List Mgmt. 2024 Trade Thread - No.2

Remove this Banner Ad

Why bother with Tomlinson? It would be such a nothing acquisition. You’re better off combing through the state leagues for the best young defenders - time and time again standout performers at that level are very good AFL players.
Yep , Tomlinson is nothing special would rather player Cordy.. tbh.
 
Hunter clark has, in almost every respect, become luke dunstan mk2.

No tank, speed or spread- can only play ~50-60% time on ground.
But maddenly gets the pill ~20 times in half a game.

Not worth trading at this point- but FMD, can't we send him to the himalayas or something for 6 months to magically improve his aerobic capacity??!!

The difference is he uses the ball well and is actually damaging. Very handy mid to rotate through
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Why bother with Tomlinson? It would be such a nothing acquisition. You’re better off combing through the state leagues for the best young defenders - time and time again standout performers at that level are very good AFL players.

Because Tomlinson is a proven AFL player & state leaguers are not & he is a break glass situation.


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
 
*hypothetical

IF battle signed on,
Would people trade out next years future first for a pick in the top 10 this year to snag two midfielders and a faster year of development ?
I would not want us to trade our future 1st. We do not know where we will finish next year.
I want more 1st round picks this year and next.
 
If you are going to target anyone from the 2022 draft, i'd go for Humphrey. Far superior proposition to Tsatas and Hobbs. Would cost more but there is an A grader in there that hasn't come out yet.
Loved him in his draft year but has gone nowhere up on the GC. They must rate him he’s played 40 games but almost exclusively as a small forward.
 
I agree- he is like a slippery eel in the clinches.

The problem is that a footy oval is over 2000 square metres.

A phonebox is what- about 2 squares?

Crouch could run all day extracting the pill- hunter only being capable of playing half a game (and being gassed for large parts of that 50%)- means we are down half a bench rotation every week.


Over the course of a season- that's a LOT of extra running his midfield teammates need to do to cover him.
Especially in an endurance taxing gameplan like ross the boss plays.

To offset that- we need clark to be an absolute star, not a meat and potatoes extractor like crouch.

The eagles had a similar problem with nic nat- he couldn't play more than ~50% time on ground.
But they took that on the chin- because the star stuff he did in that 50%, made up for that extra ~30% he was sitting on the pine.

In summary- if clark is able to star in his 50% time on ground- that's fine.
But being a meat and potatoes extractor AND only 50% TOG... yeah nah- trade him and give his mid minutes to windy etc.
1724792543593.png
Clearly it wasn’t a problem for him then. The guy has been injured and had problems in the preseason, he looks gassed in some games this year but clearly he’s capable of much more. Trade him and play windhager in the mids, yeah nah.
 
Heard on SEN that a caller said take it to the bank Membrey to North on 3 year deal.

If that is the case would you deal with North who seem to want Trainor but not at pick 2, by swapping our first this year and next, Membrey for pick 2 and North's this and next year 2nd rounders and a third.

Points are similar. North get their man and a ffrdp and a third forward for the now, we get who we want as a mid at 2 and a swing at a good player at 22.

If Battle leaves and we get pick 9 then we have a chance at Reid, Langford or Lalor.

Also heard Ivan Soldo wants to come back to Melbourne for personal reasons, ship off North's 3rd and hello Ivan.

Going to be a very interesting trade period.....oh it's a no to Petracca

On SM-S916B using BigFooty.com mobile app
 
Heard on SEN that a caller said take it to the bank Membrey to North on 3 year deal.

If that is the case would you deal with North who seem to want Trainor but not at pick 2, by swapping our first this year and next, Membrey for pick 2 and North's this and next year 2nd rounders and a third.

Points are similar. North get their man and a ffrdp and a third forward for the now, we get who we want as a mid at 2 and a swing at a good player at 22.

If Battle leaves and we get pick 9 then we have a chance at Reid, Langford or Lalor.

Also heard Ivan Soldo wants to come back to Melbourne for personal reasons, ship off North's 3rd and hello Ivan.

