Reckon Narkle as the sub. Shown he can come on and win clearances as the opposition mids are tiring.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Feel like I trust Simpson way more than some on here. He performs every time he steps over the line. He's going to be a Mr. Reliable down the line. I'd rather his youth, speed and endeavour as opposed to having Higgins in the team. The pressure will ratchet up now finals are here. We need to be careful with how many 30+ blokes we have in the team.
More speed of mind than Higgins, surely?Not sure you’d have Simpson in for his “speed”. He’s very one paced. Good skills and good decision maker? yes, but quick? no.
Played his best footy a couple of years back maybe 3 coming off the back of the square at centre bounces a real weapon.When the list of best kicks/highest kicking efficiency came out earlier this season, pretty sure he was one of only 2 non defenders in the top 30
If that's due to poor decision making out of defence, then I'm happy to see more of that poor decision making
That’s not a ringing endorsement in Scott speak at all.. it’s going to be a tight call. I’d prefer Simpson"haven't decided on our 22, but he'd be likely" - that's the quote when asked if Higgins is a walk up start to the 22.
So you'd guess so
I like Simpson, but who in their right mind could ever pick him ahead of Higgins?
View attachment 1216518
Higgins was a gun, might have slowed down but is a class above Simpson, and it will show in the finals.More speed of mind than Higgins, surely?
More speed of mind than Higgins, surely?
Higgins was a gun, might have slowed down but is a class above Simpson, and it will show in the finals.
This has to be satire.
Not sure what to make of Higgins? He’s still got that bit of class but he’s clearly not the player he was. His lack of a defensive game is a concern.
I kinda don't think it is an either/or with Duncan in terms of whether he is back half or further up the ground. The important thing is that he's gets it more in space and time through the corridor than out on the wings. Make that happen and he'll be damaging whether it's coming out of defence or heading inside 50.Staggering to think that you could be genuinely worried about Duncan's ball use out of defence, when you compare him to the other options back there at the moment. He would have all of the current options covered in his sleep for his ability to choose the right pass and then execute it successfully on a regular basis.
I hope we don't use him back there, as his ball use going inside 50 is so damaging. But, if we do decide to use him out of the back half, I will be far less worried every time he has the footy than I will with any other player who will spend significant time back there. His elite disposal by foot up against so many others who are average at best would straighten us up, if anything.
Atkins or BewsHiggins and Duncan in for Simpson and Holmes. Who comes out for Tuohy?
It is but his experience and ability to make the right decision under pressure in big games is what we bought him for (and at times he has shown it this year). Hopefully he brings that this week.
Geez that's rough. How did we fit all 3 and stewart in earlier in the year?Atkins or Bews
Higgins experience and bigger build will be the key thing that’ll keep him ahead of Holmes who I can see being the sub in the finalsOf course higgins will play.
The more relevant comparison for sam is to close and holmes as one of those three wont play.
Too bad Clarke hasn't quite made it yet, he has serious speed.Not sure you’d have Simpson in for his “speed”. He’s very one paced. Good skills and good decision maker? yes, but quick? no.
Higgins and Duncan in for Simpson and Holmes. Who comes out for Tuohy?
Too bad Clarke hasn't quite made it yet, he has serious speed.
Like the idea of Duncan at HB - vision and foot setting up moves - play reading, smarts and not bad overhead so might be able to hold his own. Would need right match up and time in middle and lots of time on bench.You'd think
IN: Higgins, Duncan
OUT: Simpson, Holmes
you can make an argument for keeping both of those guys in, but they are the fringe players that have been filling the most similar roles to the two ins.
Simpson has played the same role that Higgins has been doing all year as a half forward rahter than a genuine small. So, you'd guess he will make way before Close for example. Although they may decide they only need 2 out of Miers, Close, Dahl, in which case he may keep his spot.
Similarly, It was good to see Holmes get some midfield and centre bounce time on Saturday, but he seems the obvious person to make way for Duncan as his role will be similar. Unless they want Duncan playing of half back to cover Stewart perhaps.