When he does have a good game i will be the first here to say he had a great game and applaud him for itMakes me wonder you dont want to see richmond improve
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 2 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
When he does have a good game i will be the first here to say he had a great game and applaud him for itMakes me wonder you dont want to see richmond improve
LOL stop with the crap deflectingBro, don’t be a gaslighting Kane Cornes
You really are sounding like a proper fwit atm
9/10 things Cumbo did tonight were of elite quality and if you can’t see that then no one will ever take u seriously againLOL stop with the crap deflecting
its a simple question what did he do that makes you think he had such a fantastic game
Careful mate, you'll be labelled a hater for not ignoring the areas he needs to work on.That's it mate, he does as much wrong - seriously wrong - as he does beautifully.
Waiting for the footy to come over the back in marking contests where they easily escape out the front because he didn't contest, allowing whoever played on him to become a spare man at will, repeat failures to lock the ball in, complete stranger to defensive running - just as you say, costly basics (and he was hardly alone there of course).
He's got talent to burn and I love watching him play, he's a born gun, but we already leak all the defensive things he leaks with other forwards and in the end the question becomes: how many of these 'boom or easy rebound bust' types can you afford to play across half forward, especially when you're already getting beaten all over the ground?
Jack leaks around the same level, as does Dusty on his worse games and they're all a like for like swap, but you can't play all of them unless you've got a dominant midfield and win enough contested ball to make up for all the times they'll be easily rebounded against.
Could literally say the same things about those who seem to ignore Noahs weaknesses when it's suggested that he needs to work to improve his game.Cumberland literally turned the game for us (like he has in past last year) and you will still find a negative. Unbelievable. Makes me wonder you dont want to see richmond improve
Please stop,……watch the game again.LOL stop with the crap deflecting
its a simple question what did he do that makes you think he had such a fantastic game
Problem is he only did 7 things and apart from the fresh legs advantage where he was quicker and more energetic than the rest as you would expect when the rest of the players had played in the wet for a half a game.9/10 things Cumbo did tonight were of elite quality and if you can’t see that then no one will ever take u seriously again
Problem is he only did 7 things and apart from the fresh legs advantage where he was quicker and more energetic than the rest as you would expect when the rest of the players had played in the wet for a half a game.
He was just ok nothing special mate
Do realise the selectors consist mostly of coaches etc which have probably (definitely) chnaged since 2020 so i would put too much blind faith in them. They can make mistakes which has been proven, just hope they learn from it. For example, ryan has been played 2/3 games in the wet, surely they could have learn from the first time it wasnt going to be a good idea - great they are trying have confidence in him but sometimes you can ruin confidence in the player instead.People melting but the match committee is not going to invent reasons to relegate a certain best 22 player. The good thing we see with Cumberland is he can win contests and burst clear with the ball and use it. At way under key position height, he is competing with marquee players Martin and Bolton for that type of role, and they are on the big money for very good reason, they have runs on the board. But a lot of other players could probably have a bigger impact ball in hand if they played as Cumberland does. Players like Maurice Jnr, Clarke, Graham and Mansell tonight were going on long chases following opponents who were involved in chains for 60-80m's then when their pressure helps cause a turnover they are spreading back our way. Of course when they get the ball they are not going to look like superman after those type of efforts.
Our selectors know what it takes to win flags.
Carmichael is a mid that came into the game late and was working in a bottle shop playing in a lower league in 2022I think Cumberland's performance is reflective of how he plays. Collingwood's sub Carmichael came on and did not have anywhere near the impact ball in hand. But I agree with you and others about Noah, it is clearly the not ball in hand bit that is the issue.
Do realise the selectors consist mostly of coaches etc which have probably (definitely) chnaged since 2020 so i would put too much blind faith in them. They can make mistakes which has been proven, just hope they learn from it. For example, ryan has been played 2/3 games in the wet, surely they could have learn from the first time it wasnt going to be a good idea - great they are trying have confidence in him but sometimes you can ruin confidence in the player instead.
I want ryan in the team. We were just too tall in the wet, just a poor decision when we had a chance to go smaller. Yes match selection is tricky, they have to bold rather than safe sometimes. This includes making some hard calls not just on the young players (which they are doing with cumberland) but with the senior players like cotch, jack, graham etc. Loyalty is great but it can also hold you back. For example, if they were that keen to keep ryan after his three goals, then you need to therefore make a bold call on jack or lynch in the wet. So obviously its not lynch, so thats when the match comittee comes in with hard decisions. I think they just took the easy route and played all three and ignored weather conditions and hoped for the best, the result in the first half was telling (and wasteful).I was surprised they played Ryan tonight to be honest. Not because he isn't up to AFL footy, but just team balance, especially in the conditions as you say.
But his playing isn't all loss. I think he did a fair stint late in the first half when we were in a holding pattern and stopped the Pies scoring. This I think allowed Nankervis to rest a bit, I presume forward and on the bench. Nankervis seemed to me to have quite a strong impact after HT as a result. Ryan gains crucial experience. If Soldo's foot doesn't improve well, Nankervis gets injured or suspended, Ryan will almost certainly be playing first ruck no matter what the conditions are. All these things have to be considered.
This is the thing about selection, decisions you make can impact beyond just the kicks marks and handballs a player gets. It is extremely difficult at present to figure out our best formation week to week. But it is only round 3. If they keep trying different things eventually things will become clearer.
I want ryan in the team. We were just too tall in the wet, just a poor decision when we had a chance to go smaller. Yes match selection is tricky, they have to bold rather than safe sometimes. This includes making some hard calls not just on the young players (which they are doing with cumberland) but with the senior players like cotch, jack, graham etc. Loyalty is great but it can also hold you back. For example, if they were that keen to keep ryan after his three goals, then you need to therefore make a bold call on jack or lynch in the wet. So obviously its not lynch, so thats when the match comittee comes in with hard decisions. I think they just took the easy route and played all three and ignored weather conditions and hoped for the best, the result in the first half was telling (and wasteful).
The other option is to leave nank out and ryan comes in - which may happen by the end of the year but most probably in the next 2 years.
He did much more than millionaire Lynch but keep dragging the guy down.Problem is he only did 7 things and apart from the fresh legs advantage where he was quicker and more energetic than the rest as you would expect when the rest of the players had played in the wet for a half a game.
He was just ok nothing special mate
People love dimma they reckon his a god as he was out coached once again hes stuffing around with players never ends. Collingwood should have been 70 points up at half time. Had it not been for baker and Balta this game could have been very ugly.Dimma is being to stubborn simple as that like I said he was our best medium forward last year by a mile his got skill ,class and does the pressure stuff and we get this bs his competing with Martin.Play your best players in there position no brainer.
People love dimma they reckon his a god as he was out coached once again hes stuffing around with players never ends. Collingwood should have been 70 points up at half time. Had it not been for baker and Balta this game could have been very ugly.
Agree (hides)Problem is he only did 7 things and apart from the fresh legs advantage where he was quicker and more energetic than the rest as you would expect when the rest of the players had played in the wet for a half a game.
He was just ok nothing special mate