- Sep 28, 2015
- 429
- 763
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
Did some nice stuff. Seems to have good hands!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I have massive concerns about using our first pick on a mid that doesn’t accumulate the footy, has iffy foot skills, and struggles to impact games at the top level.
Who would that be?
It's highly likely we'll be trading our 1st pick mate.
You Idiots. Thomas wasn't carrying. He was in Tip Top Condition and played like a 4th Round Pick. :stern look
I guess my contention is that if hadn’t had a north connection previously we wouldn’t be bringing him up at all for our first.
I feel we have been biased by previous info and some very good form at lower levels.
Trading our first has become far less likely after the champs imo.
Depending on final position, I think if we end up with a top 10 pick, we are risking taking it to the draft.
We need a social media campaign to discuss how bad TT is. Slide son, slide!
Grain of salt.A bit from KM on the draft board:
I have strong opinions on Thomas.
What I love and what coaches will love is his work defensively without the ball - not only tackling but smothering everything - it feels like he gets 2-3 smothers every game on top of 6-8 tackles.
He's otherwise someone with the attributes and he can win the contested ball.
Offensively is where I have issue with Thomas and why I don't believe he'll be someone we look back on as a best 10 player from this draft. Unlike a Sydney Stack or Collier-Dawkins who win the ball at stoppages at speed on the move and accelerate away through traffic, it's a lot of stationary ball winning from Thomas and as a result you don't see him opening up games. On the outside he doesn't find a whole lot of it, and I haven't found him breaking the lines or opening the game up with his kicking in any capacity throughout the carnival.
As a result, my view is Thomas is absurdly overrated. He's someone around pick 10-15 is suitable to place a bid on, but anything earlier and clubs in my view would be making a mistake.
I'm not even certain where I'd want him playing. His work a couple of years back running off half-back was probably the best I've seen him play, and I think he needs that kind of space in front of him to run onto to make use of those gifts more so than playing through the middle.
-------
There seems to be a generally accepted top 8 at the moment in club circles.
Taking no consideration into club needs/who would have the pick at years end. The rough feel at the moment is:
1. Lukosius
2. Walsh
3. M.King
4. B.King
5. Blakey
6. T.Thomas
7. B.Smith
8. Rankine
----------
Adelaide poster Cleric post :
Have you listened to the road to the draft podcast with Hamish O from Adelaide? Was talking about Thomas (called him triple T) and said they have followed him for years due to his Tasmanian contacts and rates him a top 10 pick, also said they will place bids to keep clubs honest. So I could see the Crows bidding on Thomas with our first pick.
KM:
Can't say I've tuned into any podcasts.
T.Thomas has been on the draft radar for a number of years now - two years ago starring for Tasmania and looking like their best prospect even then.
The expectation is a bid will come inside the first 8, maybe first 5 for Thomas.
KM:
For the record, Rankine I view as clearly better than Thomas. I don't feel they should be in the same conversation.
With that said, a lot of recruiters still view Thomas a top 3 prospect. He's still high on a lot of draft boards. Much higher than I would be willing to place him.
I kind of feel the same way.
If you had to guess Pykie what do you think Thomas 20m time would be? Sub 3 secs?
I kind of feel the same way.
If you had to guess Pykie what do you think Thomas 20m time would be? Sub 3 secs?
Trading our first has become far less likely after the champs imo.
Depending on final position, I think if we end up with a top 10 pick, we are risking taking it to the draft.
Grain of salt.
KM is a moron.
I have massive concerns about using our first pick on a mid that doesn’t accumulate the footy, has iffy foot skills, and struggles to impact games at the top level.
Grain of salt.
KM is a moron.