kickthething
Brownlow Medallist
I heard it may be a partner of one of the players……What are the odds that one of the boys that are leaving snitched on them.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I heard it may be a partner of one of the players……What are the odds that one of the boys that are leaving snitched on them.
In modern society, there are those who delight in taking offence.The AFL isn't responsible for solving world hunger or a ceasefire in Gaza.
The fact that it was a private function and someone felt strongly enough to blow the whistle is a clue.
Do you think that nothing is out of bounds at a company Christmas party?
It's a disgrace when you've got no idea whatsoever what the behaviour might have been?In modern society, there are those who delight in taking offence.
This sounds like a perennially offended type deciding to dob on people having a bit of politically incorrect but legal fun at a private party.
And if that’s the case - my view is that suspensions are unfair & quite frankly, a disgrace.
If more sinister details come to light, I’ll have a different view - but for now, it reeks of faux-outrage.
It was a “celebrity couples” dress up party & nothing illegal occurred, nor did it involve any members of the public.It's a disgrace when you've got no idea whatsoever what the behaviour might have been?
Given some of the popular stories in the media at the moment it doesn't require much imagination to see how badly this may have gone.
Probably not worth going heavy on the framing when we don't really know what it was.In modern society, there are those who delight in taking offence.
This sounds like a perennially offended type deciding to dob on people having a bit of politically incorrect but legal fun at a private party.
And if that’s the case - my view is that suspensions are unfair & quite frankly, a disgrace.
If more sinister details come to light, I’ll have a different view - but for now, it reeks of faux-outrage.
In other words, you want to hear that they "set fire to a midget and shot them out of a cannon".Unless someone set fire to a midget and shot them out of a cannon, I don't want to hear it.
So you'd be fine with, for example, racist chanting and a bit of casual blackface as long as it was a private function?The world has far bigger problems than drunken footy players presumably doing some politically incorrect (but not illegal) things at a private function.
But of course, the AFL will once again prove themselves to be our self-appointed moral guardians.
Thankyou AFL, for without you, I would clearly not be on the path of true virtue and enlightenment.
Fair enough.It was a “celebrity couples” dress up party & nothing illegal occurred, nor did it involve any members of the public.
That much has been reported.
But anyway, I’ll pipe down on this now - as we may (or may not) get more detail down the track. And I hate it when get myself all riled up over these things.
The good news - it’s going to hurt GWS. I can only imagine how p*ssed off the playing group will be with the club, if they dole out suspensions viewed as corporate moral posturing.
I mean if they're joking about and re-enacting sexual assault (what Diddy is alleged to have done), at a public venue (hotel) even if it's a separate room, and at a work related function (given staff and possibly partners were there at various points) then it's not nothing.Surely there’s more to the story than this? View attachment 2143638
I understand the trouble with Diddy but Raygun should be okay though?I mean if they're joking about and re-enacting sexual assault (what Diddy is alleged to have done), at a public venue (hotel) even if it's a separate room, and at a work related function (given staff and possibly partners were there at various points) then it's not nothing.
Can't see dressups being a problem, but depends what, if anything was said or enacted about her.I understand the trouble with Diddy but Raygun should be okay though?
It’s also an internal workplace matter for the club given those circumstances. I don’t think the AFL have a role.I mean if they're joking about and re-enacting sexual assault (what Diddy is alleged to have done), at a public venue (hotel) even if it's a separate room, and at a work related function (given staff and possibly partners were there at various points) then it's not nothing.
And given they looked into it and ticked it off should be the end of it.It’s also an internal workplace matter for the club given those circumstances. I don’t think the AFL have a role.
This is where I'm seeing it as an overreaction from the AFL- pending further information.It’s also an internal workplace matter for the club given those circumstances. I don’t think the AFL have a role.
The AFL don't have a role in the workplace conditions and public behaviour (which it was) of one of their teams, that they own and fund?It’s also an internal workplace matter for the club given those circumstances. I don’t think the AFL have a role.
Yeah, Toby Greene stiff, but Isaac Cumming not?Geez Toby Greene stiff. If I was those 6, I'd be splitting that fine between them.
I will be honest, I only read up to the Toby Greene part haha. Anyone fined whilst not participating is stiff.Yeah, Toby Greene stiff, but Isaac Cumming not?
It's a slippery slope isn't it. And I say this without knowing the full facts.The AFL don't have a role in the workplace conditions and public behaviour (which it was) of one of their teams, that they own and fund?
Ok...