Abblet high contact again

[captain blood 17]

He has to get a week based on that.


Sent from my iPad using righteous Bhodi manpower

 

[Seadog]

The North player was coming at GAJ at such high speed and therefore force that GAJ had no hope in keeping his arms below his head. I also think the North player slightly ducked to be honest which led to that slight head high contact. Didn't see any malice and ill intent in Gary's eyes, he is just not that type of guy. I think also age is playing a factor, younger GAJ would've had the upper body strength to keep that contact low.

You should do standup, that is flipping hilarious.

 

[Trucker Tiger]

The North player was coming at GAJ at such high speed and therefore force that GAJ had no hope in keeping his arms below his head. I also think the North player slightly ducked to be honest which led to that slight head high contact. Didn't see any malice and ill intent in Gary's eyes, he is just not that type of guy. I think also age is playing a factor, younger GAJ would've had the upper body strength to keep that contact low.

Oh, dear.

 

[BF Tiger]

Raised his arms when he could’ve stayed low. Definitely intentional.

 

[beema limapep]

In the day and age '1 punch can kill', i cant believe such a supposed cleanskin moral rolemodel has been so irresponsible and dangerous two weeks in a row.

It seems to be at odds with the media image been previously pushed.

Got to give him at least a week. Probably 2.

 

[BF Tiger]

Wonder if they’ll rest him after he gets off in appeal?

 

[Boxhead_31]

He has to get a week based on that.


Sent from my iPad using righteous Bhodi manpower

Really.
Explain as to why he has to?

 

[JackFlash]

In the day and age '1 punch can kill', i cant believe such a supposed cleanskin moral rolemodel has been so irresponsible and dangerous two weeks in a row.

It seems to be at odds with the media image been previously pushed.

Got to give him at least a week. Probably 2.

For the same thing that he get off on last week? There was no malice in it, it's just another media beat up....

 

[romeohwho]

One week.

 

[HairyO]

Protected love child will continue to do it until opposition players start returning the favour.

 

[Boxhead_31]

In the day and age '1 punch can kill', i cant believe such a supposed cleanskin moral rolemodel has been so irresponsible and dangerous two weeks in a row.

It seems to be at odds with the media image been previously pushed.

Got to give him at least a week. Probably 2.

So given that a player recently had his neck broken from a bump you must be in the group who thinks Cotchin should have been suspended for multiple weeks for his Shiel bump then, correct?

 

[Underarm]

Much worse than last week. Goes out of his way to make contact, up to Ablett to make sure it doesn't hit the head.

Christiansen should give him 2 weeks so that when the Tribunal gets involved it's brought down to 1.

 

[Killer Hawks]

Uncle Steve Hocking........the geelong plant at the AFL will make sure he gets off again

 

[SheezNuts]

This one was completely different to last week.

Literally changes direction to intentionally strike the player..

 

[Cold Sober]

Bit careless there young Gaz, if you don't want to fly keep your wings down.

 

[Tiger_Of_Old]

The FoxFooty commentators don't seem to think there's much in this somehow, but this is a completely unnecessary elbow to the head for the second week in a row...

Thoughts?

North player to get 6 weeks for headbutting Gazza's forearm.

 

[Trucker Tiger]

For the same thing that he get off on last week? There was no malice in it, it's just another media beef up....

“beef up”

 

[Tex9798]

If Michael Christian grades it differently to last week he should be sacked, almost identical to last week.

 

[aflfootyfanatic]

unnecessary, a week at least if not probably a big fine. The more dog hits he gives, the less respect I have for him, 2 weeks in a row isn't good.

 

[captain blood 17]

Really.
Explain as to why he has to?

Well, it’s his second offence in two weeks. The contact was intentional. It was off the ball. He made contact with the head. There’s some reasons. Why do you think he won’t?


Sent from my iPad using righteous Bhodi manpower

 

[damochandler]

chip off the old block

Didn’t he plead guilty once. Because god told him to

 

[Boxhead_31]

Well, it’s his second offence in two weeks. The contact was intentional. It was off the ball. He made contact with the head. There’s some reasons. Why do you think he won’t?


Sent from my iPad using righteous Bhodi manpower

3mins tribunal decision that said it was careless

 

[Gumby2Hurley]

Has steve hocking on speed dial.

 

[captain blood 17]

3mins tribunal decision that said it was careless

That’s last week. You haven’t stated why shouldn’t get suspended this week. This is another seperate case. High intentional contact to the head. I understand your emotional investment in this, but, take away the jumper and look at the incident. But, we are talking the MRP here. Could be anything from a fine to life.


Sent from my iPad using righteous Bhodi manpower

 

[Boxhead_31]

That’s last week. You haven’t stated why shouldn’t get suspended this week. This is another seperate case. High intentional contact to the head. I understand your emotional investment in this, but, take away the jumper and look at the incident. But, we are talking the MRP here. Could be anything from a fine to life.


Sent from my iPad using righteous Bhodi manpower

Initial contact is with the chest, there is minimal if any contact with the head.
Force is low, the player was arguing with the umpire that he should get a free kick