Play Nice 47th President of the United States: Donald Trump - Part 20: Here we go again!

When will Trump be finished?

  • Right now. Bloke's a dickhead.

    Votes: 37 44.6%
  • We'll let him run, we'll wipe him out after the election. Be way funnier that way!

    Votes: 14 16.9%
  • At some point, Trump will wipe out all options except for him. Send him to jail.

    Votes: 8 9.6%
  • Needs to be next president of the ICC.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Clean the swamp, Trump2025!

    Votes: 22 26.5%
  • It's not enough to just elect him, him ahead of anyone else!

    Votes: 2 2.4%

  • Total voters
    83

Remove this Banner Ad

Mod Notice
* Thread monitored actively. User who drag it down will be removed

Specifically: reference to TDS (Trump Derangement Syndrome) and its counterpart 'Trumpanzee' or anything similar will no longer be allowed.

Personal attacks are also to be kept to a minimum.

Just a reminder, even if it hasn't come up for a few pages and y'all should know this stuff by now:

This thread is not about Covid, lockdowns, or vaccines. It is about Donald Trump. While Trump was in office during the pandemic and his response to Covid is relevant, there are pertinent threads for you to post your opinions on those things in.

It might also do with reminding a few that when you post on the SRP, you are responsible for backing up/verifying your claims to fact. What this means is that you will be asked time to time to support your claims with evidence, to ensure that this forum is as free of misinfomation as we can make it.

Do not post conspiracy theories on this forum. We have an entire other forum for that.

Thanks all.

As always, please submit ideas for the thread title by tagging Gethelred! We're looking for something new to match the new thread!



< - Trump 19 is back there.
 
Last edited:
I think it's more astonishment that people have ignored every standard that they would otherwise hold a person to to support Trump.

To me Trump is a part of it but far from all of it.

It's partly the economic situation, partly the feeling the Democrats have not only abandoned the working class, but now openly despise them (I think this one is a large factor), partly their relentless identity politics, and to a degree the celebrity endorsements. People aren't stupid, and nothing is going to grate more than arrogant, spoiled, pampered millionaires telling the working class who to vote for (and what to think).

Then add a rather curious twist that happened this time - people have started to like Trump. His many flaws are valid, but I suspect part of it is the bulk of the population aren't too bothered. They can also remember that he actually was in charge for four years already, and the world didn't stop spinning. So if they now display the exact same hysteria (and they have), they aren't going to listen. They also haven't grasped that an entire generation (at least) doesn't get their news the way people in the past did. They just aren't watching. Plenty do listen to podcasts though, and hearing him chat for 3+ hours on multiple shows made him more relatable. Watching him talk about his brother's alcoholism was not what I expected, put it that way.

There's also more access to information than ever and when they scream he's the most racist and sexist President ever everyone can whip out their phone and check. Fooled around with women? Sure, but hardly the first politician to do that, and nowhere near Kennedy. Racist? Doubtful, and not even close to Andrew Johnson or Woodrow Wilson. Sexist? Well, he just appointed the first ever female chief-of-staff, so he's not very good at it if that's the case.

I think more and more simply don't watch, follow, or trust the mainstream media, and have completely lost faith in the Democrats. It was never going to take much to make them switch, and you only need to look at any of the voting maps to see a lot did.
 
View attachment 2164772

What Donny really thinks of his best mate, I’m betting in about 3 years he’ll be saying I hardly knew the guy when everything goes pear shaped
In all fairness, in 3 years time, Donald will be forgetting what he had for breakfast.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

If not swapping sides, actively trashing their own party. Much of which was happening months before the election itself.
Worth remembering that the Democrats sort of cancelled democracy in order to front up a candidate they thought would be best able to defend democracy. A slightly inflammatory statement, perhaps, but the Democrat handling (and in some cases actual cancellation) of their own primaries was being noted and pointed out long before the grand final.

I've been looking at the American election more and more as as shift in US political landscape which has seen the Democrat party increasingly being viewed as the establishment, and that a Democrat vote is a vote for no change rather than change.
I made a note earlier in this thread regarding Marianne Williamson's comment that presently, for Americans, a false hope might be better than no hope. Williamson is far from the only Democrat saying these things.

I've seen plenty of posts in here pointing out just how stupid the American public are purported to be. Perhaps it's time that people here in Australia (at least) commenting in this manner should open their eyes a little, widen the gaze beyond the social media nonsense, and consider that a great many of them might not be stupid at all.
it's gone from the people's party to a mix of elites bitch party and woke mental party. not much in between.
 
