Play Nice 45th President of the United States: Donald Trump - Part 9 - The Shi'ites Hit The Fan (Cont. in Part 10, see OP)

[Mick F]

View attachment 773291

Another grub spreading lies, and of course the chief village idiot Lesy supports it. Why do people want to create division in the community and slander our leaders and institutions?

H.R. 1233 was intended to improve public access to all presidential records, not to "keep Obama’s records sealed."

 

[RobbieK]

She got caught with her pants down with staff.

Equal opportunity and all ....

Good riddance.

Resign or be sacked, clear violation of her employment responsibilities.

She did resign.

That doesn't justify publication of the pictures.

 

[Mick F]

She did resign.

That doesn't justify publication of the pictures.

Why are decent posters giving this grub oxygen??!

 

[Chief]

View attachment 773292

It would be interesting to see who makes these memes.

Those ones featuring a badly obscured Star of David we’re totes hilair!

 

[yebiga]

Wow. Nah, your reading of the situation is completely flawed.

I don’t suppose you have any evidence at all to support your version of the story?

I’ll fax them to you

 

[Crankitup]

2 people on FB doesn’t constitute ‘The Democrats’.

Such a short memory.

From an article in the Guardian last year ....

But the enthusiasm around the mere specter of Oprah’s presidency reveals an uncomfortable truth about the hypocrisy of Democrats: all the talk of competency during the 2016 presidential election, qualifications, be they ideological or political, are mere pretexts for their choice of candidate.

In the buildup to and aftershock from the 2016 election, perhaps the loudest and most consistent protest heard from Hillary Clinton supporters was “but she’s the most qualified!” Despite having a longer record of public service, Senator Bernie Sanders was deemed less, and by some, insufficiently qualified to run for president. His relative inexperience with foreign policy was a point of regular critique, and those who supported his candidacy on ideological grounds were dismissed as “purists” who didn’t understand the real “work” of being president.

Oprah Winfrey for president: a wild idea that just got dramatically more real

In fact, Sanders’s candidacy arguably took its biggest hit when he suggested that Clinton’s history of poor political judgments, like her vote for the Iraq war, disqualified her for the presidency. Hillary’s qualifications were considered so unassailable, that to challenge them was considered de facto sexism by many.

Yet somehow, within a year of Trump’s inauguration, a not-insignificant segment of Democratic voters (or at least tweeters) have swung from fetishizing “qualifications” to adopting the Republican line on celebrity candidates whole cloth.

Like Trump, Oprah’s professional and financial success are meant to be taken as indicia of her political prowess.

https://www.theguardian.com/comment...ah-winfrey-president-idea-uncomfortable-truth

 

[Crankitup]

Another grub spreading lies, and of course the chief village idiot Lesy supports it. Why do people want to create division in the community and slander our leaders and institutions?

H.R. 1233 was intended to improve public access to all presidential records ...

Not all. Cummings’ bill included a provision allowing a former or current President 60 days to review and contest potential public disclosure of any “presidential record not previously made available.” Stated intentions are a bit different to actual intentions after all.

 

[RobbieK]

View attachment 773320

Such a short memory.

From an article in the Guardian last year ....


https://www.theguardian.com/comment...ah-winfrey-president-idea-uncomfortable-truth

That article said "a not-insignificant segment of Democratic voters (or at least tweeters)" were boosting Oprah.

So you've disagreed with him for saying it was a couple of people on Facebook with an article saying it was a few more people on Twitter.

 

[Crankitup]

That article said "a not-insignificant segment of Democratic voters (or at least tweeters)" were boosting Oprah.

So you've disagreed with him for saying it was a couple of people on Facebook with an article saying it was a few more people on Twitter.

Maths and English not your strong suit obviously.

Firstly the English comprehension. You quoted a section that said "a not insignificant segment of Democratic voters" and you've paraphrased that as a few people on Twitter.

Secondly the maths.

He said 2. You now saw "a few more" than 2. For most people a few means 3, or 4 and maybe at the most 5.

2+5=7. How does 7 people constitute a significant segment of Democratic voters (or Democratic tweeters if you want to play selective semantics and only focus on the original bracketed portion of the original quote)?

