Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Sydney v Brisbane Lions - 2:30PM AEST Sat
Squiggle tips Lions at 61% chance -- What's your tip? -- Ticketing Buy, Sell -- Teams on Thurs »
AFLW 2024 - Round 4 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Could you imagine the manufactured outrage if she started selling coins and sneakers?
You're full of rubbish
Not all democrats like or have guns.Guns per se are not an issue.
Gun law reform is the issue.
Responsible gun ownership has never been the issue.
The types of weapons available, the ease of access and the unaccountability of where guns are stored and carried would be.
No but if you were to survey Democrats. The most pressing issue would not be banning all guns.Not all democrats like or have guns.
Well m8 he served a full term without weaponising lawfare, something we can't say for the Biden / Harris admin. If we're concerned about using the justice system against political rivals, the evidence so far is clear which party we should direct that concern at. As the NPC saying goes, "every accusation is a confession"!As President, Trump Demanded Investigations of Foes. He Often Got Them.
He has threatened to target his perceived enemies if elected again. A look at his time in the White House shows how readily he could do so.www.nytimes.com
No doubt he would go after others if back in power
True , but Kamala isn't exactly inspiring her base with that and other issues. She is relying mainly on the anti-trump vote .No but if you were to survey Democrats. The most pressing issue would not be banning all guns.
It's the type of weapons available and the accessibility of those high powered weapons.
What Democrat voters want is gun reform that gets the high powered guns out of the public as best as possible. That ship has sailed too far already I fear.
I legit thought that was a real drump post"MY OPPONENT, COMMIE MAXIST SOCIALIST KAM'BALA'MALA IS TRYING TO GRIFT HER OWN SUPPORTER BASE WITH HER FACE ON A WORTHLESS COIN, A COIN YOU CANT EVEN USE, THAT IS WHAT THE SOCIALIST AGENDA WANTS! STOP THE GRIFT, MAKE AMERICA GREAT NOT GRIFT AGAIN! HELP US FIGHT THIS SCOURGE BY PURCHASING MY LIMITED EDITION AND PRICLESS NFT TRADING CARDS, BIBLE, TYRE RIMS, TRUMP TOILET PAPER FREEDOM WIPES AND MORE AT TRUMPAGAINSTGRIFTING.COM!"
You're full of rubbish
Is there a possibility that an interview on Oprah is speaking to an audience you are not a part of?Yes it was. Open your ears.
I'm with you on Oprah, chicks talking about wellness generally has me reaching for my cigarette lighter. That's how you keep your weight down.Is there a possibility that an interview on Oprah is speaking to an audience you are not a part of?
I don't get Oprah, and I never have. I don't understand the appeal of super softball interviewing, the cloying nature of it. I don't find interviews all that interesting unless they're adversarial in nature, and not the faux adversarial that you find on Australian TV. I'm talking Mike Sheahan and Mark Jackson adversarial.
But just because I don't get it doesn't mean it's valueless. It might just not be for me. Is there a chance that that interview is just not for you, that what you're seeing as word salad is simply speaking to groups you aren't a part of?
Is there a possibility that an interview on Oprah is speaking to an audience you are not a part of?
I don't get Oprah, and I never have. I don't understand the appeal of super softball interviewing, the cloying nature of it. I don't find interviews all that interesting unless they're adversarial in nature, and not the faux adversarial that you find on Australian TV. I'm talking Mike Sheahan and Mark Jackson adversarial.
But just because I don't get it doesn't mean it's valueless. It might just not be for me. Is there a chance that that interview is just not for you, that what you're seeing as word salad is simply speaking to groups you aren't a part of?
Alternatively: maybe Trump should just stop committing crimes?Well m8 he served a full term without weaponising lawfare, something we can't say for the Biden / Harris admin. If we're concerned about using the justice system against political rivals, the evidence so far is clear which party we should direct that concern at. As the NPC saying goes, "every accusation is a confession"!
What, like a total square? Next you'll be saying rappers shouldn't commit crimes... it's part of the appeal m8.Alternatively: maybe Trump should just stop committing crimes?
What, like a total square? Next you'll be saying rappers shouldn't commit crimes... it's part of the appeal m8.
K but Diddy...What, like a total square? Next you'll be saying rappers shouldn't commit crimes... it's part of the appeal m8.
You have NFI.
Even Dems in America love guns, especially ones in the key swing states. And the ones who don't are not changing their vote because of it.
Guns per se are not an issue.
Gun law reform is the issue.
Responsible gun ownership has never been the issue.
The types of weapons available, the ease of access and the unaccountability of where guns are stored and carried would be.
Well as comedian GOAT Dave Chappelle pointed out, you can fatally shoot a 19 year old black american in a Walmart and not get cancelled, but "you better not hurt a gay person's feelings" (in reference to rapper DaBaby gunning someone down and getting off scot free but then having his career cancelled over homophobic comments).He needs to grow some balls and shoot someone in Times Square. I want to see his hypothetical statement put into action.
Any thoughts on Mark Robinson?Well as comedian GOAT Dave Chappelle pointed out, you can fatally shoot a 19 year old black american in a Walmart and not get cancelled, but "you better not hurt a gay person's feelings" (in reference to rapper DaBaby gunning someone down and getting off scot free but then having his career cancelled over homophobic comments).
America's moral priorities are all over the shop m8.