That wasn't anything to do with the value of our F1. GC gave Port the ultimatum on the Houston deal or 13 was off to us.LOL. You couldnt get 13 for a F1... but yet you're hoping to get 10 & 11 for it? Funny.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
That wasn't anything to do with the value of our F1. GC gave Port the ultimatum on the Houston deal or 13 was off to us.LOL. You couldnt get 13 for a F1... but yet you're hoping to get 10 & 11 for it? Funny.
So what do you reckon this does to his draft ranking, especially vis-a-vis Berry?Absolutely elite agility.
Fantastic speed and vertical.
Really poor endurance. Especially for his size. Hes essentially getting lapped by the best runners in only a 2km with that time, or lapped about 4 times in a 5km
Interesting all the talk of deep, even draft but several clubs happy to go with close to minimum picks.
I don’t believe pink is a rookie
That was using last year's list of rookies...as you know it's 38 on the primary and 6 rookie listed players making it 44 - we had 2 (?) extra rookie spots from the assistance package.I don’t believe pink is a rookie
But if he is that explains why we don’t need to delist another player off the senior list
In that scenario we would be 35 senior list and 6 rookies
So would have 3 senior list spots and no rookie spots
Old mate Chadwiko just mentioned pink is senior listThat was using last year's list of rookies...as you know it's 38 on the primary and the rest will be made of rookie listed players - we had 2 (?) extra rookie spots from the assistance package.
Fair, our board is full of biased crap as well. I've liked some of the objectivity that one or two of your posters have commented to ensure there is some level of balance to what's likely in making a decision around pick 2.
If you would like my honest view is that both Rawlings and Hartley have both been on record as saying (1) we'd like to split pick 2 / or get another pick in the 1st round and (2) its unlikely we will try to trade up from pick 6 - respectively.
I dont really see any way either club is going to be satisfied in doing a deal. From my (understandably biased) perspective, l would be comfortable with these two scenarios:
1) Richmond trade 11 & 20 to GWS for 15 & 16. We then trade 10 & 15 to you. Which l suspect none of you would be happy about.
2) Richmond offer pick 6 & 23 for pick 2. Which l suspect none of you would be happy about.
I know you're answer to this, but if you could stomach one of these outcomes, which would you prefer?
Re: using your F1. I think one of your very astute posters outlined that anyone willing to take futures, you bare all the risk (unless you're a club looking to buy points for academy/FS selections. Outside of that, l think you'd be lucky to get any club before our pick 18 who would be willing to buy that F1. No club is going to relent on their position this year - even Richmond, who unfortunately hold a lot of the cards to continue to get 'overs' for teams desperate to be part of the pointy end of this years draft.
I'm not a poster who wants any other clubs supporters to try and suck an egg, because ultimately l think this year will become way too hard for any club to be satisfied in relenting their position in the 1st round. Whilst we look sexy right now given all the discussion has moved to the draft, reality is were going to be god f'ing awful for a few years and thats going to suck even if we can be chipper about watching some kids grow.
Happy for you to delete or berate me, just trying to read the play, knowing we both are unlikely to find a place where we both feel like winners in doing a deal.
Pick 6 must be in the deal. 6 and 11 or we use pick 2 in the draft. Ive had enough of this shit. You ****ers understand pick 2 is the second best pick of elite talent in the country right?
As noted in the other thread, with the club signing Cooper Harvey to a 1 year deal, we now have two available senior list positions, and two draft selections (2 + 62).
If we were to split pick 2 as many have speculated about, we'd need to end up with no more than a total of 2 total draft picks, or we need to delist a contracted player and pay out their remaining contract.
Primary | Cat A | Cat B | Total Rookie | Total List |
36 (Min) | 1 | 0 | 1 | 37 (min) |
36 (Min) | 1-6 | 0-2 | 8 | 44 |
38 (Max) | 0-6 | 0 | 6 | 44 |
We will delist a contracted player to move them to the rookie listLets clear the the rookie spots up and list size according to the lovely AFL:
Primary Cat A Cat B Total Rookie Total List 36 (Min) 1 0 1 37 (min) 36 (Min) 1-6 0-2 8 44 38 (Max) 0-6 0 6 44
So, yes Pinky goes up to the Primary list making it 36 again, so out of :
Payne
Maley
Dawson
Teakle
RHJ
Who will be promoted to the primary list knowing you only have 2 primary list spots open?
If we pick have #2, then he becomes the 37th player, if we split then you'd assume they are now the 37th and 38th players.
Would George be on the LTI in 2025, which opens up a primary list spot?
Im basing it off most of the best runners each year running just under 6 min 2km's.
5:50 2km = 5.71m/s
7:23 2km = 4.51m/s
5:50 = 350 seconds.
350 seconds @ 4.51m/s = 1580m
He'd get lapped 97m before the finish line on a 400m running circuit if they run tight to lane 1.
He gets lapped even on the old Docklands combine circuit, which was 409.12 meters per lap, which is the equivalent to running an athletic track in lane 2 for the duration. However the finish line was adjusted.
Sharp puts almost 1.5 laps (558m) on him with his record time (5:28).
5:28 is ridiculously quick though, Finn O'Sullivan would have only just beat him into to his last lap by 22m to prevent getting lapped himself based on this years combine.