tigs2010
Pick 1...
Probably no more than 11 & 23 if pick 2 trade failed.
List Mgmt. 2024 Draft - Post Trade Period Edition
- Thread starter _RT_
- Start date
- Tagged users None
- Status
- Oct 11, 2003
- 9,984
- 12,351
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- tigers
getting personal mate doesnt work, go have a long walk and have a look at yourself
Nothing.
Groupie_
time to return the traditional Richmond yellow
a can of luncheon meat
Who would have to be at that pick for you to do it?
Groupie_
time to return the traditional Richmond yellow
maybe 4 is the way to go so we can repay carltoon for ben lemon over cripps
tigs2010
Pick 1...
Jagga. Would do it for Draper too but why would the Crows.
I think there is a top 4 (5 or 6 if you like Langford or Smillie) with a better higher upside top 2 within that. But yeah I'm only doing it for a 20's pick at a stretch.
Jagga
I'm starting to become more fascinated by a Lalor/Jagga or Lalor/Smilie/Langford combination.....
I'd offer 11 & 23 for 4 and maybe some back.
- Feb 14, 2014
- 6,267
- 15,009
- AFL Club
- Richmond
Not personal at all. I was merely pointing out that a certain type of behaviour would make one look foolish. If you interpret that as a personal attack then you accept that you engaged in said behaviour.
Here is me getting personal for comparison. I would surprised if you made it this far into my post since it is more than two sentences long, though if you have made it this far make sure you thank your carer for me. Having to explain simple concepts and moderate your foolishness is a duty beyond the scope of her regular duties for you.
See the difference?
Getting Jagga in means there'll be so much more patience with Lalor from fans and the media.
I back us in not to rush a guy like Lalor anyway, but with an uber consistent player like Jagga racking them up probably pretty early on delays the pressure for output on a guy who hasn't had a footy preseason in his life.
Shouldn't be piling on 18-20 year olds to perform anyway, but it's how it goes in the media, they'll be keen to create the narrative. 'Richmond: 7 first-round misses'. Also we've got some impatient pessimistic fans that are coming out of the woodwork again.
Also Jagga is a gun, could easily be the best player of the draft/top 10. Won't be the worst that's for sure. Perfect for our midfield balance.
Side side note: rucks take years to develop so why waste first rounders on them but we're in an interesting position with as many firsts as we have, I don't mind the idea of Dodson, developing him, he's an incredible athlete and 204cm. Imagine a decade of our midfield group building chemistry. Like how Clarry knew where Gawn was putting it before Gawn even knew. If he was Metro I'd be all for it. Could be 4 years of developing him and then watching him go do that for Adelaide.
I back us in not to rush a guy like Lalor anyway, but with an uber consistent player like Jagga racking them up probably pretty early on delays the pressure for output on a guy who hasn't had a footy preseason in his life.
Shouldn't be piling on 18-20 year olds to perform anyway, but it's how it goes in the media, they'll be keen to create the narrative. 'Richmond: 7 first-round misses'. Also we've got some impatient pessimistic fans that are coming out of the woodwork again.
Also Jagga is a gun, could easily be the best player of the draft/top 10. Won't be the worst that's for sure. Perfect for our midfield balance.
Side side note: rucks take years to develop so why waste first rounders on them but we're in an interesting position with as many firsts as we have, I don't mind the idea of Dodson, developing him, he's an incredible athlete and 204cm. Imagine a decade of our midfield group building chemistry. Like how Clarry knew where Gawn was putting it before Gawn even knew. If he was Metro I'd be all for it. Could be 4 years of developing him and then watching him go do that for Adelaide.
So going up to 4 with 11 or trading back with gws for 16 + 21 or dogs 17 + 25?
Or go both ways with one of 10/11 forward to 4 and the other back? Or just stay?
I’m almost inclined to do both if we want Jagga/Draper enough, though I do love that group around 10.
tigs2010
Pick 1...
Groupie_
time to return the traditional Richmond yellow
Richmond should never choose a player based on fans impatience.
I was thinking that a tall forward was right at the top of our list and could go early and take the best available.
None of them scream take me from what I have seen. We have Fawcett, Lefau, Bauer and Gray or our list, all basically unknown how good they will be. Lefau was impressive and looks like he could play CHF due to his athleticism, Bauer was very impressive in his little cameo at the end. Fawcett and Gray will get games you would think this year.
I would also like to see what players who read the ball in the air like Young and even Blight could do up forward. Gibcus could end up there.
So do we wait a year and go early on the best young forward next year after we have had a look at what we've got. Not much point in having a good handful of forwards running around the VFL and then adding another one.
None of them scream take me from what I have seen. We have Fawcett, Lefau, Bauer and Gray or our list, all basically unknown how good they will be. Lefau was impressive and looks like he could play CHF due to his athleticism, Bauer was very impressive in his little cameo at the end. Fawcett and Gray will get games you would think this year.
I would also like to see what players who read the ball in the air like Young and even Blight could do up forward. Gibcus could end up there.
So do we wait a year and go early on the best young forward next year after we have had a look at what we've got. Not much point in having a good handful of forwards running around the VFL and then adding another one.
tigs2010
Pick 1...
Better go FOS & Draper then
The focus is on development, if you've got a group all significantly miles off in their development there's less probability of any of them coming through. We're rebuilding, there's things like this you unfortunately consider. It's a balancing act. GWS back when they entered the comp would've been considering raw prospects alongside guys with a higher floor.
I'm saying the pressure only gets heavier and heavier if you've got a group of 7 raw prospects yielding no results. Obviously don't have access to the psych reports, but they're a bunch of kids, thats what Richmond should consider a long with a lot of things, when drafting a player.
tigs2010
Pick 1...
Think we will just trade for our #1 KPF in this build. Let another club take the punt with their early picks. We probably still take one though given we have 8 picks.
Groupie_
time to return the traditional Richmond yellow
thats not what dan richarson said
Devon?
Groupie_
time to return the traditional Richmond yellow
plumrose
Hello Ben Cousins....
Groupie_
time to return the traditional Richmond yellow
we should get shifter sheehan on our recruiting team
bloke knows which kids are stars (all of them)
bloke knows which kids are stars (all of them)
- Status
Similar threads
