shintemaster
Brownlow Medallist
This guy AFL's.If Wardlaw wins the AFL will change the rules.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This guy AFL's.If Wardlaw wins the AFL will change the rules.
He was today.Is George (Brayden) still lining up in defence?
He was today.
Sent from my SM-A908B using Tapatalk
Is that you Alanis?Ironically the three years before that. Carlton, Collingwood and Essendon had a player that won it
I hope Brayden goes on to play 200 games, but I think we need to be cautious in seeking deliverance before he’s played oneWith Goater going down and Fisher looking incredibly suspect would love to bring Brayden into the team. Would offer that hard competitive edge that were crying out for.
wouldn't a tennis ball be harder to mark??From the training highlights I have seen of Brayden - he’s got a great set of mits.
Marks the ball like it a tennis ball.
wouldn't a tennis ball be harder to mark??
Brayden is closer to 190. Much bigger body than Sheezel, McKercher and Fisher. We'd be looking to play him in the McDonald/Goater role.I still can’t understand why the number 26 we drafted as a ‘damaging forward’ is playing out of defence?
Is it to get better with ball movement/grow confidence?
Is it because he has assets better suited for the backline? Great mark and kick?
I don’t get it? We’ve got heaps of 180 cm types rolling through the back now. Same can be said with unproven 180cm developing in the forward line I guess
Could be Hurnesque IMO
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
His booming kick has been thrown forward as a reason. We know Clarko loves skill coming off HB.I still can’t understand why the number 26 we drafted as a ‘damaging forward’ is playing out of defence?
Is it to get better with ball movement/grow confidence?
Is it because he has assets better suited for the backline? Great mark and kick?
I don’t get it? We’ve got heaps of 180 cm types rolling through the back now. Same can be said with unproven 180cm developing in the forward line I guess
He's 186, and possesses power to boot. Comparison's just off, mateI still can’t understand why the number 26 we drafted as a ‘damaging forward’ is playing out of defence?
Is it to get better with ball movement/grow confidence?
Is it because he has assets better suited for the backline? Great mark and kick?
I don’t get it? We’ve got heaps of 180 cm types rolling through the back now. Same can be said with unproven 180cm developing in the forward line I guess
Could be Hurnesque IMO
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I don’t think it was though. Sure, I didn’t mean specifically bang on 180cm I think we’ve got one of those. I meant that range of players from McDonald, Bergman, Fisher to Sheezel etcHe's 186, and possesses power to boot. Comparison's just off, mate
I'd argue that we're more likely to sort out the medium forward spots than the medium defender-who-actually-defends spots. We need someone to fill in the hole in defence. Archer hasn't gotten a run at it consistently and LMac is an enigma. Why not trial a bloke who's gonna be fighting about five others for spots in his natural position down there?I don’t think it was though. Sure, I didn’t mean specifically bang on 180cm I think we’ve got one of those. I meant that range of players from McDonald, Bergman, Fisher to Sheezel etc
And even the forward line from Harvey to Curtis and Zuurhar. It’s just we have a similar range on both ends. I just would have thought we need the most urgent development in the forward half when focusing on these type of players