Going to be a very interesting trade period.....oh it's a no to Petracca

On SM-S916B using BigFooty.com mobile app
We will get nothing for Membrey as he becomes a free agent for life due to being delisted by Sydney
 
“St Kilda will not pursue contracted Bombers midfielder Dylan Shiel in this year’s trade period with the club taking a long-term approach to their list build, according to sources familiar with the Saints’ approach.

Although their midfield has been the source of frustration at times in 2024, with opponents getting hold of them at centre clearances and stoppages in some games, they are determined to use draft picks to bring in and develop talent.

The Saints already have emerging players such as Darcy Wilson, Nasiah Wanganeen-Milera, Mitch Owens, Marcus Windhager and Mattaes Phillipou.

They had pick five in their hands until Jack Higgins’ miracle goal against the Blues moved them two spots up the ladder, meaning they have pick seven (or eight), depending on where the bid for Lions’ father-son Levi Ashcroft lands, in this year’s draft.

They are also waiting on Josh Battle to tell them whether he wants to continue with the club or accept an offer to join the Hawks, with the 25-year-old to take a break before finalising his decision.

If Battle leaves, the club could have two top-10 picks in a strong draft, depending on the level of compensation they receive, which would give them flexibility to potentially chase a player or add two quality youngsters to their emerging list via the draft.

In the process, the Saints have been busy, extending small forward Dan Butler for two seasons, with Jimmy Webster also expected to remain. Dougal Howard was open to a move but looks likely to stay with St Kilda.

The Saints are comfortable with Tim Membrey exploring his options as an unrestricted free agent, with the 30-year-old recapturing his ability to consistently score late in the season with 14 goals in the final six matches.

St Kilda on Tuesday delisted Tom Campbell, Riley Bonner, Matthew Allison and James Van Es.”

The Age - https://www.theage.com.au/sport/afl...mons-remains-a-long-shot-20240826-p5k5eu.html
 
They will be giving them to Richmond
We’ll see, those deals still need to be done and I doubt they’ll be quite as generous as some are predicting. GC for example have no need to overpay and trade their first. No one is bidding on Lombard before their pick and you’d laugh and let them have him if they did.
 
View attachment 2094294
Clearly it wasn’t a problem for him then. The guy has been injured and had problems in the preseason, he looks gassed in some games this year but clearly he’s capable of much more. Trade him and play windhager in the mids, yeah nah.
2020 was four years ago, and since then Hunter has had serious injuries and been off the field for a long time- he is talented, but time marches on.
 
“St Kilda will not pursue contracted Bombers midfielder Dylan Shiel in this year’s trade period with the club taking a long-term approach to their list build, according to sources familiar with the Saints’ approach.

Although their midfield has been the source of frustration at times in 2024, with opponents getting hold of them at centre clearances and stoppages in some games, they are determined to use draft picks to bring in and develop talent.

The Saints already have emerging players such as Darcy Wilson, Nasiah Wanganeen-Milera, Mitch Owens, Marcus Windhager and Mattaes Phillipou.

They had pick five in their hands until Jack Higgins’ miracle goal against the Blues moved them two spots up the ladder, meaning they have pick seven (or eight), depending on where the bid for Lions’ father-son Levi Ashcroft lands, in this year’s draft.

They are also waiting on Josh Battle to tell them whether he wants to continue with the club or accept an offer to join the Hawks, with the 25-year-old to take a break before finalising his decision.

If Battle leaves, the club could have two top-10 picks in a strong draft, depending on the level of compensation they receive, which would give them flexibility to potentially chase a player or add two quality youngsters to their emerging list via the draft.

In the process, the Saints have been busy, extending small forward Dan Butler for two seasons, with Jimmy Webster also expected to remain. Dougal Howard was open to a move but looks likely to stay with St Kilda.

The Saints are comfortable with Tim Membrey exploring his options as an unrestricted free agent, with the 30-year-old recapturing his ability to consistently score late in the season with 14 goals in the final six matches.

