List Mgmt. 2024 GWS Giants List Management - Academy, Free Agent, Trade & Draft

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

Losing tough seasoned players in their mid twenties like Perryman and Cumming sets the club right back and is very disappointing for the club and supporters. Draft picks won't help the team next year.

We lost Bruhn, Hill, Hop and Taranto and played multiple finals in both seasons since.
 
Assuming the Pies are offering more than what Power was offering, Perryman's contract is surely worth more than 850k/yr by now right? Off vibes that should net us band one, but who knows what's going on with the secret herbs and spices of FA compensation.
 
So best and fairest tomorrow night so suspect we will either get an announcement that Peatling is staying on the night. Or in a few days Peating will request a trade.
Half the night will be farewell speeches 😂
 
Half the night will be farewell speeches 😂

I Love Lucy Sigh GIF by Paramount+
 
Assuming the Pies are offering more than what Power was offering, Perryman's contract is surely worth more than 850k/yr by now right? Off vibes that should net us band one, but who knows what's going on with the secret herbs and spices of FA compensation.
Estimate of $900k required for band 1, and he might be just short ...
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Assuming the Pies are offering more than what Power was offering, Perryman's contract is surely worth more than 850k/yr by now right? Off vibes that should net us band one, but who knows what's going on with the secret herbs and spices of FA compensation.

There wont be a huge difference between band 1 and 2. Depending on what Bris do with their pick, it gets eaten by Ashcroft at present. Could be 4 picks.
 
It makes you wonder how much we're gonna need to pay Callaghan and Green.

850-900k for Perryman?
Perryman is in a similar situation to McKay last year where he is pretty much the best / one of the only good free agents on the market so there's a bit of a bidding war. Plus, free agents attract a lot more money as well as they don't cost any draft picks
 
Perryman is in a similar situation to McKay last year where he is pretty much the best / one of the only good free agents on the market so there's a bit of a bidding war. Plus, free agents attract a lot more money as well as they don't cost any draft picks
Exactly.

And the two clubs who fought the bidding war - Pies & Port - are clubs who don't have much in the way of first round picks this year.
 
There wont be a huge difference between band 1 and 2. Depending on what Bris do with their pick, it gets eaten by Ashcroft at present. Could be 4 picks.
Brisbane will sell their pick to get extra points, so it will still be there, for another club.

There is potentially an opportunity for us - with respect to one of the picks from Gold Coast (pick #12), West Coast (pick #13, from Hawthorn in the Barrass trade) & Brisbane (pick #18) - to move earlier in the draft if we want to focus on a better quality player.

For example, if we were to get band 1 for Pez, band 2 for Cumming, and a second round pick for Peatling, we could potentially work something like #14, #15, #21, #30 & #37 (our original 2nd round pick pushed back by FA compo picks) into #12, #14 and some later picks ... allowing those northern clubs to sell their new picks for even more points.
 
The rise of James Peatling: From VFL player and super sub to in-demand AFL trade target

Lachlan McKirdy

01 October 2024

News Sport Network

He’s the kid from north-western Sydney who has quickly become the most in-demand player this AFL trade period.

It’s been a rapid rise to fame for James Peatling, the Giants’ Academy product who became an integral part of their best 23 by the end of 2024.

However, off-contract after this season, the 24-year-old reportedly has seven clubs in the competition chasing after his services.

While GWS are still considered the frontrunners, Adelaide, Collingwood, Melbourne, St Kilda, West Coast and the Western Bulldogs all have interest in the talented midfielder.

So, what attributes has Peatling shown this year to grab the attention of so many clubs? And why is it so important for the Giants that they hang onto another one of their homegrown talents?

MIDFIELDER BY TRADE

Peatling made 19 appearances for the Giants in 2024, with seven of those as the sub. He built a reputation early in the season for his ability to quickly have an impact, however, it’s important to note his development throughout the season.


