USA 2024 US Presidential Election: Trump vs Harris (pt II)

[Bloods86]

It's too big to rig by now I daresay. After the garbage truck troll and the Aldrin endorsement, it's hard to see Trump winning less than 400 EC votes!

Troll.

Aldrin has supported Republicans for ages.

Arnie is more popular and has today endorsed Harris.

 

[Bloods86]

Can one of you Trump haters explain why Democrat run states don’t want voter ID? Wouldn’t have anything to do with letting 20 million illegals cross the border and then fill out ballots would it?

Because it's an unnecessary requirement for a non existent problem.

 

[Farmer2Goggin]

TRICK OR TREAT???

View attachment 2155303

The life size depiction of Arnold Palmers junk in the foreground adds a nice touch

 

[Ghost Patrol]

Show me 1 instance where glitches favour Trump.

 

[Bloods86]

Take it easy mate. We’re just talking politics. No need to get personal.

Politics is personal. Of course, I could understand why Trump supporters don't want to be personally associated with his rhetoric, policy and actions.

 

[Bloods86]

Show me 1 instance where glitches favour Trump.

Show us a proven instance where a glitch has favoured Democrats.

 

[Mick F]

Don't you get it though? It's people like you who are trying to vote in a regime that will strip away the reproductive rights of females and make life horrible for a whole lot of people based on the colour of their skin.

It's not just politics, this shit affects peoples lives.

Politics - the activities associated with making decisions in a group, in particular the governance of a country.

At least he didn’t claim he was discussing the merits of policies.

 

[Randomizor]

Because it's an unnecessary requirement for a non existent problem.

It’s also disingenuous to be so absolute by saying they don’t want it at all.

I’m sure if they were given a voter ID proposal that accounted for the potential issues then they’d consider it. It’d have to outline what ID’s would be acceptable. Funding would need to be provided to put money towards educating the citizens how to get an ID. Money put towards establishing new offices in non-city areas that could provide said ID’s. And probably a bunch of other things I can’t think of right now.

In other words, if the republicans came to the democrats and said “Here’s how we think we can require voter ID and here’s all the ways we are going to make it possible for every citizen to be able to get an ID”, I think they’d be more open to it.

Right now all they say is “Enact voter ID laws and the citizens can figure the rest out”

It’s so hard to see why that’s not compelling

 

[100action]

Show us a proven instance where a glitch has favoured Democrats.

90% of things including glitches on mainstream information channels favor Democrats and actively takes positions against Republicans.

Bezos' Washington Post article is spot on in the sense this style of reporting has reduced the credibility of these publications to the point social media like X has well and truly taken over in engagement metrics for how people get their news

I suppose the democrat cope is that "but but Trump is all bad, and Kamala is only good, maybe if you operated based on facts you'd see this!"

 

[Mick F]

Because it's an unnecessary requirement for a non existent problem.

The aim obviously being to cut the administrative costs of governing, so as to deliver more services (and investment in infrastructure and human capital) to the community.

 

[GreyCrow]

90% of things including glitches on mainstream information channels favor Democrats and actively takes positions against Republicans.

Bezos' Washington Post article is spot on in the sense this style of reporting has reduced the credibility of these publications to the point social media like X has well and truly taken over in engagement metrics for how people get their news

I suppose the democrat cope is that "but but Trump is all bad, and Kamala is only good, maybe if you operated based on facts you'd see this!"


View attachment 2155331

Diddums

 

[iDon]

nowhere does it say the democrats were favored by this glitch, and this is the reason why both parties have election overseers. Because mistakes happen, get discovered, and corrected.

Weird how you are so outraged over the system working.

It has been debunked, but the poor GOP are unable to have basic understanding of the system in play. ReidBetweenTheLines has refused to acknowledge the post or at least give a rebuttal.

Move on.

 

[iDon]

90% of things including glitches on mainstream information channels favor Democrats and actively takes positions against Republicans.

Bezos' Washington Post article is spot on in the sense this style of reporting has reduced the credibility of these publications to the point social media like X has well and truly taken over in engagement metrics for how people get their news

I suppose the democrat cope is that "but but Trump is all bad, and Kamala is only good, maybe if you operated based on facts you'd see this!"


