USA 2024 US Presidential Election: Trump vs Harris

[Chief]

 

[Satan]

As President, Trump Demanded Investigations of Foes. He Often Got Them.

He has threatened to target his perceived enemies if elected again. A look at his time in the White House shows how readily he could do so.

www.nytimes.com

No doubt he would go after others if back in power

 

[iBeng]

Could you imagine the manufactured outrage if she started selling coins and sneakers?

"MY OPPONENT, COMMIE MAXIST SOCIALIST KAM'BALA'MALA IS TRYING TO GRIFT HER OWN SUPPORTER BASE WITH HER FACE ON A WORTHLESS COIN, A COIN YOU CANT EVEN USE, THAT IS WHAT THE SOCIALIST AGENDA WANTS! STOP THE GRIFT, MAKE AMERICA GREAT NOT GRIFT AGAIN! HELP US FIGHT THIS SCOURGE BY PURCHASING MY LIMITED EDITION AND PRICLESS NFT TRADING CARDS, BIBLE, TYRE RIMS, TRUMP TOILET PAPER FREEDOM WIPES AND MORE AT TRUMPAGAINSTGRIFTING.COM!"

 

[Saint Shags]

You're full of rubbish

Guns per se are not an issue.

Gun law reform is the issue.

Responsible gun ownership has never been the issue.

The types of weapons available, the ease of access and the unaccountability of where guns are stored and carried would be.

 

[Aristotle Pickett]

Guns per se are not an issue.

Gun law reform is the issue.

Responsible gun ownership has never been the issue.

The types of weapons available, the ease of access and the unaccountability of where guns are stored and carried would be.

Not all democrats like or have guns.

 

[Saint Shags]

Not all democrats like or have guns.

No but if you were to survey Democrats. The most pressing issue would not be banning all guns.

It's the type of weapons available and the accessibility of those high powered weapons.

What Democrat voters want is gun reform that gets the high powered guns out of the public as best as possible. That ship has sailed too far already I fear.

 

[FireKrakouer]

As President, Trump Demanded Investigations of Foes. He Often Got Them.

He has threatened to target his perceived enemies if elected again. A look at his time in the White House shows how readily he could do so.

www.nytimes.com

No doubt he would go after others if back in power

Well m8 he served a full term without weaponising lawfare, something we can't say for the Biden / Harris admin. If we're concerned about using the justice system against political rivals, the evidence so far is clear which party we should direct that concern at. As the NPC saying goes, "every accusation is a confession"!

 

[Aristotle Pickett]

No but if you were to survey Democrats. The most pressing issue would not be banning all guns.

It's the type of weapons available and the accessibility of those high powered weapons.

What Democrat voters want is gun reform that gets the high powered guns out of the public as best as possible. That ship has sailed too far already I fear.

True , but Kamala isn't exactly inspiring her base with that and other issues. She is relying mainly on the anti-trump vote .

 

[The Sultan]

"MY OPPONENT, COMMIE MAXIST SOCIALIST KAM'BALA'MALA IS TRYING TO GRIFT HER OWN SUPPORTER BASE WITH HER FACE ON A WORTHLESS COIN, A COIN YOU CANT EVEN USE, THAT IS WHAT THE SOCIALIST AGENDA WANTS! STOP THE GRIFT, MAKE AMERICA GREAT NOT GRIFT AGAIN! HELP US FIGHT THIS SCOURGE BY PURCHASING MY LIMITED EDITION AND PRICLESS NFT TRADING CARDS, BIBLE, TYRE RIMS, TRUMP TOILET PAPER FREEDOM WIPES AND MORE AT TRUMPAGAINSTGRIFTING.COM!"

I legit thought that was a real drump post

 

[Blue1980]

You're full of rubbish

It’s more that the vast majority want background checks and people on no fly lists to not get guns. Stuff republicans are against.

 

[big_e]

An American politician saying they are a gun owner is equivalent to an Australian one borrowing an Akubra and meeting a farmer. Just another tick a box exercise, all in the name of avoiding silly headlines from media outlets and nonsense questions from tabloid reporters.

 

[Gethelred]

Yes it was. Open your ears.

Is there a possibility that an interview on Oprah is speaking to an audience you are not a part of?

I don't get Oprah, and I never have. I don't understand the appeal of super softball interviewing, the cloying nature of it. I don't find interviews all that interesting unless they're adversarial in nature, and not the faux adversarial that you find on Australian TV. I'm talking Mike Sheahan and Mark Jackson adversarial.

But just because I don't get it doesn't mean it's valueless. It might just not be for me. Is there a chance that that interview is just not for you, that what you're seeing as word salad is simply speaking to groups you aren't a part of?

 

[Gough]

Is there a possibility that an interview on Oprah is speaking to an audience you are not a part of?

I don't get Oprah, and I never have. I don't understand the appeal of super softball interviewing, the cloying nature of it. I don't find interviews all that interesting unless they're adversarial in nature, and not the faux adversarial that you find on Australian TV. I'm talking Mike Sheahan and Mark Jackson adversarial.

But just because I don't get it doesn't mean it's valueless. It might just not be for me. Is there a chance that that interview is just not for you, that what you're seeing as word salad is simply speaking to groups you aren't a part of?

I'm with you on Oprah, chicks talking about wellness generally has me reaching for my cigarette lighter. That's how you keep your weight down.

 

[adogsfan5]

Is there a possibility that an interview on Oprah is speaking to an audience you are not a part of?

I don't get Oprah, and I never have. I don't understand the appeal of super softball interviewing, the cloying nature of it. I don't find interviews all that interesting unless they're adversarial in nature, and not the faux adversarial that you find on Australian TV. I'm talking Mike Sheahan and Mark Jackson adversarial.

But just because I don't get it doesn't mean it's valueless. It might just not be for me. Is there a chance that that interview is just not for you, that what you're seeing as word salad is simply speaking to groups you aren't a part of?

Firstly, thank you for a regular / calm / genuine reply.

You are probably correct. Perhaps I was looking for quick, fast, straight to the point political answers and maybe that wasn’t the correct platform for it. I think you raise a fair point.

 

[Randomizor]

Well m8 he served a full term without weaponising lawfare, something we can't say for the Biden / Harris admin. If we're concerned about using the justice system against political rivals, the evidence so far is clear which party we should direct that concern at. As the NPC saying goes, "every accusation is a confession"!

Alternatively: maybe Trump should just stop committing crimes?

 

[FireKrakouer]

Alternatively: maybe Trump should just stop committing crimes?

What, like a total square? Next you'll be saying rappers shouldn't commit crimes... it's part of the appeal m8.

 

[iBeng]

What, like a total square? Next you'll be saying rappers shouldn't commit crimes... it's part of the appeal m8.

He needs to grow some balls and shoot someone in Times Square. I want to see his hypothetical statement put into action.

 

[Financialpanther]

What, like a total square? Next you'll be saying rappers shouldn't commit crimes... it's part of the appeal m8.

K but Diddy...

 

[magpie_marty]

You have NFI.

Even Dems in America love guns, especially ones in the key swing states. And the ones who don't are not changing their vote because of it.

Four dead and dozens hurt in Alabama mass shooting

Police say multiple gunmen fired on a group of people outside on a street in the city of Birmingham.

www.bbc.com

 

[magpie_marty]

Guns per se are not an issue.

Gun law reform is the issue.

Responsible gun ownership has never been the issue.

The types of weapons available, the ease of access and the unaccountability of where guns are stored and carried would be.

Four dead and dozens hurt in Alabama mass shooting

Police say multiple gunmen fired on a group of people outside on a street in the city of Birmingham.

www.bbc.com