- Mar 25, 2019
- 14,315
- 29,351
- AFL Club
- Carlton
Didn't we win that game by 10? Not sure a single kick umpiring decision would have been the differenceWould be second if gather round wasn’t fixed!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Didn't we win that game by 10? Not sure a single kick umpiring decision would have been the differenceWould be second if gather round wasn’t fixed!
Its easier to have a low loss % if you're only focused on stopping your man. Weitering is the worst by a fair way at intercepts. The rest peel of and chop up oposition attacks, but that does leave them short sometimes and out of position causing them to lose 1v1's on occasion.Does Weitering serious have a 7% 1v1 loss percentage....
I'm not to sure a loss in that situation contributes to the 1v1 percentage. But you have a point regarding the offense weitering is behind a few of his peers. A 7% loss percentage is phenomenal though.Its easier to have a low loss % if you're only focused on stopping your man. Weitering is the worst by a fair way at intercepts. The rest peel of and chop up oposition attacks, but that does leave them short sometimes and out of position causing them to lose 1v1's on occasion.
Yes, because the umpire gave a free kick for dissent when he "wasn't sure what was actually said"Didn't we win that game by 10? Not sure a single kick umpiring decision would have been the difference
After paying a mark that was touched off the boot then rebounded of Aishs arm.Yes, because the umpire gave a free kick for dissent when he "wasn't sure what was actually said"
Most things featuring Waterman end up looking like a joke.Waterman made Pearce look like a joke.
If they get to a contest out of position because they've rolled of onto another player or rolled back onto their original oponent is it techncially a 1v1? Would imagine so.I'm not to sure a loss in that situation contributes to the 1v1 percentage. But you have a point regarding the offense weitering is behind a few of his peers. A 7% loss percentage is phenomenal though.
Would think it would in that case your correct. Hopefully in team defence someone has rolled over from the fat side but I'm sure these last line defenders do occasionally get caught out playing offensively without cover.If they get to a contest out of position because they've rolled of onto another player or rolled back onto their oringial oponent is it techncially a 1v1? Would imagine so.
"Alex is equal #1 shot at goal percentage AFL and Club (100%)".Pearce is behind all four in his loss % by a fair margin. He's at 26.8%, which is hardly terrible, but not to Weitering (7.1%), Taylor (11.5%), May (12.5%) or Andrews (14.3%) level. He's ahead of Weitering offensively (more SI and SL) but behind the other three.
You can mount a case of having him ahead of Weitering, but the other three are ahead.
Lefau did a pretty good job on him tooWaterman made Pearce look like a joke.
Did a number on your hapless side.Most things featuring Waterman end up looking like a joke.
Blues fans have the same carry on Tigers fans gave everyone... But have started before they've won anything.Ironic, coming from you.
To be fair, McKay's been your most damaging forward this season and was in red hot form heading into that game (11 goals in3 games coming in).Pearce also left a 3rd gamer in Draper to have his pants pulled down by Curnow while he took McKay and twiddled his thumbs in the goal square.
Its easier to have a low loss % if you're only focused on stopping your man. Weitering is the worst by a fair way at intercepts. The rest peel of and chop up oposition attacks, but that does leave them short sometimes and out of position causing them to lose 1v1's on occasion.
McKay, also Coleman medalist and when we played was arguably the Top 3 in-form players of the comp. It's a shame we were missing Cox that day but is it was it is.Intercepts are for the modern day CHB. Weitering is the best FB in the comp and you wouldn’t catch him sitting on the oppositions second best forward whilst a 3rd gamer gets hammered by a Coleman Medallist. 4% better 1v1 loss rate than the next best KPD is significant. He wins more footy than Taylor and Pearce and averages a whole 0.2 less touches than Andrews, so the idea that he is only a negative stopper is silly. The only thing that might be in his way of a jacket is the games he missed early on and he wouldn’t want to miss anymore.
Wow such an arrogant statement - you couldn’t even remember what happened in the dying moments of the rigged victory in AdelaideThis reads exactly like every other Freo defender. Chip chip footy skews these metrics massively.
I actually think Clark has been AA/AA squad worthy, but half of these metrics are absolutely useless given the system Freo plays.
Intercepts, score involvements, intercept marks, one percenters, defensive half pressure acts and tackles all metrics that I'd rate higher than effective kicks, uncontested marks and effective disposals.
Mind you Clark rates fairly well on most of these anyway... He's been very good this season.
EfaRegarding Hawthorn recent run of form who would be the players in contention for a spot in the squad at this stage?
Moore is the obvious one as a small forward.
Just interesting when you consider we are 6-2 since Rd 6 and have only lost to Sydney and Port. Moore is the only one I have at this stage well and he is a very good chance at the team, but if the form some how maintains for the 2nd half of the year surly a few more start getting a look in.
Holmes in the first few picked.Something like this maybe? Was actually pretty hard to put together
FB: Wilmot, Andrew, Mcvee
HB: Sheezel, Weddle, Wanganeen-Milera
C: D'Ambrosio, Wardlaw, Soligo
HF: Reid, Cadman, Humphrey
FF: Owens, Amiss, Dempsey
Foll: Darcy, Daicos, Horne-Francis
Int: Callaghan, Ginbey, Macdonald, Rachele