Position BreakdownRounds 2-15Round 17 Onwards
Centre Bounce Attendance rate34%49%
Defence1%3%
Wing31%3%
Midfield63%70%
Forward5%24%
Centre Bounce Attendances Round 17 OnwardsTotals
Tom Green240
Toby Bedford208
James Peatling144
Finn Callaghan112
Stephen Coniglio95
Josh Kelly35
Toby Greene26
Brent Daniels25


A strong performance against the Swans in round 8 wasn’t enough to keep his place and he spent the next two months bouncing in and out of the team. However, when he appeared in the VFL he looked far too good for that level, averaging 30 disposals, five tackles and two goals a game.

He returned to play every match for Adam Kingsley’s team from round 17 onwards, while earning his place in the starting side by round 19 against the Suns. What he brought to the table was unquestionable effort and immense pressure around the ball. He also finally displayed the consistency that Kingsley had been hoping to see from him.

Peatling registered a career-high 28 disposals in the win against Melbourne, on top of 11 tackles and eight clearances. His work rate was regularly praised by Kingsley as the Giants put together a strong run to end the year.

Importantly, he has been rewarded for finally taking his midfield opportunities with both hands. Before round 15 he only attended approximately a third of the Giants’ centre bounces. From round 17 onwards, he was at nearly half of them and had the third-highest attendance rate of any Giant.

His late-season averages also match that of a quality midfielder growing in confidence thanks to the experience he was gaining.

How Peatling grew into Giant midfield

CLUTCH MOMENTS

There’s nothing like a few headline-grabbing moments to put your value through the roof in a contract year. And Peatling did exactly that this season.

Firstly, it started in the Giants’ dramatic one-point win over St Kilda in Canberra.

After coming on as the sub, he produced a sensational mark in the final minute of the game, saving the result for GWS and handing them an important home victory.

Then during his best-on-ground showing against the Dees, Peatling made a crucial tackle inside the final minute to stop one last Melbourne attack.

It’s a quality that Kingsley’s side were crying out for this year, especially in the two finals where they were unable to hold onto a lead. It’s a good sign for Peatling that he’s shown he can stand up in the biggest moments so early in his career.

LOCKDOWN ABILITY

If not for Joe Daniher’s late heroics, Peatling likely would have been the star of the show during the Giants’ semi-final against the Lions.

Their disappointing defeat after being 44 points up has been well scrutinised, but Peatling was one of the main reasons they were in that position to start with.

Sent to play a defensive role on All-Australian Dayne Zorko, Peatling kicked two goals with his first two touches of the game. The pressure he applied to Zorko also saw the former Brisbane captain at fault for multiple Giants goals.

A study of that game, particularly the first three-quarters, highlights Peatling’s versatility not just as an on-ball midfielder, but in playing a role for Kingsley.

WANTS TO STAY

Ahead of the finals, Peatling made it very clear to this masthead that his priority was to stay at the Giants. “Coming through the junior ranks, and being from Sydney as well, I’d love to stay here,” he said.

He also spoke extensively about the belief he gained from earning a spot in the midfield.

If you had assessed his prospects in June, you would have understood his desire to move to another club for opportunities. However, by the end of the season, he was entrenched in the best 23 and regularly appeared at centre bounces.

Peatling from Rd17 onwards (per 100 mins)

StatisticRound 17 Onwards
Disposals17.0
Contested Possessions9.4
Clearances4.9
Tackles8.2


“I feel like when I play my best football, I can be in this midfield,” he said.

The key to his decision is two-fold. Firstly, what does his role look like in 2025? If it’s anything like the end of this season, Kingsley should be able to assure him of a position in the midfield which should be a tick.

But then there is the length of the contract and compensation. Initial reports suggested the Giants had tabled a three-year deal, but with Isaac Cumming and Harry Perryman both confirmed to be on their way out, there is probably scope to up that offer.

While the Giants have a few other players they’re renegotiating with, Peatling has to be priority number one. Not only because of the level of interest across the competition which indicates his talent, but for the fact he is a local kid that represents what the club wants to become.

If Peatling can become a star of this Giants midfield going forward, it has the potential to spark the dreams of other kids in Western Sydney to play Aussie rules at the highest level. It’s a win-win for a club that needs every victory in the region it can get.
 
