MRP / Trib. 2023 - MRO Chook Lotto - Carlton Tribunal News & Reports

[Aphrodite]

 

[Just Kreuzing]

****ing joke

 

[kreuze_missile]

3 weeks.

This tackling situation is ridiculous.

Touch footy era.

 

[carlton_99]

• 3 weeks for a tackle with no secondary motion or sling.
• 2 weeks for someone leaving the ground and elbowing someone in the head

Yep makes sense

 

[Just Kreuzing]

Better off doing what Rachele done for the crows…. next time instead of tackling just chin him….

 

[Arr0w]

Appeal coming I'd say

 

[cookie monster]

Appeal coming I'd say

Better be
Time to pull their pants down again

 

[cookie monster]

****ing ridiculous nonsense decision
Makes me so angry

 

[Mr_Plow]

Appeal coming I'd say

Club statement reads like no appeal which is staggering to me, this is an enormous loss for a key part of our defence.

 

[Blue Reaper]

Well, it’s confirmed. I have no effen idea anymore.

 

[Monty1978]

So if boyd bumped and he got knocked out would that still be 3 or more .. that doesn’t make sense to me.. a week I get 2 maybe but a bit harsh but 3 weeks .. so that action is the worse you can do because anyone got more then 3 this year

 

[carlton_99]

So if boyd bumped and he got knocked out would that still be 3 or more .. that doesn’t make sense to me.. a week I get 2 maybe but a bit harsh but 3 weeks .. so that action is the worse you can do because anyone got more then 3 this year

Broad got 4 but that was a horrendous tackle

 

[HereComesJuddy]

Didn't old mate slot a banana after the tackle? Surely that should be taken into account and brought down to 2 "the old banana rule" should be applied

 

[carltonchelsea]

Next level stupidity!!

 

[Sedated]

Appeal coming I'd say

If it was Cripps we'd 100% appeal.

 

[sbwan]

Club statement reads like no appeal which is staggering to me, this is an enormous loss for a key part of our defence.

There's no basis for an appeal. We agreed it was a dangerous tackle and just argued that the earlier (lighter) head clash may have caused the concussion. Could have got lucky but it was certainly open to the Tribunal to find that it was the Boyd tackle that caused it.

 

[HarryFlashman]

Well, it’s confirmed. I have no effen idea anymore.

You’re far from alone, mind boggling outcome

 

[Blue Reaper]

Finals pressure will be interesting - who’ll be the first player to be wiped out for the finals for a standard tackle that’s not reckless or dangerous but results in a head-knock/concussion.

 

[Blue Reaper]

The landscape and interpretation has certainly changed.

 

[bigblueboy]

There will be a refining of the approach to citing these tackling incidents from about round 23 onwards.
The AFL is trying to stamp out dangerous tackles not so much because they think the tackles need to removed from the game but because they are worried by not taking a strong stand that they are more susceptible to future legal claims.
The tribunal is creating a series of precedents which are further refined with every suspension.
Ultimately, as players and conches adapt and the hyperbole over the issue is succeeded by a newer rules ‘crisis’, the quantity and terms of suspensions for tackles will reduce.
Not coincidentally, this will occur just as the season comes to crunch time … as the AFL values its stars playing in the showcase finals (and the revenue that drives) more than it values player safety.
In the meantime, players are simply expendable pawns.

 

[manang magoos]

Finals pressure will be interesting - who’ll be the first player to be wiped out for the finals for a standard tackle that’s not reckless or dangerous but results in a head-knock/concussion.

Won’t be a Collingwood player you can take that to the bank

 

[BlueTongue]

3 weeks.

This tackling situation is ridiculous.

Touch footy era.

 

[manang magoos]

You’re far from alone, mind boggling outcome

Nor does the afl or mro knob Christian footy is becoming unwatchable see better games when I go watch young bloke play in local league

 

[Aphrodite]

Tribunal news: Boyd verdict

Jordan Boyd has learned his fate at the AFL Tribunal.

www.carltonfc.com.au

CARLTON defender Jordan Boyd had his rough conduct charge upheld by the AFL Tribunal tonight.

Boyd was charged for an incident that occurred in the Blues’ Round 18 win against Port Adelaide, which was graded as careless conduct, severe impact and high contact.

The Club contested the charge, and the charge was upheld at the AFL Tribunal on Tuesday night.

Boyd will serve a three-game suspension and will miss Rounds 19-21.

 

[carlton_99]

Tribunal news: Boyd verdict

Jordan Boyd has learned his fate at the AFL Tribunal.

www.carltonfc.com.au

Doesn't look like we will appeal which is disappointing. Been very impressed with Boyd and will miss him

 

[cookie monster]

Robbo on 360....
In the space of 5 minutes:
He celebrates the driving tackle of Maynard launching Walters head into the ground
And then after discussion on Boys asks "when will these players get this tackling out of their heads"