St Kilda on Tuesday delisted Tom Campbell, Riley Bonner, Matthew Allison and James Van Es.”

The Age - https://www.theage.com.au/sport/afl...mons-remains-a-long-shot-20240826-p5k5eu.html
I know I've gone on about it a lot, but Howard staying is a relief. Needing to replace two key defenders at once would have been a nightmare and a significant setback for our elite backline.

Also good to hear Shiel is a no, but we still do need someone mature to help take the load off Steele. Hopefully we are exploring a Macrae or Parker type.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Thank God no frigging Sheil.
We can discuss trades without delusional Injector supporters demanding pick 7 and Jack Sinclair for him.
What a relief....

On SM-S908E using BigFooty.com mobile app
 
View attachment 2094294
Clearly it wasn’t a problem for him then. The guy has been injured and had problems in the preseason, he looks gassed in some games this year but clearly he’s capable of much more. Trade him and play windhager in the mids, yeah nah.
Clearly he didn't have a lot of competition either , some are doing 17kms per game so that's a fair drop off
 
It is the fact he had little preseason. Dow was the same, Jones slightly better.

All three started to shoe a bit with a block of games. Jones and Clark really started to look like the players we wanted and Dow's last couple of games gives me hope for improvement.
However JVE just showed what will happen if you continue to be injured. Bonner showed what happens when you don't tackle.

On SM-S908E using BigFooty.com mobile app

You're 100% right but at the same time, fitness is always going to be an uphill battle for Hunter imo.

Some guys (not many) can miss 4-6 weeks and come back and get 30 touches straight off the bat.

Clark does take time to build and therefore injury interruptions will hamper him more than most.
 
View attachment 2094294
Clearly it wasn’t a problem for him then. The guy has been injured and had problems in the preseason, he looks gassed in some games this year but clearly he’s capable of much more. Trade him and play windhager in the mids, yeah nah.

Its distance covered at high speed that matters. I have a feeling this is where Clark struggles.
 
We might be onto a new innovative game plan here: Draft #7 Murphy Reid + #8 Tobie Travalgia.

Stick them both at Half back, who needs mids when you can have 7 Running half-back/Wingers? Sinclair, Bonner, NWM, Hill, Travaglia, Reid, Henry and Wilson


Geelong actually pretty much did that in their flag year. Gave up the midfield to concentrate all their best players to attack off HB. Richmond barely competed in clearance but won three flags.

Lyon fetishised that Geelong flag side so don’t laugh. He’s also never really liked plodder one position mids preferring spread runners, two way mids or guys who can play more than one role.
 
I just had a look at his VFL stats he is hardly setting the world on fire averaging 1 goal a game, 11 disposals & 4 tackles, he would want to come cheaply.

You’d be buying on potential not a ready made player. He’s well regarded at Sydney.
 
Can't believe he's lasted this long on a list. Very clear early on in his career that he simply wasn't up to it. Coasted on his "Pick 2" status for years, not because of him so much, but due to other clubs delusions and being blinded by their own headlights.
He might go okay in the country leagues.


Feel a bit sorry for him. I remember Robert Murphy saying that his a forward pocket or wing born into a KP size frame. Like Mason Wood clubs kept trying to turn him into what he wasn’t rather that play him to his strengths.
 
*hypothetical

IF battle signed on,
Would people trade out next years future first for a pick in the top 10 this year to snag two midfielders and a faster year of development ?

Possibly but can’t see anyone wanting to do it. Next year is a weaker draft. I’m not usually keen on selling future picks either. Clubs always regret it and try to trade players in desperation when they want back in.
 
That is the same as getting Thomas to the club - would you let any knob play in our jumper.

I have no issues with Petracca the person but his age goes against everything we have been doing since Lyon arrived. To get him probably costs us 2 prime draft picks and is probably more likely to delay a flag that win us one. He’d get us memberships and hype but not sure he's the right fit for us.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

List Mgmt. 2024 Trade Thread - No.2

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top