Milo Cyrus
Premiership Player
- Feb 22, 2021
- 4,102
- 6,312
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Opinion 2024 Fantasy - Player X vs Y vs Z
- Thread starter WaynesWorld19
- Start date
- Tagged users None
Naicos/ZReid
V
Newcombe/Coffield
Naicos mid
V
Newcombe/Coffield
Naicos mid
- Sep 8, 2013
- 5,661
- 9,367
- AFL Club
- Richmond
1 imo. Daicos puts 10 on Newcombe. Reid 55, Coffield 60
- Sep 8, 2013
- 5,661
- 9,367
- AFL Club
- Richmond
Stewart, Budarick, Steele
V
NWM, Coffield, Bont?
V
NWM, Coffield, Bont?
Yellow Feathers
Norm Smith Medallist
Bont & Gawn vs Marshall & Butters
Marshall doesn't have a bye at least.
Marshall doesn't have a bye at least.
Bont/Gawn for me
Last minute tempting changes lol
Budarick
M Roberts (onfield) All 3 have byes
Heeney
or
Coffield
Wines
Fyfe
I really don't like all 3 having byes but the upside on the top is definitely better.
Budarick
M Roberts (onfield) All 3 have byes
Heeney
or
Coffield
Wines
Fyfe
I really don't like all 3 having byes but the upside on the top is definitely better.
- Mar 31, 2019
- 1,159
- 1,272
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
Genuinely curious. Im sold on nwm but wondering why others aren't
Second year last year. Averaged 92, 10 tons, some ceiling scores. Same amount of tons as Whitfield
Now is main distributor, kick ins, going into his third year where data shows most players properly break out. Also no Sinclair yet
But people don't bat an eye at him with no early bye
Whitfield has the early bye, hasn't gone 95 since 2019. Hh, ash, cumming effect him (cumming is missing a bit)
Second year last year. Averaged 92, 10 tons, some ceiling scores. Same amount of tons as Whitfield
Now is main distributor, kick ins, going into his third year where data shows most players properly break out. Also no Sinclair yet
But people don't bat an eye at him with no early bye
Whitfield has the early bye, hasn't gone 95 since 2019. Hh, ash, cumming effect him (cumming is missing a bit)
1 for me. Stewart great first up fixture, Budarick feels safer than Coffield + higher ceiling and I think Steele goes with 5-10 of Bont this year.
100, 80, 105 (285)
vs
95, 60, 110 (265)
1 for me but yes agree, depending on your structure with the early byes the 2nd option could be safer. More upside with the top.
80, 70, 95 (245)
vs
60, 95, 70 (225)
- Mar 20, 2013
- 5,189
- 5,324
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
I like option 1 but maybe that’s because I have them all and only wines from the other
Roberts bye near irrelevant as a rookie
Budarick- on 1 hand he’s cheap enough it doesn’t matter so much, it’s just the bye being early offsets any benefit of the 1 week ahead cash gen
Heeney that bye not ideal as there seems to be the highest number of good options but there’s time to trade some out
Have 1 person on Budaricks bye, and 2 already on Heeney and Roberts bye.
I feel like ill make up the points from the players with no byes, just not sure if its more or not.
JDWCE
Norm Smith Medallist
I’ve had him most of preseason but the closer I get to bounce down, the more often I find myself dropping him just for the fact there’s so many value guys around that price mark. All of Whitfield, Young, J Clark, Yeo and him are vying for essentially 1-2 spotsGenuinely curious. Im sold on nwm but wondering why others aren't
Second year last year. Averaged 92, 10 tons, some ceiling scores. Same amount of tons as Whitfield
Now is main distributor, kick ins, going into his third year where data shows most players properly break out. Also no Sinclair yet
But people don't bat an eye at him with no early bye
Whitfield has the early bye, hasn't gone 95 since 2019. Hh, ash, cumming effect him (cumming is missing a bit)
Catastrophe!
Cancelled
- Jan 5, 2024
- 554
- 1,227
Genuinely curious. Im sold on nwm but wondering why others aren't
Second year last year. Averaged 92, 10 tons, some ceiling scores. Same amount of tons as Whitfield
Now is main distributor, kick ins, going into his third year where data shows most players properly break out. Also no Sinclair yet
But people don't bat an eye at him with no early bye
Whitfield has the early bye, hasn't gone 95 since 2019. Hh, ash, cumming effect him (cumming is missing a bit)
Had him at the start of PS locked into most of my teams, with the news of Sinclair predominantly playing mid (had Sinclair locked too).
As news filtered through that Sinclair had stayed back and then he got injured, slowly both found their way out due to the uncertainty of points distribution - given just how prominent Sinclair is in the back half.
Then you add in Hill, Windhager, Stocker, I just don't see where the improvement comes from - especially when you've got guys like Young, Short, Whit, Sheezel, all in a similar price bracket.
Hope that provides a bit of reasoning, haha
- Aug 15, 2009
- 4,691
- 7,468
- AFL Club
- West Coast
He's in my side. Has scoring upside, no early bye and I don't expect I will have to move him out all season either. Ecstatic he is only 10% ownership.Genuinely curious. Im sold on nwm but wondering why others aren't
Second year last year. Averaged 92, 10 tons, some ceiling scores. Same amount of tons as Whitfield
Now is main distributor, kick ins, going into his third year where data shows most players properly break out. Also no Sinclair yet
But people don't bat an eye at him with no early bye
Whitfield has the early bye, hasn't gone 95 since 2019. Hh, ash, cumming effect him (cumming is missing a bit)
Bont and Coffield
or
Butters and Budarick
or
Butters and Budarick
I prefer the first, but mostly because I'm unsure on Butters and his injury risk. If the game is done, and he's carrying something, he might be rested in final quarter.
- Mar 20, 2007
- 30,008
- 28,265
- AFL Club
- West Coast
Sheezel + Z.Williams + L.Jackson
or
Whitfield + Budarick + Heeney
Option 1 means bye players of 1/2/4/3
Option 2 means bye players of 0/4/5/3
or
Whitfield + Budarick + Heeney
Option 1 means bye players of 1/2/4/3
Option 2 means bye players of 0/4/5/3
Yeah top if safer, possible few points lost but having the Captain option is nice.
Can’t decide if downgrading 3 players to upgrade to one Uber premo and reducing my bye players is worth it?
1: Z Williams, Gawn, Jackson, Lazzaro
2: Coffield, English, Rankine, Cadman (Wilson move onfield).
Points wise I think it will be quite similar but option 2 perhaps a greater risk.
Benefit is getting English but is it worth the expense?
1: Z Williams, Gawn, Jackson, Lazzaro
2: Coffield, English, Rankine, Cadman (Wilson move onfield).
Points wise I think it will be quite similar but option 2 perhaps a greater risk.
Benefit is getting English but is it worth the expense?
tigs2010
Pick 1...
Who are your C options in 1?
Have Daicos and Bont to go with both options.
Just really like the look of one of the two premo rucks but can’t decide if it’s worth the investment.
Also looking at option C: Coffield, Marshall, Rankine and then Cadman for Dempsey instead.
L Jackson and Robert’s on field
Or
Crouch and Windsor on field
Or
Crouch and Windsor on field
Personally I don’t have Windsor in my team at all and don’t think he’s a good pick even for a rookie let alone on field.
He looks the type that will hit a lot of 40s.
45 last week. 46 the week before praccy game which included 2 goals.
For that reason alone, I’d go option 1.