To me Trump is a part of it but far from all of it.

It's partly the economic situation, partly the feeling the Democrats have not only abandoned the working class, but now openly despise them (I think this one is a large factor), partly their relentless identity politics, and to a degree the celebrity endorsements. People aren't stupid, and nothing is going to grate more than arrogant, spoiled, pampered millionaires telling the working class who to vote for (and what to think).

Then add a rather curious twist that happened this time - people have started to like Trump. His many flaws are valid, but I suspect part of it is the bulk of the population aren't too bothered. They can also remember that he actually was in charge for four years already, and the world didn't stop spinning. So if they now display the exact same hysteria (and they have), they aren't going to listen. They also haven't grasped that an entire generation (at least) doesn't get their news the way people in the past did. They just aren't watching. Plenty do listen to podcasts though, and hearing him chat for 3+ hours on multiple shows made him more relatable. Watching him talk about his brother's alcoholism was not what I expected, put it that way.

There's also more access to information than ever and when they scream he's the most racist and sexist President ever everyone can whip out their phone and check. Fooled around with women? Sure, but hardly the first politician to do that, and nowhere near Kennedy. Racist? Doubtful, and not even close to Andrew Johnson or Woodrow Wilson. Sexist? Well, he just appointed the first ever female chief-of-staff, so he's not very good at it if that's the case.

I think more and more simply don't watch, follow, or trust the mainstream media, and have completely lost faith in the Democrats. It was never going to take much to make them switch, and you only need to look at any of the voting maps to see a lot did.
I almost hit like, but then you said it was doubtful Trump is racist. Besides when it was proved in court, what else could he say to make you believe?
 
I almost hit like, but then you said it was doubtful Trump is racist. Besides when it was proved in court, what else could he say to make you believe?

And that bit was less offensive than waving off sexual assault as "fooled around with women".

Just another Trump apologist trying to convince himself he's taking a balanced view.
 
Surely Matt Gaetz (under investigation for human trafficking) is only being touted as Attorney General so that the GOP Senators can at least refuse one nomination? Or it's a simple test of loyalty. I guess there'll be more than 4 who are planning on retiring who will demonstrate common sense.
 
its still worth a like, you don't have to agree with the whole post.
Well I agree with your "it resonates with people and they don't care", but not the parts where you suggest he isn't a racist misogynist. He's clearly those things, I'm surprised anyone would deny it.

You tried to excuse the electorate a little bit more than they deserved. They voted for a racist misogynist. Understanding this is where the public in the US stands is important in the context of other western countries who kowtow to the USA because we thought we shared their values. We don't.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Feel for the Palestinians but for the Muslims in Pennsylvania who apparently swung to Trump because he visited a lot and said he'd do more for them than Kamala, this is real leopard face eating territory. Trump told everyone who he was this election campaign, if you ignored that then swallowed his lies when just talking to you, then you made this bed.

Because things were going great for Palestinians under the Democrats.
 
Pentagon to be led by a Fox News host
(His military service is no where near requisite for the role)

Attorney General to be a child sex offender

Making up a meme department (Dept of Govt efficiency I.e DOGE haha get it it’s funny like the meme haha get it do you get why it’s funny it’s a meme??) and get two people (Vivek and Elon) to run it (isn’t 2 less efficient than 1? Hmm).
Notably run by a billionaire (formerly) illegal immigrant.

Anti-UN and anti-Ukraine hawk to be UN ambassador

Etc etc.

We are all in deep trouble.
 
You can't say he's not going all in on hiring the crazies.

What will be amusing is to watch people who either have no experience of government or have played a purely theatircal oppositional role, cope with actual paperwork.
 
Pentagon to be led by a Fox News host
(His military service is no where near requisite for the role)

Attorney General to be a child sex offender

Making up a meme department (Dept of Govt efficiency I.e DOGE haha get it it’s funny like the meme haha get it do you get why it’s funny it’s a meme??) and get two people (Vivek and Elon) to run it (isn’t 2 less efficient than 1? Hmm).
Notably run by a billionaire (formerly) illegal immigrant.

Anti-UN and anti-Ukraine hawk to be UN ambassador

Etc etc.

We are all in deep trouble.

