- Thread starter
- Moderator
- #3
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 6 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Kane Cornes has matured, while Brian Taylor has regressed to an irrelevant imbecile.
ah yeah today is tuesday..Tonight
Robbo on afl360 "Mansell did nothing wrong, he just looked up and saw a freight train coming towards him, Boyd has to go".
No commentary required.
Robbo would say if it was Maynard that it was ok because he plays the game hard and praise his attack on the ballRobbo on afl360 "Mansell did nothing wrong, he just looked up and saw a freight train coming towards him, Boyd has to go".
No commentary required.
Cornes comments seem to be more balanced than his earlier efforts in the past. Anyhow I was trying to compliment Kane for coming out and strongly supporting Boyd - and saying the AFL should be looking at penalising Mansell ducking action.What do you mean matured? Any fool can see that the Richmond player ducked into it, you don't have to be Einstein to see that. We could see it at the ground from a mile away, what a joke they even reported Boyd, bunch of dickheads.
Robbo would say if it was Maynard that it was ok because he plays the game hard and praise his attack on the ball
Robbo is just another Essendon supporting knobhead
Concern for the AFL is if Mansell is not reprimanded for this dangerous action this will only encourage others….and Duck season will have been extended this year.
Slobbo Robbo is an absolute potato head - on Monday night Scott and Bevo were giving it to him for his ****wit interpretations on other matters...
For him to say Boyd was a freight train shows he has no ****ing idea what so ever
We really need some good footy journos in the media - seems to be a bit of a glut atm
Good arguments couldn’t be much better
If we’re being real Blind Freddy could tell that’s why there was a visible deliberate ducking motion. No other reason to do itI actually don't think it's good. It appears (to me) to introduce the need to prove Mansell's intention was to draw a free by ducking.
I reckon it will stand based on this but hope I'm wrong!
No words