- Oct 10, 2012
- 6,765
- 12,875
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
Wash your dirty mouth outI would say Lalor is the player i want most , The #4 would look so good on him at Richmond
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Sydney v Port Adelaide - 7:40 / 7:10 Fri
Squiggle tips Swans at 57% chance -- What's your tip? -- Teams on Thurs »
LIVE: Geelong v Brisbane Lions - 7:30PM Sat
Squiggle tips Cats at 54% chance -- What's your tip? -- Teams on Thurs »
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Prelim Finals
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
AFLW 2024 - Round 4 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Wash your dirty mouth outI would say Lalor is the player i want most , The #4 would look so good on him at Richmond
Absolutely no intent here - what would you like to do? Keep the pick - who would you like and what would be the fit? Thoughts on nabbing Allan- personally I’m a fan.Ralph posted not long after that saying he thinks that west coast may use pick 3 to gain more picks.
No intel at all
On SM-S921B using BigFooty.com mobile app
Exactly they are 'considering trading out 3 - Thank you for the confirmingOH PLEASE
STOP WITH THE CRAP
Gavin Bell has stated we are not trading pick 3 for Baker
Said we would consider moving back for two top 20 picks but only consider
lol, look who’s taking the thread off topic! I can definitely see WC trading 3 for two 1st round picks, baker would the the steak knives in that trade though, in an even draft, everyone wants more picks in the top 20.Exactly they are 'considering trading out 3 - Thank you for the confirming
Pyke , Bell and Matty Clarke looked desperated
Lets see but in the meanwhile lets not continue and put thread off topic
We're not entering the draft at pick 10 when all the good mids are gone if all we're getting back is Baker. Likewise, Baker is not worth pick 13.I could see a mutual back-scratch where you pay Graham enough to trigger Band 3 (pick 23 after Battle comp). We trade Baker, 10 (Bolton trade) and 29 (becomes 31) for 3 and maybe a later pick back our way (maybe not, probably doesn't matter much to either club).
Then you'd have 10, 13 (Barrass), 25, 31. If it needs more maybe we give you 23 instead of 31.
Baker has said he wants Richmond to be fairly compensated so the only other options are you give us pick 13 or your 25 and next year's second. It all depends on whether Matt Clarke sees value in getting an extra pick in that deep section of the draft. He might like four top-25 picks.
Where there's smoke there's fire is one of the most bullshit sayings I've ever heard.Where there is smoke !!
Didnt Pyke also mention something similar , That indicates that is being discussed at that level
You've clearly not read the article otherwise you'd see that's its all Richmond supporter Ralph speculation & they've just plastered an attention grabbing headline for clicks.Revealed: Eagles put pick three on table in Baker chase
Richmond could hold two of the top-three picks in this year’s draft, with West Coast putting its top selection on the table in the race for Liam Baker. JON RALPH wraps up the latest trade talk.
Personally I hope we keep it and get a midfielder to pair with Harley. We'll get the hawks 1st rounder most likely so we'll have another top 20 pickAbsolutely no intent here - what would you like to do? Keep the pick - who would you like and what would be the fit? Thoughts on nabbing Allan- personally I’m a fan.
Yep, fair enough. Sounds a plan. Can you just overlook Lalor? You’ve had 3 cups.
Are you aware that the West Coast list manager also flagged this as a possibility?Bloody Richmond supporters with Pick 3 for Baker. Reckon I'll give this board a spell to get away from this madness. Absolute peanuts.
Your taken the absolute piss mate. Richmond would have to add in the Rioli pick 6 as well to make the eagles consider it.I could see a mutual back-scratch where you pay Graham enough to trigger Band 3 (pick 23 after Battle comp). We trade Baker, 10 (Bolton trade) and 29 (becomes 31) for 3 and maybe a later pick back our way (maybe not, probably doesn't matter much to either club).
Then you'd have 10, 13 (Barrass), 25, 31. If it needs more maybe we give you 23 instead of 31.
Baker has said he wants Richmond to be fairly compensated so the only other options are you give us pick 13 or your 25 and next year's second. It all depends on whether Matt Clarke sees value in getting an extra pick in that deep section of the draft. He might like four top-25 picks.
Can’t add what they won’t have, GC will plonk 12 and 20 on the table for Rioli, they’ll want a pick ahead of the Lombard bid.Your taken the absolute piss mate. Richmond would have to add in the Rioli pick 6 as well to make the eagles consider it.
I think you're undercutting his value a bit there. We will need to add some sweeteners with that pick.Heard baker for WC pick 3 has been confirmed
Delusional richmond supporters.
Listen here your not getting three
Your not getting Lalor.
Nah we will keep pick 3 and take LalorHeard WC pick 3 for Baker locked in just figuring out steak knives going back Richmonds way
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
Why are you getting Nasty mate. You put up a one sided trade for Richmond and I called you out for it. Where hear to talk footy not getting personalRead the post again. "All you're getting" is not Baker.
When I want the opinion of a 14-year-old special ed student I'll ask you.
If we get 3 it'll be for Jagga. We'll already have Lalor.
The happy news for West Coast fans is they have Matt Clarke handling things, the genius behind drafting Callum Coleman-Jones, Riley Collier-Dawkins and Thomson Dow with first-rounders.
As an independent supporter - this is absolute mind worm level posting.I could see a mutual back-scratch where you pay Graham enough to trigger Band 3 (pick 23 after Battle comp). We trade Baker, 10 (Bolton trade) and 29 (becomes 31) for 3 and maybe a later pick back our way (maybe not, probably doesn't matter much to either club).
Then you'd have 10, 13 (Barrass), 25, 31. If it needs more maybe we give you 23 instead of 31.
Baker has said he wants Richmond to be fairly compensated so the only other options are you give us pick 13 or your 25 and next year's second. It all depends on whether Matt Clarke sees value in getting an extra pick in that deep section of the draft. He might like four top-25 picks.
That's assuming you trade pick 1 and Bakes for pick 3.Revealed: Eagles put pick three on table in Baker chase
Richmond could hold two of the top-three picks in this year’s draft, with West Coast putting its top selection on the table in the race for Liam Baker. JON RALPH wraps up the latest trade talk.
So nothing unusual then with Finn, pretty much summed up his draft year!Lol what a stinker of a quarter by fos.
Failed to evade a tacker
Failed to bounce the ball on the run
Gave a fifty meter penalty
I thought he had a reasonable game today and showed glimpses of his speed, overhead marking, evasiveness and neat disposal.So nothing unusual then with Finn, pretty much summed up his draft year!
Anything that could go wrong, did go wrong.