List Mgmt. 2024 Trade & List Management Thread

[My Left Foote]

Max King BFSKAAK, mad saints family and the focal point of their side.

Not sure they'd want to deal or we'd want to go near paying overs.

If we were wrenching a KFF from somewhere for big overs Walter would be more like it, not that GC would even take the call.

If Joe Daniher can leave * then anything is possible. Having said that, even though he should leave, I don’t think he will and they won’t let him.

 

[koshari]

nah if we go for a KPF it should be Cadman who got dropped to the vfl last week

And could be lured home to vic

Be nice but no way they trade him after selling the farm to get him. He wont hit his straps for another 18 months. Hogans probably a comparable development curve. They are good at the long game. Mcartney and quayle are not dills.

 

[blisk]

float our first this year for Lukosious see if we can get a bite.

An AFL standard second KPF is our number one need. We’ve seen the improvement with just pink/teakle playing forward, imagine pink replaced with someone who’s an actual offensive threat

 

[Sphynx]

float our first this year for Lukosious see if we can get a bite.

An AFL standard second KPF is our number one need. We’ve seen the improvement with just pink/teakle playing forward, imagine pink replaced with someone who’s an actual offensive threat

The offensive juggernaut that’s kicked over 30 goals once in his career to date?

 

[kirbonavich]

float our first this year for Lukosious see if we can get a bite.

An AFL standard second KPF is our number one need. We’ve seen the improvement with just pink/teakle playing forward, imagine pink replaced with someone who’s an actual offensive threat

That's more disgusting than my choice in women at 4am on Kings Street.

 

[Dan]

float our first this year for Lukosious see if we can get a bite.

An AFL standard second KPF is our number one need. We’ve seen the improvement with just pink/teakle playing forward, imagine pink replaced with someone who’s an actual offensive threat

 

[The Nostradamus]

float our first this year for Lukosious see if we can get a bite.

An AFL standard second KPF is our number one need. We’ve seen the improvement with just pink/teakle playing forward, imagine pink replaced with someone who’s an actual offensive threat

Bailey Scott and a second rounder for lukosious

 

[JGreezy]

Is Lukosious really a KPF? Or is he a tall flanker?

Would we still need Dawson/Teakle/Maley in there to take contested marks?

 

[Sphynx]

Is Lukosious really a KPF? Or is he a tall flanker?

Would we still need Dawson/Teakle/Maley in there to take contested marks?

He’s basically a slightly better Jack Watts at this point.

 

[JGreezy]

He’s basically a slightly better Jack Watts at this point.

Eww...

We could use a guy who maybe isn't as skilled and efficient as Larkey but who is a better contested mark. A good enough player that if you put all of the attention on Larkey then they might kick 3 or 4.

 

[shinboner magic]

Eww...

We could use a guy who maybe isn't as skilled and efficient as Larkey but who is a better contested mark. A good enough player that if you put all of the attention on Larkey then they might kick 3 or 4.

Taberner from Freo
Day from GC
Lobb from dogs

 

[archereleven]

Taberner from Freo
Day from GC
Lobb from dogs

Casboult

On SM-G991B using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[chubbspeterson]

I'm sure Zane would be so thrilled with us trading for Lukosius. FMD.

 

[giantroo]

 

[tales129]

Get good ball users that aren’t getting games at other clubs. - Cummings should be top of that list.

Bang.

He’s coming back from a calf injury and looked bloody solid against the cows.

I’d be having a crack here - 25 year old with plenty of footy left

 

[Jakooli]

Jake Riccardi would be the perfect KPF for us to target. Just at the right age, possible go home factor, no sure thing at his current club. If we start putting the groundwork into him now it could really pay off when his contract finishes in 2 years.

 

[Sphynx]

Jake Riccardi would be the perfect KPF for us to target. Just at the right age, possible go home factor, no sure thing at his current club. If we start putting the groundwork into him now it could really pay off when his contract finishes in 2 years.

I'd probably be targeting Gruzewski the hardest this offseason.

In fact he'd probably be on the podium for most players in the comp for cost vs what need they would fill for us.


Put our R2 or F2 on the table and GWS basically get back what they paid for him.

He signed in 2023 to 2026, but they can't fit all of Hogan, Riccardi, Brown, Cadman and Gruzewski into the side and Gruz and Cadman are just going to erode in value in 2025 if neither of them play full seasons.

I feel that they will see Gruzewski far more expendable from both a list build and PR perspective than losing Cadman.

He was a big BFNAAK (not that it matters, but it will obviously help in securing interest from the players side) and he's been one of the leading goal kickers in the VFL the last 18 months despite being a teenager.

He fits the age demographic of our list perfectly and he's had his initial 2 years of VFL football and physical development. He should be ready for 22 games of football from Rnd 1 next year, like Larkey was at this point of his career.

