- Apr 26, 2016
- 39,952
- 82,510
- AFL Club
- Sydney
- Moderator
- #1,601
And yet the AFL didn't consider it to be a form of "cheating."Every man and his dog could see that those players should have been assessed. There is zero downside to doing the assessment unless they fail. The doctor clearly choose to avoid the possibility of that consequence.
We're talking about players' lives here. $100k is a small price to pay for negligence in the name of winning a game of footy.
Why else would they have sent those players back out there? For shits and giggles? Of course not, it was because they wanted to win. Breaking the rules in order to win is exactly what cheating is. They got off way too lightly.