Could be available at our second pick
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Reminds me of the guy we picked up from Tassie, early 2000’s.Could be available at our second pick
We will take best available that is for certain, we can ill afford to gamble with our first pick. We need every position on the ground…mids, key position players then rucks I think in that order of priority. Any 200+ game player is better than picking for a position and getting nothing in return.Genuine question:
Does anyone give any credence to the analysis of us taking a genuine first ruck prospect in the ND?
As in:
A: there's several good prospects in this pool;
B: Steene is more a second ruck/fwd;
C: Begg is a tall back, at best.
(Sorry, if this's already been discussed at length).
Yeah, nah.Genuine question:
Does anyone give any credence to the analysis of us taking a genuine first ruck prospect in the ND?
As in:
A: there's several good prospects in this pool;
B: Steene is more a second ruck/fwd;
C: Begg is a tall back, at best.
(Sorry, if this's already been discussed at length).
Mediocre private school that has produced a small handful of AFL players over the years, including former Collingwood player Carl Steinfort.What on earth is Mazenod anyway?
2023 draft hand: 19, 33, 80, 98
Collingwood enters the draft with picks 19 and 33 and will likely use just those two selections.
Coming off a premiership, the Magpies don’t want for much, but using either their first or second-round draft pick on a tall wouldn’t be met with displeasure from their fans.
The last 195cm + tall Collingwood took in first two rounds of the draft that wasn’t a father-son was Brodie Grundy, prior to that it was when both Ben Reid and Nathan Brown were taken at picks eight and 10 in the 2006 Draft.
Simply put, the Magpies don’t like using draft picks on talls and instead seem to take them in rookie drafts or acquire them in trades.
You can’t knock their list-building plans as they seem to be perpetually playing in September and won a flag last season, but the Pies could do with some more top-line tall talent coming through.
Apart from that need, the Pies should go with the best available at their pick.
Verdict: Key position.
Assessing the 2023 draft needs for all 18 AFL clubs
Which type of player should your club target with the picks at their disposal?www.sen.com.au
Billy Morrison 2003 draft. Came with huge wraps on him. Turned out to be a bit of a dud. Apologies to Billy if you’re readingReminds me of the guy we picked up from Tassie, early 2000’s.
What would be more telling is his goal average per game. What on earth is Mazenod anyway?
Hine too good and too experienced to get lured in by that. He’ll no exactly what the kid is worth.
That's him, kicked 9 as a 15yo playing seniors but gee he was shitBilly Morrison 2003 draft. Came with huge wraps on him. Turned out to be a bit of a dud. Apologies to Billy if you’re reading
Billy Morrison 2003 draft. Came with huge wraps on him. Turned out to be a bit of a dud. Apologies to Billy if you’re reading
Will be an interesting watch to see how far our third pick comes in, & who's still available then before Dekka probably passes!With the rookie upgrades, that leaves us with 3 senior spots.
Surely they just take 3 picks in the draft then.
Then we had 2 rookies, whether thats rookie draft/ SSP, or MSD
Yeah probably, then use that last spot elsewhere.Will be an interesting watch to see how far our third pick comes in, & who's still available then before Dekka probably passes!
With the rookie upgrades, that leaves us with 3 senior spots.
Surely they just take 3 picks in the draft then.
Then we had 2 rookies, whether thats rookie draft/ SSP, or MSD
It's an option, of course, if there are still players available on their list - even if that's a youngish, mature-age player from a state league.I’d like to see us take the 3 picks at the ND. We need to keep building for the future and the ND is still the best method for that. Look at a couple of other more experienced types via DFA’s and Sup draft.
geezus man, why are you being so coy?I would if there's one there. I really like the look of Greens highlights.
Mitch Lewis was 76 and Larkey 73.Yeah probably, then use that last spot elsewhere.
I'll say one thing for Will Green: it's a rare, potential recruit that's already won several Copeland trophies.geezus man, why are you being so coy?
i watched Green's youtube highlights, on your recommendation, and didn't hit pause until i got to the end.
no question, this guy will be a star for 'the' Collingwood!
I'm so confused as to why he hasn't debuted as yet ..just play the kid ffs.
ps: for the avoidance of doubt, i like the kid.
Can’t help thinking that we might pick someone like Goad at our second… but more with the aim of developing him as a tall forward or back.Genuine question:
Does anyone give any credence to the analysis of us taking a genuine first ruck prospect in the ND?
As in:
A: there's several good prospects in this pool;
B: Steene is more a second ruck/fwd;
C: Begg is a tall back, at best.
(Sorry, if this's already been discussed at length).
Never heard of it, interesting context…suggests below mediocreMediocre private school that has produced a small handful of AFL players over the years, including former Collingwood player Carl Steinfort.
Matthew Boyd is by far the most prominent player in that group, and the less said around here about Alex Woodward the better.
But the AFL world's most prominent Mazenod student is Gerard Whateley.