Play Nice 47th President of the United States: Donald Trump - Part 20: If you want Capitalism, you got it

When will Trump be finished?

  • Right now. Bloke's a dickhead.

    Votes: 50 43.9%
  • We'll let him run, we'll wipe him out after the election. Be way funnier that way!

    Votes: 12 10.5%
  • At some point, Trump will wipe out all options except for him. Send him to jail.

    Votes: 10 8.8%
  • Needs to be next president of the ICC.

    Votes: 1 0.9%
  • Clean the swamp, Trump2025!

    Votes: 39 34.2%
  • It's not enough to just elect him, him ahead of anyone else!

    Votes: 2 1.8%

  • Total voters
    114

Remove this Banner Ad

Mod Notice
* Thread monitored actively. User who drag it down will be removed

Specifically: reference to TDS (Trump Derangement Syndrome) and its counterpart 'Trumpanzee' or anything similar will no longer be allowed.

Personal attacks are also to be kept to a minimum.

Just a reminder, even if it hasn't come up for a few pages and y'all should know this stuff by now:

This thread is not about Covid, lockdowns, or vaccines. It is about Donald Trump. While Trump was in office during the pandemic and his response to Covid is relevant, there are pertinent threads for you to post your opinions on those things in.

It might also do with reminding a few that when you post on the SRP, you are responsible for backing up/verifying your claims to fact. What this means is that you will be asked time to time to support your claims with evidence, to ensure that this forum is as free of misinfomation as we can make it.

Do not post conspiracy theories on this forum. We have an entire other forum for that.

Thanks all.

As always, please submit ideas for the thread title by tagging Gethelred! We're looking for something new to match the new thread!



< - Trump 19 is back there.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for that.

Ok, so an ITIN can be obtained by an illegal worker, who can also use it to obtain a driver's licence.

Is this not even more concerning?

It's basically saying the government itself sanctions illegal workers because they can pay them pittance and boot them from the country whenever they feel like it.

So essentially, on this issue alone, is Trump attempting to end, what appears to be some kind of form of indentured servitude in the USA, a bad thing? Because it seems everyone else is fine with these people being taken advantage of for slightly cheaper groceries, construction, etc.

I'm not sure defending the right to abuse an underpaid underclass is a hill I'd personally want to die on.
 
What source would you consider definitive? Does it have to be Fox News approved?

Just as a little educational piece, .org sites are trustworthy enough to be used in academic theses/essays etc. A dot org is usually a registered organisation that is a non-profit, that is designed to provide some sort of information relative to their purpose as a website.

If you don't trust a dot org site, there's nothing you'll trust, unless it confirms your implicit bias to your own logic.
A dot org relies on donations.

Where do you think the donations come from?
 

Log in to remove this ad.

A dot org relies on donations.

Where do you think the donations come from?

You can't be serious. You think there's some deep-seated conspiracy...by a registered organisation...to what? Concoct some elaborate lie that illegal immigrants are paying tax when they're not? To what end?

I love that you'd rather accept the above, than accept that you're just wrong. That's the world we live in. One where everyone thinks they're smarter than much more educated people...purely because 'it just doesn't add up.'

It's actually insanity.
 
homer simpson GIF


The Almighty Dollar, Yanks real God they pray to
 
So essentially, on this issue alone, is Trump attempting to end, what appears to be some kind of form of indentured servitude in the USA, a bad thing? Because it seems everyone else is fine with these people being taken advantage of for slightly cheaper groceries, construction, etc.
That’s not why Trump is doing it and you know that.

I seriously doubt you will find anyone here who will defend ongoing indentured servitude or exploitation. However, deporting them, possibly to a country they aren’t even from, isn’t the answer. First of all, they are in the US because what they receive is still better than their options in their native country, not that this makes it right.

A sudden change like this can only serve to negatively impact the lives of the migrants and the US citizens, that Trump repeatedly says he is going to help.

A long term strategy of enabling a living wage and access to services, while not crashing the economy, is the optimum outcome and I don’t think any “lefties” here would disagree.
 
You can't be serious. You think there's some deep-seated conspiracy...by a registered organisation...to what? Concoct some elaborate lie that illegal immigrants are paying tax when they're not? To what end?

I love that you'd rather accept the above, than accept that you're just wrong. That's the world we live in. One where everyone thinks theyre smarter than much more educated people...purely because 'it just doesn't add up.'

It's actually insanity.
What are you talking about? I just accepted that they pay taxes.

What I will say though that it's wilful ignorance to think that an organisation, especially in the USA, will be unbiased when reporting on certain social issues when they rely on funding, which will likely come from politically motivated individuals and organisations.

Their country is rife with this, from whatever political spectrum, after all.
 
Thanks for that.

Ok, so an ITIN can be obtained by an illegal worker, who can also use it to obtain a driver's licence.

Is this not even more concerning?

It's basically saying the government itself sanctions illegal workers because they can pay them pittance and boot them from the country whenever they feel like it.

So essentially, on this issue alone, is Trump attempting to end, what appears to be some kind of form of indentured servitude in the USA, a bad thing? Because it seems everyone else is fine with these people being taken advantage of for slightly cheaper groceries, construction, etc.

