List Mgmt. 2023 National Draft prospects

Remove this Banner Ad

COLLINGWOOD club banner


2023 draft hand: 19, 33, 80, 98

Collingwood enters the draft with picks 19 and 33 and will likely use just those two selections.

Coming off a premiership, the Magpies don’t want for much, but using either their first or second-round draft pick on a tall wouldn’t be met with displeasure from their fans.

The last 195cm + tall Collingwood took in first two rounds of the draft that wasn’t a father-son was Brodie Grundy, prior to that it was when both Ben Reid and Nathan Brown were taken at picks eight and 10 in the 2006 Draft.

Simply put, the Magpies don’t like using draft picks on talls and instead seem to take them in rookie drafts or acquire them in trades.

You can’t knock their list-building plans as they seem to be perpetually playing in September and won a flag last season, but the Pies could do with some more top-line tall talent coming through.

Apart from that need, the Pies should go with the best available at their pick.

Verdict: Key position.

 

Log in to remove this ad.

COLLINGWOOD club banner


2023 draft hand: 19, 33, 80, 98

Collingwood enters the draft with picks 19 and 33 and will likely use just those two selections.

Coming off a premiership, the Magpies don’t want for much, but using either their first or second-round draft pick on a tall wouldn’t be met with displeasure from their fans.

The last 195cm + tall Collingwood took in first two rounds of the draft that wasn’t a father-son was Brodie Grundy, prior to that it was when both Ben Reid and Nathan Brown were taken at picks eight and 10 in the 2006 Draft.

Simply put, the Magpies don’t like using draft picks on talls and instead seem to take them in rookie drafts or acquire them in trades.

You can’t knock their list-building plans as they seem to be perpetually playing in September and won a flag last season, but the Pies could do with some more top-line tall talent coming through.

Apart from that need, the Pies should go with the best available at their pick.

Verdict: Key position.

Haha. Sounds like they've been reading bf..

"using either their first or second-round draft pick on a tall wouldn’t be met with displeasure from their fans".
 
Haha. Sounds like they've been reading bf..

"using either their first or second-round draft pick on a tall wouldn’t be met with displeasure from their fans".

Would not rule that out 100%
 
So, Dekka being Dekka, I take it we go BPA in the ND, then target need & depth via the RD &/or UFA?

Have I missed any IRLMA's - important, relevant list management acronyms?

SSP, MSD


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Genuine question:

Does anyone give any credence to the analysis of us taking a genuine first ruck prospect in the ND?

As in:
A: there's several good prospects in this pool;
B: Steene is more a second ruck/fwd;
C: Begg is a tall back, at best.

(Sorry, if this's already been discussed at length).
 
Last edited:
Why you say that?

Probably because it’s the role he played this year. Whether that remains the same or they have him playing more ruck is a wait and see. The ruck was split between him and beggy with begg playing more ruck and Oscar more forward


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
 
COLLINGWOOD club banner


2023 draft hand: 19, 33, 80, 98

Collingwood enters the draft with picks 19 and 33 and will likely use just those two selections.

Coming off a premiership, the Magpies don’t want for much, but using either their first or second-round draft pick on a tall wouldn’t be met with displeasure from their fans.

The last 195cm + tall Collingwood took in first two rounds of the draft that wasn’t a father-son was Brodie Grundy, prior to that it was when both Ben Reid and Nathan Brown were taken at picks eight and 10 in the 2006 Draft.

Simply put, the Magpies don’t like using draft picks on talls and instead seem to take them in rookie drafts or acquire them in trades.

You can’t knock their list-building plans as they seem to be perpetually playing in September and won a flag last season, but the Pies could do with some more top-line tall talent coming through.

Apart from that need, the Pies should go with the best available at their pick.

Verdict: Key position.

SEN really don’t do their homework. The last 195cm+ player we took in the first 2 rounds of the draft was in 2020, Liam McMahon at pick 31.
 
Probably because it’s the role he played this year. Whether that remains the same or they have him playing more ruck is a wait and see. The ruck was split between him and beggy with begg playing more ruck and Oscar more forward


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

He did not play 1st Ruck as not Big/Strong Enough

Begg was our Number 1 Ruck in VFL but not many people think he is a Number 1 Ruckman at AFL Level
 
He did not play 1st Ruck as not Big/Strong Enough

Begg was our Number 1 Ruck in VFL but not many people think he is a Number 1 Ruckman at AFL Level

That’s right. So whether that changes once he gets some meat on those bones we shall see.


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
 
Genuine question:

Does anyone give any credence to the analysis of us taking a genuine first ruck prospect in the ND?

As in:
A: there's several good prospects in this pool;
B: Steene is more a second ruck/fwd;
C: Begg is a tall back, at best.

(Sorry, if this's already been discussed at length).

Short answer, no.
 
Genuine question:

Does anyone give any credence to the analysis of us taking a genuine first ruck prospect in the ND?

As in:
A: there's several good prospects in this pool;
B: Steene is more a second ruck/fwd;
C: Begg is a tall back, at best.

(Sorry, if this's already been discussed at length).
I would if there's one there. I really like the look of Greens highlights.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

List Mgmt. 2023 National Draft prospects

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top