 

[Crankitup]

It would be interesting to see who makes these memes.

I have no idea. Here's another one I like.

 

[RobbieK]

Maths and English not your strong suit obviously.

Firstly the English comprehension. You quoted a section that said "a not insignificant segment of Democratic voters" and you've paraphrased that as a few people on Twitter.

Secondly the maths.

He said 2. You now saw "a few more" than 2. For most people a few means 3, or 4 and maybe at the most 5.

2+5=7. How does 7 people constitute a significant segment of Democratic voters (or Democratic tweeters if you want to play selective semantics and only focus on the original bracketed portion of the original quote)?

I'm the one with a comprehension problem?

The article says "or at least tweeters" because it wasn't based on anything other than tweets. That isn't "selective semantics", that is a pretty fundamental issue. Twitter is not the real world.

 

[Chief]

I have no idea. Here's another one I like.

View attachment 773331

You should probably find out who is feeding you this material before sharing it.

Also, with this one there is a clue right there in the picture.

 

[RobbieK]

You should probably find out who is feeding you this material before sharing it.

Also, with this one there is a clue right there in the picture.

You expect him to read ALL of the text in his memes?

 

[Chief]

You expect him to read ALL of the text in his memes?

Lay off him. That one had lots more words than normal.

 

[Crankitup]

You should probably find out who is feeding you this material before sharing it.

Also, with this one there is a clue right there in the picture.

I look at the message. I don't focus on the messenger. I leave that to people who are into the logical fallacy of poisoning the well.

 

[Crankitup]

Lay off him. That one had lots more words than normal.

This one doesn't have a source on it so it shouldn't trigger anyone.

 

[Crankitup]

I'm the one with a comprehension problem?

The article says "or at least tweeters" because it wasn't based on anything other than tweets. That isn't "selective semantics", that is a pretty fundamental issue. Twitter is not the real world.

Let's see. No comeback on the maths issue so you've conceded that point. Now you're still harping on about the bracketed portion of the quote which was really just inserted under the presumption that people might object on the same basis you are, had it not been inserted. The fact is anyone who cares enough about politics in the US to tweet about it and put forward potential candidates for their preferred side, isn't very likely to be an abstainer, are they?

 

[Crankitup]

... So far all I can see are lies, broken promises and more of the same neoliberal politics that has f’ed over the vast majority of the population.

 

[CM86]

I look at the message. I don't focus on the messenger. I leave that to people who are into the logical fallacy of poisoning the well.

Yeah... but the message is either misleading or an outright lie. So you're not focusing on the message either.

I think you're just posting it for a 'triggered' reaction...
Which is what the people feeding it to you wanted.

'Look at how triggered the left get over a meme... they must really be bad people.'.


Why are you posting about Oprah, when news is released that the House has voted to formalise procedures for the impeachment inquiry?
Why the memes about Barrack, Hillary and Elijah?
Because the message is 'Dems are bad'. You're arguing against the impeachment process, without even talking about it.

 

[iBeng]

View attachment 773337

This just proves memes dont HAVE to be correct for people to agree with them.

 

[Financialpanther]

View attachment 773337

How cute that they made him thing and with big hands as well as being a light shade of white.

 

[The Warlord]

Maths and English not your strong suit obviously.

Good album, though I prefer Boy In Da Corner.

 

[The Warlord]

This one doesn't have a source on it so it shouldn't trigger anyone.

View attachment 773333

Ummmm, he couldn't use social media to hack them in 2008.

 

[Father Jack]

I want to hear more about how the impeachment process that is explicitly written into the constitution is unconstitutional. Surely there's a meme or three about that

 

[yebiga]

I want to hear more about how the impeachment process that is explicitly written into the constitution is unconstitutional. Surely there's a meme or three about that

According to the Washington Examiner, discussions with the whistleblower - revealed by RealClearInvestigations as 33-year-old Eric Ciaramella have been halted, "and there is no discussion of testimony from a second whistleblower, who supported the first's claims."
Trump-Ukraine Whistleblower Suddenly Won't Testify; Lawyers Break Off Negotiations Amid New Revelations

Nancy Pelosi saw this coming and caved to her party anyway. There isn't enough popcorn in the world for what's coming.