AFL Player # 3: Darcy Parish

Remove this Banner Ad

I think Gerard is being a little harsh.
i think it's harsh but at the same time i don't think it's unfounded.

how many players get offered contracts that high, and how many actually deserve it?
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Darcy is a talented player, but he just part of the midfield mix problem.
Darcy and Merret should be stamping their authority with their exceptional AA worthy abilities in the centre. But going by the last few months it's so apparent it just doesn't work. These aren't young up and coming players anymore. Regardless if oppo teams have figured our wider gameplan out.

Trade him, get another Setterfield clone and move on.
 
Ice Cube Friday GIF
 
I am reminded of Mark Mercuri every time we put someone on a 5 year contract.
 
Bailey Smith?
He's not currently in the top 100 highest paid, he's still a Bulldog, and I haven't seen any reports about how much the Cats would pay him to suggest they're throwing ridiculous money at him.

Based off their history, they would probably get him for less than the Dogs or other suitors would have to pay him because of the change in lifestyle and their proven football program. I don't think they'll be paying him anything close to the 800k+ bracket that Danger and JCam have been.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

He's not currently in the top 100 highest paid, he's still a Bulldog, and I haven't seen any reports about how much the Cats would pay him to suggest they're throwing ridiculous money at him.

Based off their history, they would probably get him for less than the Dogs or other suitors would have to pay him because of the change in lifestyle and their proven football program. I don't think they'll be paying him anything close to the 800k+ bracket that Danger and JCam have been.
I wonder whether Bailey Smith might be a better option. They look a bit slow.
 
So we don't want to give Parish a big contract because he's not that good, but we need another club to give him a big contract for some reason so we can get a top 10 compo pick that Dodo/RFK will just waste, and we can improve our midfield mix by replacing Parish (an inside mid who can't kick) with Hobbs (an inside mid who can't kick, but is young).
 
i think it's harsh but at the same time i don't think it's unfounded.

how many players get offered contracts that high, and how many actually deserve it?

He is being harsh, but it's also a fair question - what's better for the club right now: Parish as our highest paid player for the next half a decade, or a high draft pick as compo for him leaving?
I largely agree, but I think Parish is a little better than Gerard is giving him credit for.
 
He's not currently in the top 100 highest paid, he's still a Bulldog, and I haven't seen any reports about how much the Cats would pay him to suggest they're throwing ridiculous money at him.

Based off their history, they would probably get him for less than the Dogs or other suitors would have to pay him because of the change in lifestyle and their proven football program. I don't think they'll be paying him anything close to the 800k+ bracket that Danger and JCam have been.

Probably a favourable land deal or two to help ease the financial shortfall they’ve incurred.
 
So we don't want to give Parish a big contract because he's not that good, but we need another club to give him a big contract for some reason so we can get a top 10 compo pick that Dodo/RFK will just waste, and we can improve our midfield mix by replacing Parish (an inside mid who can't kick) with Hobbs (an inside mid who can't kick, but is young).

$700k or so for 5 years isn’t exactly peanuts
 

Remove this Banner Ad

AFL Player # 3: Darcy Parish

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top