USA 2024 US Presidential Election: Trump vs Harris

[Chief]

 

[Aristotle Pickett]

Lol Peta Crudlin

It’s JD Vance, not the Veep, who’s the real deal
JD Vance, who could so easily have fallen into victimhood, is potentially far more totemic than Donald Trump because his life testifies that America can still be the land of the free and the home of the brave.

PETA CREDLIN

 

[Satan]

Mmmmm.

me thinks the Swifties have this. Doing voting friendship bracelets.Tour dates are

https://www.taylorswift.com/tour-us/

The ultimate single cat lady.

Seems she is not performing election day .if she did many thousands of 18 plus wouldnt vote in person . ( not forgetting a lot of the audience come from other states)

 

[iBeng]

And a fetish for dolphins it seems too:

Boy do I have a deal for him...

 

[Aristotle Pickett]

This JD Vance sure has the 18 to 24 white male vote wrapped up. What an asset.

 

[_Cerberus_]

This JD Vance sure has the 18 to 24 white male vote wrapped up. What an asset.

No surprise when most of the same bracket worship a piece of trash like Andrew Tate.

 

[Jamolad]

There are not enough people that call out when Trump and others refer to Obama as "Barack Hussein Obama".

I mean we know what the intention is there right?

Yep. Never understood why they refer to Trump as Donald J Trump, why they just use his middle initial rather than his middle name: Donald Jaundice Trump

 

[Rob R]

This JD Vance sure has the 18 to 24 white male vote wrapped up. What an asset.

Can't see the uni students voting for him, if anything it will encourage them to get out and vote for Harris

On SM-A125F using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[carltonchelsea]

Good for them I reckon.

You have two choices, I could extend my hand to help pull you up and out of that hole, or I could throw you a shovel, I believe you’d like the shovel!
Good luck with that!

 

[10571z]

Can Harris impact the swing states?

Sure the Libs are frothing at having a nominee that can actually remember what planet they are from. But the electoral role system means that only means so much.

 

[Ghost Patrol]

Can Harris impact the swing states?

Sure the Libs are frothing at having a nominee that can actually remember what planet they are from. But the electoral role system means that only means so much.

The swing states that Biden won?

It's Trump that needs to impact them. Not sure if he can do it by playing the perpetual victim.

Let's face it, Trump is a one trick pony.

 

[Spearman]

There are a few huge positives for America.

The Swifties are engaging in politics.tick.
The Swifties will vote. tic.

Not exactly what RNC want though.

DJ said yesterday he doesnt need people to vote as he has plenty.

uh huh.

Red state GOPs will pass laws stating iPhone playlists will be checked before allowing registration for voting in elections.

 

[tandino]

You have two choices, I could extend my hand to help pull you up and out of that hole, or I could throw you a shovel, I believe you’d like the shovel!
Good luck with that!

Oh don't worry, I stand by what I said.

 

[Spearman]

Claims they are being taken out of context.

But can’t provide the context.

This pretty much all Fox, Sinclair, Newsmax and other conservative media do; never back up their takes with facts or evidence.

 

[GreyCrow]

Can Harris impact the swing states?

Sure the Libs are frothing at having a nominee that can actually remember what planet they are from. But the electoral role system means that only means so much.

Libs

 

[iBeng]

How does he keep saying the quiet parts out loud lol

 

[happy_eagle]

How does he keep saying the quiet parts out loud lol

So he's either saying

1. In 4 years they won't have elections
or
2. He'll do such a good job in his 4 years, that it won't matter who you vote for after that, the country will be that cool and awesome. Plus he won't care who people vote for if he's not running (selfish).

Given his level of narcissism, I'm going to say he was angling at option 2.

 

[TheSunGod]

How does he keep saying the quiet parts out loud lol

 

[GreyCrow]

So he's either saying

1. In 4 years they won't have elections
or
2. He'll do such a good job in his 4 years, that it won't matter who you vote for after that, the country will be that cool and awesome. Plus he won't care who people vote for if he's not running (selfish).

Given his level of narcissism, I'm going to say he was angling at option 2.

Its not a good soundbite and given his history maybe he said what he was thinking

But

3. This is the most important election you face so we need you to vote now - even if you have never voted before or will again this is the one

It could be interpreted - with the non-compulsory voting laws - that he is urging people to get out this time. Sure there is a whole lot of Me Me Me in his words - because he wont care in 4 years - but I can see a path where it is all about him and now

 

[GreyCrow]

Its a very similar message the Dems put out 4 years ago to build a groundswell against Trump

 

[magpie_marty]

So he's either saying

1. In 4 years they won't have elections
or
2. He'll do such a good job in his 4 years, that it won't matter who you vote for after that, the country will be that cool and awesome. Plus he won't care who people vote for if he's not running (selfish).

Given his level of narcissism, I'm going to say he was angling at option 2.

Trump Tells Christians They Won't Have to Vote in Future: 'We'll Have It Fixed'

Donald Trump told a crowd gathered in West Palm Beach on Friday that if elected for a second term, they “won’t have to vote anymore.”

www.rollingstone.com

Keep in mind this is a speech from Turning Point a very far right place- Charlie Kirk makes a fortune,I have no doubt he will run for a political position in the future.

 

[TheSunGod]

So he's either saying

1. In 4 years they won't have elections
or
2. He'll do such a good job in his 4 years, that it won't matter who you vote for after that, the country will be that cool and awesome. Plus he won't care who people vote for if he's not running (selfish).

Given his level of narcissism, I'm going to say he was angling at option 2.

Option 2. If wrong see option 1.

 

[swingdog]

So he's either saying

1. In 4 years they won't have elections
or
2. He'll do such a good job in his 4 years, that it won't matter who you vote for after that, the country will be that cool and awesome. Plus he won't care who people vote for if he's not running (selfish).

Given his level of narcissism, I'm going to say he was angling at option 2.

The interpretation of this is another example of the lingering power of old norms.

Traditional thinking would say he misspoke and he meant that this election is consequential and everything would be fixed in another Trump term so the next election is less consequential.

New thinking would take into account everything about Trump (e.g. Jan 6, Project 2025, just about every action or word) and say he means Option 1.

We still haven't learned to take him at his word because we're still adopting traditional thinking. People have continued to do this for the past 8 years as he has broken through every norm he can. It's real frog in boiling water stuff.

 

[Dazzler9]

He clearly means he will tear down democratic elections if he wins. There is no other interpretation.

 

[Financialpanther]

He clearly means he will tear down democratic elections if he wins. There is no other interpretation.

I have one other interpretation which he is a complete moron that yabbers without coherent thought or consideration of consequences for his ramblings whilst he holds court

 

[Dazzler9]

I have one other interpretation which he is a complete moron that yabbers without coherent thought or consideration of consequences for his ramblings whilst he holds court

lol, true. And that's the GENEROUS interpretation!