Player Watch #27: Miller Bergman - BFNAAK - Extends to end of 2025 - returns to the team against the Eagles

[King Corey]

Talented but 4th year in the system and he's projecting as a skinny Scott McMahon without the ability to go forward or accumulate.

But he does have nice skills and vision in and of themselves a la McMahon.

 

[Devington]

If he can't step up now then he will be the Will Phillips of next year's list. Enough talent to want to retain, but too much time on a list without resolving deficiencies or question marks.

 

[chubbspeterson]

An we do a swap with his brother at Port?

He's a poor kick. Not sure why DuckYeah liked the idea.

 

[perplexed]

Yeah, I think he's done. He hasn't been able to bulk up at all and doesn't have the innate knack of accumulation. Then there are the other flankers coming on. Leaves him in no man's land.

Hugely disappointing 180 from my hopes he'd break out as a full-time member of the back six. If he picks it up somehow, I'll be delighted. Love the way he kicks it

Yep. Is he concentrating too much on defense or does he just not know how to find the ball? Not much point having good disposal if you can't get a kick.

 

[northbergs]

[emoji[emoji6][emoji6]][emoji[emoji6][emoji6]][emoji[emoji6]][emoji6]" data-quote="Makeshift Park" data-source="post: 0" class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--expandable bbCodeBlock--quote js-expandWatch">

Agree there have been the odd favourable signs there, but as it stands this is the list of OOC players this year, and at this juncture there's only about I'd draw a line through before I get to his name.

I know this is the Miller Bergman thread, but Luke Parker shouldn’t be on that list.


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

 

[DocSholl]

Mate we can't afford to keep blokes on the list for another two years if they're not showing much.

So far all he has shown is a couple of decent kicks and an inability to physically compete.

It's the Flynn Perez effect. A bloke does 2-3 good things in his first couple of games and we cling onto them forever.

 

[chubbspeterson]

Yeah, I think he's done. He hasn't been able to bulk up at all and doesn't have the innate knack of accumulation. Then there are the other flankers coming on. Leaves him in no man's land.

Hugely disappointing 180 from my hopes he'd break out as a full-time member of the back six. If he picks it up somehow, I'll be delighted. Love the way he kicks it

Looked like he had bigger shoulders watching him live, but whether it's enough muscle we'll see.
Definitely uses the ball well but but not as athletic as Hardemann, so it'll be an interesting HBF selection battle.

 

[Horizons_00]

Talented but 4th year in the system and he's projecting as a skinny Scott McMahon without the ability to go forward or accumulate.

But he does have nice skills and vision in and of themselves a la McMahon.

Way too injury prone too. Too much of a twig to play at the AFL level IMO

 

[King Corey]

Mate we can't afford to keep blokes on the list for another two years if they're not showing much.

So far all he has shown is a couple of decent kicks and an inability to physically compete.

He has been on an AFL list for 3 years. That's a long time to transform your body.

I rate some of his attributes but he needs a blinder of a year to climb the pecking order in his position, IMO. Not completely unachievable but he's up against it.

Another comparison - Trent Rivers.

Skillful skinny backmen taken in a similar draft range in their respective draft years.

Rivers bulked up and brought it to AFL. Bergman for whatever reason hasn't been able to fortify his body to a suitable level as yet.

 

[chubbspeterson]

It's the Flynn Perez effect. A bloke does 2-3 good things in his first couple of games and we cling onto them forever.

So just assume all our young players are no good? That's the spirit.

 

[chubbspeterson]

Another comparison - Trent Rivers.

Skillful skinny backmen taken in a similar draft range in their respective draft years.

Rivers bulked up and brought it to AFL. Bergman for whatever reason hasn't been able to fortify his body to a suitable level as yet.

Close but Rivers is more athletic from what I've seen. I think we picked Mahony didn't we back then lol?

 

[LB2Snake]

Close but Rivers is more athletic from what I've seen. I think we picked Mahony didn't we back then lol?

Think Rivers was part of what they turned our pick 8 into wasn't he.....Pickett and Rivers I thought.

 

[chubbspeterson]

Think Rivers was part of what they turned our pick 8 into wasn't he.....Pickett and Rivers I thought.

Yep you are right. Pick 8 was 10 (12) (Pickett) and 28 (32) (Rivers) and F4 or something.
Sorry I was wrong we took Comben pick 31 before Rivers was pick 32, that's fine with me.
Mahony 34 and Perez 35.

 

[LB2Snake]

Yep you are right. Pick 8 was 10 (12) (Pickett) and 28 (32) (Rivers) and F4 or something.
Sorry I was wrong we took Comben pick 31 before Rivers was pick 32, that's fine with me.
Mahony 34 and Perez 35.

Rivers is a pretty good player. What about Chad Warner at 39? Not bad