He's very mobile and athletic also and can play as a 2nd/3rd forward. You could afford to play Larkey, Gruzewski and Teakle in one side.

He basically fills Pinks roll, but is a natural forward with fantastic athletic ability and good hands. We can then move Pink back as a depth position and see if he is a capable AFL defender in a more settled system not being pumped by 12 goals a game.

He's stuck out all year as someone who should be our #1 trade target at the moment, as it's entirely realistic. Given the starting spot on offer, we have picks in the right range to do it and the fact he was a die hard supporter, you would assume he'd be open to it also.

 

[TennisPlayerAndy]

I'd probably be targeting Gruzewski the hardest this offseason.

In fact he'd probably be on the podium for most players in the comp for cost vs what need they would fill for us.


Put our R2 or F2 on the table and GWS basically get back what they paid for him.

He signed in 2023 to 2026, but they can't fit all of Hogan, Riccardi, Brown, Cadman and Gruzewski into the side and Gruz and Cadman are just going to erode in value in 2025 if neither of them play full seasons.

I feel that they will see Gruzewski far more expendable from both a list build and PR perspective than losing Cadman.

He was a big BFNAAK (not that it matters, but it will obviously help in securing interest from the players side) and he's been one of the leading goal kickers in the VFL the last 18 months despite being a teenager.

He fits the age demographic of our list perfectly and he's had his initial 2 years of VFL football and physical development. He should be ready for 22 games of football from Rnd 1 next year, like Larkey was at this point of his career.

He's very mobile and athletic also and can play as a 2nd/3rd forward. You could afford to play Larkey, Gruzewski and Teakle in one side.

He basically fills Pinks roll, but is a natural forward with fantastic athletic ability and good hands. We can then move Pink back as a depth position and see if he is a capable AFL defender in a more settled system not being pumped by 12 goals a game.

He's stuck out all year as someone who should be our #1 trade target at the moment, as it's entirely realistic. Given the starting spot on offer, we have picks in the right range to do it and the fact he was a die hard supporter, you would assume he'd be open to it also.

Comben, Dawson and Logue all better defenders.

Pink is purely depth and is only playing due to the destitute KPF stocks we possess.

 

[Sphynx]

Comben, Dawson and Logue all better defenders.

Pink is purely depth and is only playing due to the destitute KPF stocks we possess.

Yeah I know he is.

I was merely saying recruiting someone like Gruewski we will give him an opportunity to settle into some VFL football at full back and even the odd appearance there when required.

He's been thrown to the wolves to an extent.

 

[4cunningTonneTruck]

I'd probably be targeting Gruzewski the hardest this offseason.

In fact he'd probably be on the podium for most players in the comp for cost vs what need they would fill for us.


Put our R2 or F2 on the table and GWS basically get back what they paid for him.

He signed in 2023 to 2026, but they can't fit all of Hogan, Riccardi, Brown, Cadman and Gruzewski into the side and Gruz and Cadman are just going to erode in value in 2025 if neither of them play full seasons.

I feel that they will see Gruzewski far more expendable from both a list build and PR perspective than losing Cadman.

He was a big BFNAAK (not that it matters, but it will obviously help in securing interest from the players side) and he's been one of the leading goal kickers in the VFL the last 18 months despite being a teenager.

He fits the age demographic of our list perfectly and he's had his initial 2 years of VFL football and physical development. He should be ready for 22 games of football from Rnd 1 next year, like Larkey was at this point of his career.

He's very mobile and athletic also and can play as a 2nd/3rd forward. You could afford to play Larkey, Gruzewski and Teakle in one side.

He basically fills Pinks roll, but is a natural forward with fantastic athletic ability and good hands. We can then move Pink back as a depth position and see if he is a capable AFL defender in a more settled system not being pumped by 12 goals a game.

He's stuck out all year as someone who should be our #1 trade target at the moment, as it's entirely realistic. Given the starting spot on offer, we have picks in the right range to do it and the fact he was a die hard supporter, you would assume he'd be open to it also.

He will also help put bums on seats once he starts flying for marks

 

[shinboner magic]

Who’s a top draft pick that hasn’t shown much and probably isn’t up to it- that’s the player we will get

 

[Sphynx]

Who’s a top draft pick that hasn’t shown much and probably isn’t up to it- that’s the player we will get

Josh Sinn, come on down!

 

[PokerRoo]

Jordan Croft at the Dogs is someone who I would be looking at. He isn't getting a game anytime soon with JUH, Darcy and Naughton. He is going to be waiting a long time to get his chance.

 

[bengrina]

Who’s a top draft pick that hasn’t shown much and probably isn’t up to it- that’s the player we will get

Mckercher?
Wardlaw?
Sheezel?

 

[giantroo]