42 seconds

Remove this Banner Ad

wagstaff

Norm Smith Medallist
Nov 28, 2001
5,490
4,379
The Sea of Holes
AFL Club
Richmond
Other Teams
Melbourne Stars, Arsenal
That's the length of time it took Adelaide's Scott Thompson to have his shot for goal after he'd taken a mark in the final minute of today's close game against the Blues.

And during this period the umpire didn't blow time-on once so the time remaining went down from 1:00 to 0:18 seconds.

It was just as well that the Blues weren't within a goal as their chances of victory would've been severely dented by the fact that the umpire didn't even blow time-on at any stage while Thompson was preparing to shoot at goal.

For all the media emphasis on Matthew Lloyd's lengthy prepartion when shooting for goal, the umpire usually calls time-on when he's pulling up his socks and tossing grass in the air, which means only 25 or the 45 seconds are actual gametime that's wasted.

It's about time this time-wasting part of the game was stringently taken care of by rulemakers and umpires - perhaps putting a limit of 30 seconds gametime that can be lost when a player is having a shot at goal.
 
wagstaff said:
That's the length of time it took Adelaide's Scott Thompson to have his shot for goal after he'd taken a mark in the final minute of today's close game against the Blues.

42 seconds is Matthew Lloyds definition of a 'Snap at Goal'

:D
 

Log in to remove this ad.

i don't why it's so hard for the AFL.

If a player takes a mark, they have 10 seconds to do something or it's play on.

If they are clearly taking a legitimate shot at goals (up to the umpire), then 20 seconds after the mark is taken the umpire blows time-off, they then have another 20 seconds to take their shot or the umpire calls play on.

Simple as that!
 

Remove this Banner Ad

42 seconds

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top