List Mgmt. 2024 Draft & Trade Hypotheticals

What should we get with our first two picks as they stand

  • Best Available for both

    Votes: 25 29.4%
  • Small forward/Small Defender

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • KPD/Small Forward

    Votes: 9 10.6%
  • Mid/KPD

    Votes: 2 2.4%
  • KPD/Defender

    Votes: 19 22.4%
  • KPF/Small Forward

    Votes: 7 8.2%
  • KPF/Mid

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • KPF/Defender

    Votes: 23 27.1%

  • Total voters
    85

Remove this Banner Ad

I would not be able to pick David Cuningham out of a line-up.

If he can be a pressure forward then I'm all for it. Anything else seems pointless.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

I would not be able to pick David Cuningham out of a line-up.

If he can be a pressure forward then I'm all for it. Anything else seems pointless.
I don't think he ever played as a forward for a long period of time.

My knowledge of him is he is a good kick and fast. Body regularly fell apart
 
If you read his player thread on the Blues board it looks like a long shot but worth investigating

Very highly rated wing/ half forward fast silky with great skills, able to hit the ball at extreme pace (Judd like!)

He should probably go to Brisbane though, their medicos seem to be able to work miracles
 
I would not be able to pick David Cuningham out of a line-up.

If he can be a pressure forward then I'm all for it. Anything else seems pointless.

Plays mid fwd basically
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Maybe not, but it still feels like an odd thing to be going onto another team's board to discuss.

Cochran is likely a 50+ pick or rookie draft selection. Dunno why another team's supporter would care.
And his troll post yesterday was about when they get Chad
 
If you read his player thread on the Blues board it looks like a long shot but worth investigating

Very highly rated wing/ half forward fast silky with great skills, able to hit the ball at extreme pace (Judd like!)

He should probably go to Brisbane though, their medicos seem to be able to work miracles

History will record this as the only point in time at which David Cunningham was compared to Chris Judd.

A truly momentous occasion.
 
History will record this as the only point in time at which David Cunningham was compared to Chris Judd.

A truly momentous occasion.

LOL I’m only repeating what the Blues fans said

In fairness, if you watch his highlights he does move similar to Judd with that breakaway pace from the contest
 
Cuningham (yes with 1 n) is one of the great “what ifs” we’ve had over the last 8 years.

Supremely talented, skilful and quick.

Could never find consistency, body let him down countless times and when he was fit he was a guy who’d light up 5 minutes and then be anonymous for the rest of the quarter.

On talent he’s worth a spot, but I wouldn’t hold out hope he can stay on the park
 
Posters get too focused on a recruits position. Players roles change to fit the teams needs
The team's needs, IMO, are more players suited to the contest, players who offer defensive pressure, and tall forwards. I think any recruit who doesn't tick any of these boxes is not filling a need and actually risks becoming surplus to needs. So I don't think we can just discard the positions they've played. It informs who they are as players and what they can and can't do for us.
 
The team's needs, IMO, are more players suited to the contest, players who offer defensive pressure, and tall forwards. I think any recruit who doesn't tick any of these boxes is not filling a need and actually risks becoming surplus to needs. So I don't think we can just discard the positions they've played. It informs who they are as players and what they can and can't do for us.
I agree. We have a very soft underbelly and often wilt under pressure, whether that's from teams like Tigers to the very best like Brisbane.
 
If you read his player thread on the Blues board it looks like a long shot but worth investigating

Very highly rated wing/ half forward fast silky with great skills, able to hit the ball at extreme pace (Judd like!)

He should probably go to Brisbane though, their medicos seem to be able to work miracles
If he is not part of a team that has lost two Grand Finals in 24 months by 60 & 80 points then we'll take him.
At least he isn't head f k d.
That's a good starting point.
 
He's a shorter version of Fox
So a shorter version of someone who despite actually turning up in grand finals, would be out of most people's Best 22s (because we want to be successful apparently).

And to be clear, I think Fox is Best 22 if we're serious about winning a flag.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

List Mgmt. 2024 Draft & Trade Hypotheticals

Back
Top