And the Director of National Intelligence a Russian spy. You can't make this shit up.

https://www.msn.com/en-in/news/worl...ussian-spy-gabbard-as-intel-chief/ar-AA1u27Ca
 
I almost hit like, but then you said it was doubtful Trump is racist. Besides when it was proved in court, what else could he say to make you believe?

Being racist means genuinely believing one race is inferior to others. I don't believe that for a minute - not about any other current politician either. On either side.

Saying the odd stupid thing without thinking, no doubt at all.
 
And that bit was less offensive than waving off sexual assault as "fooled around with women".

Just another Trump apologist trying to convince himself he's taking a balanced view.

Neither a Trump apologist nor a Republican nor a Democrat nor an American (loved living there though). I get to watch their elections with amused detachment.

The point was - why did the majority vote for him. I gave what I think are reasons. Rightly or wrongly it seems that's the way they went.
 
getting to decide when the law matters and when it doesn't is the sign of a pissweak person of no integrity

I mean I expect it from trump but I expect better from you.

When the prosecutor is a registered Democrat who was elected running on a "Get Trump" platform, he's hardly impartial.

Anyway, tens of miilions of Americans who voted believed that his prosecutions were political. It might be ok in single party communist states, but its not ok to do that to political opponents in the US. And they voted to send that message.
 
Well I agree with your "it resonates with people and they don't care", but not the parts where you suggest he isn't a racist misogynist. He's clearly those things, I'm surprised anyone would deny it.
How come Trump only became a racist after he wanted to become president?
You say he's a misogynist, but he is giving women important roles in his administration.
 
We can only draw the conclusion (that they aren't stupid) IF what trump does achieves some improved outcomes or at least no significantly worse outcome.

He did that in his first term.




The belief, given the outcomes of the first Trump administration is that he will not.

Last time that belief was proven wrong.


Trumps communication style does not endear himself to most posters here. But it is undeniable that he has a strong emotional resonance with the sections of the US public that voted for him.


Agreed. Never take Trump literally.
 
Neither a Trump apologist nor a Republican nor a Democrat nor an American (loved living there though). I get to watch their elections with amused detachment.

The point was - why did the majority vote for him. I gave what I think are reasons. Rightly or wrongly it seems that's the way they went.

As the other poster mentioned, you were going well when you gave reasons for why millions of Americans voted for him.

Then you played down his sexual assaults and racism. If you meant that you suspected those millions of Americans were ignoring those aspects, you're probably correct. But you went a step further and tried to suggest they weren't real.
 
To me Trump is a part of it but far from all of it.

It's partly the economic situation, partly the feeling the Democrats have not only abandoned the working class, but now openly despise them (I think this one is a large factor), partly their relentless identity politics, and to a degree the celebrity endorsements. People aren't stupid, and nothing is going to grate more than arrogant, spoiled, pampered millionaires telling the working class who to vote for (and what to think).

Then add a rather curious twist that happened this time - people have started to like Trump. His many flaws are valid, but I suspect part of it is the bulk of the population aren't too bothered. They can also remember that he actually was in charge for four years already, and the world didn't stop spinning. So if they now display the exact same hysteria (and they have), they aren't going to listen. They also haven't grasped that an entire generation (at least) doesn't get their news the way people in the past did. They just aren't watching. Plenty do listen to podcasts though, and hearing him chat for 3+ hours on multiple shows made him more relatable. Watching him talk about his brother's alcoholism was not what I expected, put it that way.

There's also more access to information than ever and when they scream he's the most racist and sexist President ever everyone can whip out their phone and check. Fooled around with women? Sure, but hardly the first politician to do that, and nowhere near Kennedy. Racist? Doubtful, and not even close to Andrew Johnson or Woodrow Wilson. Sexist? Well, he just appointed the first ever female chief-of-staff, so he's not very good at it if that's the case.

I think more and more simply don't watch, follow, or trust the mainstream media, and have completely lost faith in the Democrats. It was never going to take much to make them switch, and you only need to look at any of the voting maps to see a lot did.


Great post.
 
How come Trump only became a racist after he wanted to become president?
You say he's a misogynist, but he is giving women important roles in his administration.

There is a 1973 court case in which Trump and his father were charged with race bias in housing rentals. So, no it's not a new allegation, he's been racist forever.

And 'giving women important roles' is the new straw man for those defending his misogyny.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Play Nice 47th President of the United States: Donald Trump - Part 20: Here we go again!

Back
Top