Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
He will.I repeat take Tauru at 2 and save next years first. Finn O’Sullivan would want to become some player
nah we made the right move with FOS at 2I repeat take Tauru at 2 and save next years first. Finn O’Sullivan would want to become some player
Well we're kinda shooting from the stars.This is a type of thinking employed by astrologers.
yeah for me it comes back down to the player, because you are right in that situation I am just as outragedThis isn't any way cope but if we traded say pick 15-18 in for our ff and took him the outrage would be less? Sure we may have taken someone else in that pick range but how do we know? Mabie the club rated Matt highly and neally fell of the chairs that he was still available at the last pick tonight, we also got Tigers f2 which if we are being honest they will be paying a $1.05 to finish 18th next year. First pick of the second round are always valuable but but that pick will slide out, who cares if pick 19 becomes pick 29 its still the fist pick of the second night. The whole trade is a disaster if we finish bottom 4 and Matt doesn't make it, thats is the only tangible here.
I hope we use the lack of an F1 as a mindset changer as to who we are and what we expect from ourselves: mid table in 2025.
Clearly the trade period reflects an instruction from the top that it is time to start winning. It's only so long that 'process-focus' stays credible. We have underperformed for years, symbolised by 'good-mate' LMac selected by what seems a frustrated but mysteriously complacent team. Meanwhile our ladies are furious at losing a GF, work their arses off and come back in exquisite shape to deliver one of the most dominant seasons ever.
This trade can be a symbol of what expectations are and the attitude and focus tneeded to meet them.
Being paid and employed doesn't always correlate to actually bring good at a jobI'll trust the experts to bè honest ole mate
Those that are employed and paid
Caleb Daniel was contracted to 2026 we had to pay a pick in the 20's MINIMUM to get anyone to come to our shit show let alone a former AA, Club F&B and Premiership Player who is contracted for another 2 years..nah we made the right move with FOS at 2
its the caleb daniel trade that ****ed us
we had the kpp to take at that pick and wouldnt need to touch our f1
we didn't need to get him at that priceCaleb Daniel was contracted to 2026 we had to pay a pick in the 20's MINIMUM to get anyone to come to our shit show let alone a former AA, Club F&B and Premiership Player who is contracted for another 2 years..
Christ, Daniel Rioli went for pick 6 and whilst their age and career have been almost identical, CD averages 6 more disposals, more marks, more rebounds out of 50 and 60m gained per game than Rioli FFS..
Don't know why I'm explaining it to you because you aint the full quid. Probably need to get the crayons out..
Agreed.
But whats the breakeven scenario here?
7th or 8th? That's only an additional 11 wins and 50% of percentage.......... Even then I still think it's a loss, as it's going to be a pick in the early teens for Pick 25ish and 27.
We'd be paying about 20/1 to make the final at the moment. So a 5% chance at a breakeven scenario.... About an 80% chance this goes down as one of the worst trade blunders ever.
Even then you have to consider the Daniel trade in conjunction with what has happened here, as it's relevant.
10 weeks ago, we had 2, 28, F1.
We walk away with FOS, Caleb Daniel and Matt Whitlock with the hand. I dunno about you, but that could have been turned into anyone we wanted during trade week.
We could have walked away with both the Whitlocks if we wanted to.
The Daniel trade was an absolute shocker given his age, he's doubled down on it here.
I hate to say it, but I called it at trade week r.e Clarko. I just knew the club was going to throw caution to the wind as it's pretty much now or never for him. He won't be North's coach if we are battling for a spoon the next 24 months.
However, based on this trade, none of them will be in job in 12 months time if we finish in the bottom 3.
Top response.. just walk awaywe didn't need to get him at that price
should have walked away
let me know if you want me to get those crayons out to explain further to your simple mind
Do you have the comparison in testing numbers? I keep seeing people mentioning Matt as the superior athlete but in all the testing I've seen Jack seems to outperform MattPlenty of people have had Matt ahead for parts of the year.
Jack is the more rounded footballer at this stage, but Matt is the far better athlete.
It's a little bit the opposite of the McKay twins. But the comparisons are apt. Matt = Harry in terms of the athletic gifts compared to Ben = Jack.
However in that instance Harry was also the more accomplished junior footballer. It's the opposite at the moment.
100% should have walked away from the deal if they dont accept a future secondTop response.. just walk away
Come on jay317, we got the players we wanted in the trade period and in the draft so far we got the two players who were in our top couple of picks on our whiteboard, we have paid a little more but that was always going to happen, I'm happy with "The little shark" and "Matlock", now the question is who is our last player on Thursday night?Hilarious. Backed us into a corner after trade period and folded like a deck chair at the draft.