Dustin Fletcher-esque type. Also can pinch hit in ruck and as a Tasmanian we may lose him, but will get decent compensation if he comes on.
And slow.But he's not a KPP....he JSOS's height.
This guy is my 'hope'.
Simpson
Roberts
Schoenmaker
Reid
Murphy
Was talking about mental fortitudeJosh Honey had just as good pedigree he just had no idea how to find the ball
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
Yes including having the option to chase a "big fish"Very likely to get more for our future first by trading it next year vs trading it this year.
See, I reckon we have ample run.Love to know our thinking. We have Moir who is another mid sized forward. Do we go another?
If Edwards is available do we take a developing ruck or so we go some more run? Simpson?
Archer Ried is available? Lual is one I like
Key could be if we have a mature "role" player in mind as a rookie.
The question I would like to ask Austin is why did we only go with two picks? Given the eveness, and that we have the Campo kids next year should we have looked at another pick in the 20s by trading our F1? Did we put all our eggs in one basket trying to get a Top 10 pick?
We signed a few players on one year deals this year that are injury prone and/or are role players. Would another kid been better especially if we could have added a developing tall.
Pretty certain we weren’t taking Collard anyway.Rapt we got Moir but a tad shattered with Collards as we got SOS'd a pick before ours :/
Plenty of talent on the board wouldn't mind either of Roberts, Schoenmaker, Simpson, Edwards