View attachment 2155331

Now do FOX

 

[iDon]

Now do FOX

Oh my bad, they are the source.

"Trust me bro"

 

[Bloods86]

-------


Apologies if already posted but how long until we get the "I always preferred Sly!"

Reckon Seagal would be their hero these days.

Great post by Arnie. Calling out the tax cut for (mostly) the rich, contrasting being American over being Republican etc.

 

[100action]

Oh my bad, they are the source.

"Trust me bro"

Fox (and perhaps the NY Post) is the 10%.

Now do the remaining 90% (NBC,CNN, The Guardian, Bloomberg, Time, MSNBC, New York Times, ABC news, etc)

I'll wait

 

[Ghost Patrol]

90% of things including glitches on mainstream information channels favor Democrats and actively takes positions against Republicans.

Bezos' Washington Post article is spot on in the sense this style of reporting has reduced the credibility of these publications to the point social media like X has well and truly taken over in engagement metrics for how people get their news

I suppose the democrat cope is that "but but Trump is all bad, and Kamala is only good, maybe if you operated based on facts you'd see this!"


View attachment 2155331

Nice meme. 85% Trump in the first sentence = 31% Trump in the third sentence.

Numbers aren't really your thing, are they?

 

[Bloods86]

90% of things including glitches on mainstream information channels favor Democrats and actively takes positions against Republicans.

Bezos' Washington Post article is spot on in the sense this style of reporting has reduced the credibility of these publications to the point social media like X has well and truly taken over in engagement metrics for how people get their news

I suppose the democrat cope is that "but but Trump is all bad, and Kamala is only good, maybe if you operated based on facts you'd see this!"


View attachment 2155331

We're not talking about media, we're talking about vote counting.

In any case, engagement doesn't equate to credibility.

It takes all of 2 seconds to find out your source there is a conservative think tank funded by hedge fund, corporate and fossil fuel types with a vested interest.

Do better.

 

[Royces Hart]

90% of things including glitches on mainstream information channels favor Democrats and actively takes positions against Republicans.

Bezos' Washington Post article is spot on in the sense this style of reporting has reduced the credibility of these publications to the point social media like X has well and truly taken over in engagement metrics for how people get their news

I suppose the democrat cope is that "but but Trump is all bad, and Kamala is only good, maybe if you operated based on facts you'd see this!"


View attachment 2155331

Say stupid, offensive shit, get negative coverage.

Seems pretty straightforward.

 

[100action]

Nice meme. 85% Trump in the first sentence = 31% Trump in the next sentence.

Numbers aren't really your thing, are they?

Coverage of Trump, Harris in presidential race 'most lopsided in history,' 85% negative for Trump: report

ABC, CBS and NBC News have treated Kamala Harris to glowing media coverage since July while attacking Trump in 85% of their coverage of the presidential race in the same time frame.

www.foxnews.com

negative coverage =/= reporting on controversies. These are two different metrics!

Looks like neither reading comprehension or numbers is your thing

 

[Blue1980]

It's too big to rig by now I daresay. After the garbage truck troll and the Aldrin endorsement, it's hard to see Trump winning less than 400 EC votes!

Put some cash on California and New York going red?

 

[Dirty_banchez]

Trump supporters getting desperate. Thanks for the easy money ya Jabronies.

 

[Gough]

Say stupid, offensive shit, get negative coverage.

Seems pretty straightforward.

Trump thrives on negative coverage, it feeds his victimisation complex and it lets his supporters denounce it all as a some sort of media conspiracy.

 

[blackshadow]

Coverage of Trump, Harris in presidential race 'most lopsided in history,' 85% negative for Trump: report

ABC, CBS and NBC News have treated Kamala Harris to glowing media coverage since July while attacking Trump in 85% of their coverage of the presidential race in the same time frame.

www.foxnews.com

negative coverage =/= reporting on controversies. These are two different metrics!

Looks like neither reading comprehension nor numbers is your thing

Citing Fox News as a credible source shows how out of touch with reality you are.

 

[Blue1980]

-------


Apologies if already posted but how long until we get the "I always preferred Sly!"

I’m going to burn my dvd of Junior in protest