I'm not sure defending the right to abuse an underpaid underclass is a hill I'd personally want to die on.
Whether or not it’s a morally sound aspect of the economy is a separate issue to Trump’s desire for a show of strength in deleting large numbers of them. Including those who have been in the US for decades, have settled lives, maybe have children or spouses who are citizens, are valued members of their communities, are not criminals, may have fled from violence or poverty in their country if birth, and who perform jobs that help keep the US economy ticking over.

Trump’s motives are hardly altruistic. They’re cruel and stoopid.
 
Big time - you would think an immigrant worker would be afraid of doing anything that gets the attention of Uncle Sam as well.
See, this is the issue for me.

It's not that they're doing the work, it's that they're essentially slaves to whatever their employer wants them to do.

I think most are rational to understand that the ones working on the farms/construction sites are likely to be law-abiding people. The ones that commit the heinous crimes aren't the type to do manual labour.

The regular people just trying to make a better life for themselves should, at the very least, go through some kind of proper assessment to be able to stay in the countrY, IMO.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Whether or not it’s a morally sound aspect of the economy is a separate issue to Trump’s desire for a show of strength in deleting large numbers of them. Including those who have been in the US for decades, have settled lives, maybe have children or spouses who are citizens, are valued members of their communities, are not criminals, may have fled from violence or poverty in their country if birth, and who perform jobs that help keep the US economy ticking over.

Trump’s motives are hardly altruistic. They’re cruel and stoopid.
Well, it is to a point, I'll agree on that much.

Still, it isn't up to the USA to accommodate them if they're there illegally, unless you want to pop your tinfoil hat on and blame the CIA for all the disruption in their countries that they fled from, of course ;)

I might join you in that case...
 
They're illegal immigrants, they constitutionally have no rights. You can't give them rights because then there'd be no disincentive for them to try and cross the border.

Remember, they're breaking the law as soon as they cross the border illegally, so they're now a criminal.

Now, a visa program to offer opportunities to people from outside the USA to fill all those emptied jobs, with minimum pay, worker's rights, etc is certainly a discussion worth having.

The current setup just enables them to be taken advantage of, much like the immigrant workers in the middle east.

Yes and no

Plenty of “illegal immigrants” are visa overstayers. The proportion varies, but is significant.

And you have DACA and similar legislation establishing some “rights”, or at least some decriminalisation.
 
How do they pay income tax when they're illegally working?

I'm gonna need this explained to me here.

Withheld income by employers.

And then plenty in sales and other taxes

 
See, this is the issue for me.

It's not that they're doing the work, it's that they're essentially slaves to whatever their employer wants them to do.

I think most are rational to understand that the ones working on the farms/construction sites are likely to be law-abiding people. The ones that commit the heinous crimes aren't the type to do manual labour.

The regular people just trying to make a better life for themselves should, at the very least, go through some kind of proper assessment to be able to stay in the countrY, IMO.
Guess who employed illegals


 
It's basically saying the government itself sanctions illegal workers because they can pay them pittance and boot them from the country whenever they feel like it.

This is exactly it, yup.

Trump isn’t trying to do that though. It’s not targeted at dodgy businesses and illegal employment practices.
The key is where the attention is directed and how it is enforced. Targeting individuals, rather than companies.
If he wanted to stop it for moral reasons, fine and charge the companies. Huge jail terms for employers.
 
This is exactly it, yup.

Trump isn’t trying to do that though. It’s not targeted at dodgy businesses and illegal employment practices.
The key is where the attention is directed and how it is enforced. Targeting individuals, rather than companies.
If he wanted to stop it for moral reasons, fine and charge the companies. Huge jail terms for employers.
Well, jail term for employers should be the aim but he'd be under fire himself if he went that route.

See what happens after that actual convicted criminals are deported to please the MAGA fanbase, I guess.
 
Well, jail term for employers should be the aim but he'd be under fire himself if he went that route.

See what happens after that actual convicted criminals are deported to please the MAGA fanbase, I guess.
They must be pleased with trying to deport military veterans as part of this process.
 
See, this is the issue for me.

It's not that they're doing the work, it's that they're essentially slaves to whatever their employer wants them to do.

I think most are rational to understand that the ones working on the farms/construction sites are likely to be law-abiding people. The ones that commit the heinous crimes aren't the type to do manual labour.

The regular people just trying to make a better life for themselves should, at the very least, go through some kind of proper assessment to be able to stay in the countrY, IMO.

I agree. I don’t think they would disagree either.
The problem is that that isn’t being offered, so they remain in the shadows.
 
What are you talking about? I just accepted that they pay taxes.

What I will say though that it's wilful ignorance to think that an organisation, especially in the USA, will be unbiased when reporting on certain social issues when they rely on funding, which will likely come from politically motivated individuals and organisations.

Their country is rife with this, from whatever political spectrum, after all.

No you disputed 3 separate verifiable articles, only accepting the L when you were provided with a 4th that was irrefutable.

You kept this going much longer than it needed to.

.org is generally not for profit as I said. It's much more trustworthy than 99% of other sources provided.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Play Nice 47th President of the United States: Donald Trump - Part 20: If you want Capitalism, you got it

Back
Top