Ah well, I was expecting that, but I must admit with the other outgoing players, I wondered if he might get a reprieve.

It doesn't say whether he's retired or been delisted; presumably the latter if they haven't stated the former.
 

GIANTS SWEAT ON COMPO CALL​

COLLINGWOOD's move for Harry Perryman will come close to being the biggest free agency deal made this off-season, triggering hopes at Greater Western Sydney that it could earn the club Band 1 compensation.

There had been a feeling among the clubs involved in the Perryman chase that Collingwood's offer was either on par or even larger than Hawthorn's move for St Kilda free agent Josh Battle. As revealed by AFL.com.au on Tuesday morning, Perryman chose to take up the Magpies offer despite significant interest from Port Adelaide and the option of staying at the Giants on a long-term deal. Collingwood's offer for Perryman extends six years, ensuring the defender's future at his boyhood club until at least 2030, with a thought it could need to exceed $900,000 per year to earn the Giants first-round compensation.

What aids the Giants' cause is that Perryman is a young free agent, given his December 19 birthday, and he won't turn 26 until later this year. A similar situation occurred last year with Ben McKay, who was also 25 when he left North Melbourne for Essendon as a free agent, netted the Kangas Band 1 compensation. The difference between Band 1 and Band 2 compensation for the Giants currently stands at pick No.15 or No.19, pending an AFL outcome likely to arrive over the weekend, but could have significant ramifications throughout the Trade Period.
 

GIANTS SWEAT ON COMPO CALL​

COLLINGWOOD's move for Harry Perryman will come close to being the biggest free agency deal made this off-season, triggering hopes at Greater Western Sydney that it could earn the club Band 1 compensation.

There had been a feeling among the clubs involved in the Perryman chase that Collingwood's offer was either on par or even larger than Hawthorn's move for St Kilda free agent Josh Battle. As revealed by AFL.com.au on Tuesday morning, Perryman chose to take up the Magpies offer despite significant interest from Port Adelaide and the option of staying at the Giants on a long-term deal. Collingwood's offer for Perryman extends six years, ensuring the defender's future at his boyhood club until at least 2030, with a thought it could need to exceed $900,000 per year to earn the Giants first-round compensation.

What aids the Giants' cause is that Perryman is a young free agent, given his December 19 birthday, and he won't turn 26 until later this year. A similar situation occurred last year with Ben McKay, who was also 25 when he left North Melbourne for Essendon as a free agent, netted the Kangas Band 1 compensation. The difference between Band 1 and Band 2 compensation for the Giants currently stands at pick No.15 or No.19, pending an AFL outcome likely to arrive over the weekend, but could have significant ramifications throughout the Trade Period.
Great result for the Giants if they can land pick #15. Which will turn into eventually pick #19 probably after father sons and academy selections. To have 2 picks in a row in a strong draft will be very nice indeed. Yes, it is tough losing Pez but I honestly think he is replaceable with Cumming.. ah wait, no, XO... ah wait, no, Peatling... ah shit, no... haha
But in all seriousness it hurts mostly because of his age bracket is in a sweet spot and we don't have many players in the 22-27yo on our list.
We do have young, talented yet untried players on our list who will fill the void. Just need to hope our experience holds up and stays fit next year.
 
I think we could have done better trading directly with Eagles.
Other clubs will try to take advantage of us.
We should also up our offer to peatling, unless we actually don't rate him as much as other clubs do.
Hopefully if he leaves it is to someone with a decent 1st rounder.
Something like peatling, 2025r2 for 11,2025r4 appeals to me. I don't want pick 32 for him if clubs are offering 5yrs, 700k a year to him.
I think that may very well be the case that we rate him as a good player but we know if we off him too much now, it'll cost us some one else later.
Half the night will be farewell speeches 😂
My first one, looking forward to it
 

Remove this Banner Ad

List Mgmt. 2024 GWS Giants List Management - Academy, Free Agent, Trade & Draft

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top